Science Men Are More Selfishly Dishonest Than Women - Research on gender differences in dishonesty.

KEY POINTS​

  • Though gender differences in deception are small, when it comes to selfish dishonesty, women never surpass men.
  • New research shows that compared to women, men engage in more deception, especially when telling lies that promote self-interest.
  • Gender differences in dishonesty may be related to emotion and self-regulation (e.g., level of competitiveness, guilt-proneness).
Willgard/Pixabay

Source: Willgard/Pixabay
We value honesty (i.e. being truthful, sincere, straightforward) in political leaders, therapists, friends, family, and especially, our romantic partners. After all, honesty is a determinant of trustworthiness.
Being honest is also considered a character strength; and—along with characteristics such as being intelligent, educated, and knowledgeable—is associated with higher social status.

Research shows there are also gender differences in honesty.
A recent paper by Kennedy and Kray, published in Current Opinion in Psychology, suggests men are more selfishly dishonest than women.
Before discussing gender differences in dishonesty, let us talk about the causes and consequences of deception.

The causes and consequences of dishonesty​

People try to deceive others frequently and for a variety of reasons: To get what they want, to save face, to avoid punishment, etc.
Because the accuracy rate of lie detection is nowhere close to 100 percent, even when using tried-and-true lie detection techniques, one cannot tell for sure if a person is lying or telling the truth.

But does that matter? It depends. Dishonesty can have both positive and negative consequences for those being lied to (e.g., the person’s parents, romantic partner, or employees) but also for the liar.
To illustrate, though certain forms of deception may help an upwardly mobile professional move up the socioeconomic scale, they can have negative physical and mental health consequences as well: Greater social disconnection and feelings of loneliness, raised blood pressure, increased heart rate, and higher cortisol reactivity.

Gender differences in dishonesty​

The majority of previous meta-analyses have found women are more honest than men.
For instance, one meta-analysis of over 8,700 observations found men told both more black lies (i.e. deception for personal benefit) and white lies (i.e. altruistic lies).
As for specific examples, research shows that firms with male Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) are more likely to engage in financial misreporting than firms with female CFOs. And men, compared to women, engage in more academic dishonesty.

Similar gender differences have been observed for self-deception:
Compared to women, men are more likely to deceive themselves, believing they are superior and deserving of special treatment. This is driven primarily by the exploitative/entitlement facet of narcissism, a facet associated with maladaptive and toxic behaviors such as emotional manipulation (e.g., gaslighting), aggression, harassment, and refusal to forgive.

What causes gender differences in dishonesty?​

Gender differences in deception may be due to evolutionary and/or cultural factors.
Evolutionary explanations concern how useful dishonesty may have been in sexual and natural selection processes. Specifically, men who succeeded in misleading women (for the purposes of obtaining short-term sexual access) were more likely to pass on their genes.

Put differently, in ancient settings, deception was less costly and more rewarding for men than women.
As for cultural explanations, the most accepted accounts are related to social role theory, which proposes that the division of labor in society explains why men engage in more deceptive behavior.
Consistent with this theory, research indicates work experience often reduces differences in deception and unethical behavior. For example, the authors note, “among politicians and lawyers—professions where deception might be perceived to signal competence—men and women lie to similar degrees.”

Sammy-Sander/Pixabay

Source: Sammy-Sander/Pixabay

Gender differences and self-regulation​

Gender differences in lying, regardless of their ultimate cause (nature vs. nurture), may also be explained by psychological processes, particularly those that impact self-regulation.
Self-regulation refers to processes involved in monitoring and controlling one’s thoughts, emotions, and actions according to personal standards and goals.

So, what are some psychological differences between the genders related to self-regulation?
Men are more competitive than women, an inclination associated with a greater willingness to deceive. Indeed, a recent study found that inducing “either competitive or empathic feelings towards counterparts mitigate differences in sex differences in lying.”

Additionally, women tend to have stronger moral identities. And when they do not behave in ways that meet their personal standards, they are more likely to experience guilt and feel responsible for others’ negative outcomes.
Therefore, competitiveness, moral identity, and guilt-proneness affect the psychological interpretation of a situation and willingness to modify one’s behavior based on personal standards. So, these self-regulatory tendencies predict willingness to engage in and approval of deceptive or unethical behavior.

Takeaway​

Though situational factors or habits can sometimes outweigh gender differences, women never surpass men when it comes to selfish dishonesty.
Simply put, men are more dishonest than women, particularly in competitive environments and situations where deception serves self-interest.
One way of explaining gender differences in honesty involves self-regulatory mechanisms: Generally speaking, women are less competitive, more guilt-prone, and have greater moral identity strength than men.
 
Putting aside the obvious bullshit nature of this "finding" to anyone who's lived on Planet Earth for more than three years or so...

Does ANYONE still give any credence to "studies" anymore? Especially those having to do with gender or psychology?
Not until I read the study which I will not pay to do.

I am very wary of anyone content locking their supporting data.
 
Men and women both lie, but, studies have shown that every time a man tells a lie, another fairy drops dead!
 
Translation: Why won't you give us a chance anymore?! We only want to divorce rape you.

Also, articles like these feels like a societal version of a woman's tantrum when she doesn't get her way. Just like an unruly child.
 
Men tell lies to make themselves look better. Women tell lies to make other people look worse.
 
The sheer number of articles written about lack of sex and relationships must mean there are a lot of femcels frustrated about not getting a date. If it was other way around, the society would just call the guy an incel and call it a day. At this point I find it comical. There are some solutions to fix the impaired gender relationship but western society will not let it happen until everything gets way worse than now.
 
Putting aside the obvious bullshit nature of this "finding" to anyone who's lived on Planet Earth for more than three years or so...

Does ANYONE still give any credence to "studies" anymore? Especially those having to do with gender or psychology?
Leftist npcs and the people who give out worthless graduate degrees in sociology and psychology… oh wait I already said lefty npcs
 
Don't see the methodology, sample size and the actual study is pay walled.
I am very wary of anyone content locking their supporting data.
Here's the link to the meta analysis. It's free on Cambridge.

I know that men with higher testosterone are less likely to lie in lieu of aggression and confidence. I also know that women are more collectivist and men are more individualistic. Whatever conclusions about men vs women lying doesn't particularly matter. Most people know from experience that even if women may not literally "lie" more than men they certainly are more likely to bend to society's expectations and cliques.

Basically the question is, who do you think is willing to honestly call out a fag for being a faggot? A man or a woman?
 
Here's the link to the meta analysis. It's free on Cambridge.

I know that men with higher testosterone are less likely to lie in lieu of aggression and confidence. I also know that women are more collectivist and men are more individualistic. Whatever conclusions about men vs women lying doesn't particularly matter. Most people know from experience that even if women may not literally "lie" more than men they certainly are more likely to bend to society's expectations and cliques.

Basically the question is, who do you think is willing to honestly call out a fag for being a faggot? A man or a woman?
Thanks for that. Its a meta analysis of sender receiver games. Which means this stupid researcher completely misunderstood what they were testing for.

Sender receiver games test trust (in reality, its testing how "competitive" someone actually is but whatever), not whether they are more dishonest in general. Fucking idiots entire study is worthless because they don't understand the basis of what the test is for in the first place.
 
I'm only willing to accept this premise, if you're willing to segregate lies.

Men lie mostly for gain.

Women lie mostly to avoid responsibility.

These are both self-interested, and I know they won't put in the effort past this.
 
"Selfish dishonesty" is such a made up term perfect for women. You can just imagine some fat feminist saying "when you cheat on me it's dishonest because you only need sex, when I cheat on you it's for my mental health".
 
I was about to say surveys asking how many lies people make are going to be fucking hillarious, like asking how often people have sex or their cock sizes. But apparently the journoscum didn't even do that. They did a fucking meta-analysis.

Because congregating multiple observational case studies will totally not make a biased study that is totally accurate to population statistics. Which is why people don't do meta-analyses that fucking often as a study inofitself instead of a prelim for an actual fucking study.
The sheer number of articles written about lack of sex and relationships must mean there are a lot of femcels frustrated about not getting a date. If it was other way around, the society would just call the guy an incel and call it a day. At this point I find it comical. There are some solutions to fix the impaired gender relationship but western society will not let it happen until everything gets way worse than now.
Speaking of I found a thing here you go guys:
a6E3epbB_700w_0.jpg
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo