Science Men Are More Selfishly Dishonest Than Women - Research on gender differences in dishonesty.

KEY POINTS​

  • Though gender differences in deception are small, when it comes to selfish dishonesty, women never surpass men.
  • New research shows that compared to women, men engage in more deception, especially when telling lies that promote self-interest.
  • Gender differences in dishonesty may be related to emotion and self-regulation (e.g., level of competitiveness, guilt-proneness).
Willgard/Pixabay

Source: Willgard/Pixabay
We value honesty (i.e. being truthful, sincere, straightforward) in political leaders, therapists, friends, family, and especially, our romantic partners. After all, honesty is a determinant of trustworthiness.
Being honest is also considered a character strength; and—along with characteristics such as being intelligent, educated, and knowledgeable—is associated with higher social status.

Research shows there are also gender differences in honesty.
A recent paper by Kennedy and Kray, published in Current Opinion in Psychology, suggests men are more selfishly dishonest than women.
Before discussing gender differences in dishonesty, let us talk about the causes and consequences of deception.

The causes and consequences of dishonesty​

People try to deceive others frequently and for a variety of reasons: To get what they want, to save face, to avoid punishment, etc.
Because the accuracy rate of lie detection is nowhere close to 100 percent, even when using tried-and-true lie detection techniques, one cannot tell for sure if a person is lying or telling the truth.

But does that matter? It depends. Dishonesty can have both positive and negative consequences for those being lied to (e.g., the person’s parents, romantic partner, or employees) but also for the liar.
To illustrate, though certain forms of deception may help an upwardly mobile professional move up the socioeconomic scale, they can have negative physical and mental health consequences as well: Greater social disconnection and feelings of loneliness, raised blood pressure, increased heart rate, and higher cortisol reactivity.

Gender differences in dishonesty​

The majority of previous meta-analyses have found women are more honest than men.
For instance, one meta-analysis of over 8,700 observations found men told both more black lies (i.e. deception for personal benefit) and white lies (i.e. altruistic lies).
As for specific examples, research shows that firms with male Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) are more likely to engage in financial misreporting than firms with female CFOs. And men, compared to women, engage in more academic dishonesty.

Similar gender differences have been observed for self-deception:
Compared to women, men are more likely to deceive themselves, believing they are superior and deserving of special treatment. This is driven primarily by the exploitative/entitlement facet of narcissism, a facet associated with maladaptive and toxic behaviors such as emotional manipulation (e.g., gaslighting), aggression, harassment, and refusal to forgive.

What causes gender differences in dishonesty?​

Gender differences in deception may be due to evolutionary and/or cultural factors.
Evolutionary explanations concern how useful dishonesty may have been in sexual and natural selection processes. Specifically, men who succeeded in misleading women (for the purposes of obtaining short-term sexual access) were more likely to pass on their genes.

Put differently, in ancient settings, deception was less costly and more rewarding for men than women.
As for cultural explanations, the most accepted accounts are related to social role theory, which proposes that the division of labor in society explains why men engage in more deceptive behavior.
Consistent with this theory, research indicates work experience often reduces differences in deception and unethical behavior. For example, the authors note, “among politicians and lawyers—professions where deception might be perceived to signal competence—men and women lie to similar degrees.”

Sammy-Sander/Pixabay

Source: Sammy-Sander/Pixabay

Gender differences and self-regulation​

Gender differences in lying, regardless of their ultimate cause (nature vs. nurture), may also be explained by psychological processes, particularly those that impact self-regulation.
Self-regulation refers to processes involved in monitoring and controlling one’s thoughts, emotions, and actions according to personal standards and goals.

So, what are some psychological differences between the genders related to self-regulation?
Men are more competitive than women, an inclination associated with a greater willingness to deceive. Indeed, a recent study found that inducing “either competitive or empathic feelings towards counterparts mitigate differences in sex differences in lying.”

Additionally, women tend to have stronger moral identities. And when they do not behave in ways that meet their personal standards, they are more likely to experience guilt and feel responsible for others’ negative outcomes.
Therefore, competitiveness, moral identity, and guilt-proneness affect the psychological interpretation of a situation and willingness to modify one’s behavior based on personal standards. So, these self-regulatory tendencies predict willingness to engage in and approval of deceptive or unethical behavior.

Takeaway​

Though situational factors or habits can sometimes outweigh gender differences, women never surpass men when it comes to selfish dishonesty.
Simply put, men are more dishonest than women, particularly in competitive environments and situations where deception serves self-interest.
One way of explaining gender differences in honesty involves self-regulatory mechanisms: Generally speaking, women are less competitive, more guilt-prone, and have greater moral identity strength than men.
 
Studies from a trusted source say gender warriors are fucked-up cretins that should seek counselling, possibly medication kill themselves for the betterment of all mankind.

Source: my ass. It's as credible as any of these stupid "studies".
 
Press x to doubt...
Men will lie about their dick size, men will peacock about how great they are, and then when they're actually in a relationship the lies are revealed. Male to female transexuals take this behavior to a new level by lying about being transexual.

A woman is typically what you see is what you get unless they're mental. Females are biologically predisposed to provide an attractive exterior while their minds go unnoticed (hello female autism statistic). Men don't like to do much thinking or investigation when it comes to prospective mates, so superficial is preferable.
 
Guess they didnt ask women their age or weight.

Also guess they didnt take into account things like fibromaylgia or other psych issues that are basically women lying for attention.
 
I will deconstruct this article for all of the normies. Only ( white ) men have power and can thus be "selfishly" dishonest about things, women are the victims of ( white ) men and thus when they are dishonest ( for example about any debts they may have, how many gallons of semen they have consumed in their lifetime and by how many different donors, their age, their weight, their actual appearance ) they are only doing so to avert the ire of their eternal oppressor.

Approximately $49.2 billion is generated by cosmetics sales in the United States each year. On average, Americans spend between $244 and $313 on cosmetics every month. The global cosmetics industry is valued at $571.10 billion. The cosmetics industry is growing at a rate of 3.8% each year.
 
“Were you listening at all”
“Yeah”
Proof of the claim.
 
Men will lie about their dick size, men will peacock about how great they are, and then when they're actually in a relationship the lies are revealed. Male to female transexuals take this behavior to a new level by lying about being transexual.

A woman is typically what you see is what you get unless they're mental. Females are biologically predisposed to provide an attractive exterior while their minds go unnoticed (hello female autism statistic). Men don't like to do much thinking or investigation when it comes to prospective mates, so superficial is preferable.
The best you could come up with about men is lying about their appearance? Lmao. There are entire multibillion dollar industries based around helping women lie about every aspect of their appearance.

Women will lie to escape any consequence for their actions, no matter how small the consequences are. They lie about motivations. They often lie to advance themselves at work or socially or to avoid responsibility. Women are never what you see is what you get. They bank on men's physical attraction to hide how manipulative they are.
 
Define "woman"

Females are biologically predisposed to provide an attractive exterior
And, pray tell, how do they go about achieving this attractive exterior? Make-up? Instagram filters? Deceptive camera angles? Rigged weight scales?

All forms of lying.

Which isn't a bad thing. This whole argument is stupid. Do we shame the tiger for its camouflage?
 
However, gender differences in dishonesty are often small and mutable across situations. We propose that attending to self-regulatory constructs such as moral identity might help researchers move beyond the evolutionary-cultural debates over the origin of gender differences toward identifying factors that promote honesty from both genders.
That quote? It's from the abstract of the paper the article uses as reference. Bolded suggests to me that their results weren't exactly significant or surprising.
 
There's a striking lack of comparison in this article.

It says that men are more X than women at multiple points-- it starts off saying that men are more "selfishly" deceitful than women. That qualification would lead me to believe that there's a kind of deception that women do more of compared to men, but it's never mentioned. In fact, the article charges that men tell more "black lies" (which it defines as "for personal benefit") and "white lies" (which it defines as "altruistic lies").

...so does that mean that they're also more "selflessly" dishonest than women? Then, what's with the article title? If the article writer is alleging that The Science says women lie less overall, then that's just bullshit. Though, it doesn't even seem like it does that:

What causes gender differences in dishonesty?​

Gender differences in deception may be due to evolutionary and/or cultural factors.
Evolutionary explanations concern how useful dishonesty may have been in sexual and natural selection processes. Specifically, men who succeeded in misleading women (for the purposes of obtaining short-term sexual access) were more likely to pass on their genes.

Put differently, in ancient settings, deception was less costly and more rewarding for men than women.
As for cultural explanations, the most accepted accounts are related to social role theory, which proposes that the division of labor in society explains why men engage in more deceptive behavior.
Consistent with this theory, research indicates work experience often reduces differences in deception and unethical behavior. For example, the authors note, “among politicians and lawyers—professions where deception might be perceived to signal competence—men and women lie to similar degrees.”
Even the writer's proposed "evolutionary" explanation just glosses over the fact that its own field asserts that women themselves seek short-term sexual access on a schedule and would therefore have reason to mislead men in the same way that men would have reason to mislead women.

Women will lie to escape any consequence for their actions, no matter how small the consequences are. They lie about motivations. They often lie to advance themselves at work or socially or to avoid responsibility.
None of this is exclusive to women. It's just that all but a relative few men are forced to take responsibility for their actions regardless of whether they were willing to do so. Meanwhile, many men pity women/think of them as lesser, and therefore aid them in not taking responsibility for their actions, something they accept thanklessly when they do).

However, it's acknowledged by men and women alike that women are more inclined to tow the line set by a society's social orthodoxy in order to fit in and look good-- which is why this line from the article:

Additionally, women tend to have stronger moral identities. And when they do not behave in ways that meet their personal standards, they are more likely to experience guilt and feel responsible for others’ negative outcomes.
Therefore, competitiveness, moral identity, and guilt-proneness affect the psychological interpretation of a situation and willingness to modify one’s behavior based on personal standards.
is dishonest, since women's "personal standards" are notably influenced (generally, and relative to men) by social conformity. See the mostly unimpeded incursion of MtFs into women's spaces.

Which isn't a bad thing.
It is a bad thing. It's IRL catfishing, and what makes it worse is that men are more than uncommonly blamed for the intrinsic dependence women generally have on makeup-- when they force that dependence and conformity upon each other.

As if men would be able to do anything but adapt if women collectively stopped wearing makeup. As if men don't pursue women that are arguably aesthetically challenged because of the broadness of our tastes (since, among other things, the way men rely on women is simpler than the way women rely on men).
 
Última edición:
Putting aside the obvious bullshit nature of this "finding" to anyone who's lived on Planet Earth for more than three years or so...

Does ANYONE still give any credence to "studies" anymore? Especially those having to do with gender or psychology?
 
It is a bad thing. It's IRL catfishing, and what makes it worse is that men are more than uncommonly blamed for the intrinsic dependence women generally have on makeup-- when they force that dependence and conformity upon each other.
A woman attracting a man via baller make-up skills is absolutely a valid dating strategy. It falls under self-grooming skills, and different types of make-up express the type of person wearing it and who they wish to attract.

Make-up is also a status symbol. If you get rid of it, women (or more correctly, the homosexuals who control the fashion indsutry) will just find a replacement because hierarchical creatures require measures of status. You may as well be asking men to stop wearing nice shoes because it might accidently convince women they have game. And you'll take my kicks from my cold, dead hands hombré.
 
It falls under self-grooming
Taking a shower is "self-grooming". Combing your hair, brushing your teeth, or lotioning your face? Self-grooming.

Ruining your skin with pore-clogging foreskin powders is not "self-grooming"-- it is in the same class as plastic surgery. The woman wearing it is trying to sell me a lie unless what she's showing off is that she's a good facepainting artist.

When I wake up to her face in the morning, it will not have the makeup she tried to use to seduce me. She probably will not wear makeup around the house. Any children we have will not inherit her makeup.

You may as well be asking men to stop wearing nice shoes because it might accidently convince women they have game
There are practical reasons we invented shoes-- walking barefoot can be outright dangerous. May as well have fun with it.

Nobody has ever been in danger from having an unadorned face.

Make-up is also a status symbol.
For other women, yes.

The status I'm looking for in a woman is "not a whore".
 
Atrás
Top Abajo