Man Lights Himself on Fire Outside Trump Trial - Schizoid Bernie 2016 r/conspiracy tard gets cooked


Man lights himself on fire outside courthouse during Trump trial: reports​


By Theresa Seiger, Cox Media Group National Content DeskApril 19, 2024 at 1:53 pm EDT

1713549894987.png

A man appeared to light himself on fire outside a New York City courthouse on Friday where a jury was being chosen for the criminal trial of former President Donald Trump, according to multiple reports.

The incident happened as reporters were gathered outside of the courthouse to cover Trump’s trial, CNN reported. On-air, reporter Laura Coates said it appeared that a man had set himself on fire.

CNN Reporter raps live on air


Emergency crews rushed the man away on a stretcher, The Associated Press reported. Their condition was not immediately known.

The incident happened a short while after a full panel of 12 jurors and six alternates was chosen to deliberate in Trump’s hush money trial. Opening statements in the case are expected to start on Monday.

©2024 Cox Media Group
 
Última edición:
2017, Strong Towns:
Max has studied anthropology, public policy and urban planning. His work is as diverse as his residence, from energy management in New York to electoral politics in Sacramento to social justice in Los Angeles. You can currently find him riding his prized Yamaha scooter up and down the beach in the Outer Banks, North Carolina. Max's passions include chess, creative writing, and Medieval Scandinavian poetry. He considers Microsoft Paint to be the most underrated software of all time. He's also going to star in upcoming documentary where he hopes to set high scores on 48 classic arcade games in a two-day marathon session.
He sounds just like a typical "enlightened" bugman out there. I refuse to believe that this was a functioning schizophrenic who just stopped taking meds, something happened to him that caused him to lose it.
 
Max Azzarello has now died, according to New York Post.

Original | Archive
Im a bit sad, he might had been a legit schizo but despite that he seemed harmless and it would had been a blast to see him survive it and become a regular cow with his antics.
Like a bizarre left leaning Terry, welp those who burn the brightest also burn the fastest, god speed Max.
 
Última edición:
Imagine setting yourself on fire because you thought you have uncovered a giant government run ponzi scheme, but you completely missed the real massive government run ponzi scheme called social security. Lol, lmao even.
 
The last third of his article reminds you that while you may hate journalists, you don't hate them nearly enough.

Live video of man who set himself on fire outside court proves challenging for news organizations
Associated Press (archive.ph)
By David Bauder
2024-04-20 03:47:46GMT
NEW YORK (AP) — Video cameras stationed outside the Manhattan courthouse where former President Donald Trump is on trial caught the gruesome scene Friday of a man who lit himself on fire and the aftermath as authorities tried to rescue him.

CNN, Fox News Channel and MSNBC were all on the air with reporters talking about the seating of a jury when the incident happened and other news agencies, including The Associated Press, were livestreaming from outside the courthouse. The man, who distributed pamphlets before dousing himself in an accelerant and setting himself on fire, was in critical condition.

The incident tested how quickly the networks could react, and how they decided what would be too disturbing for their viewers to see.

With narration from Laura Coates, CNN had the most extensive view of the scene. Coates, who at first incorrectly said it was a shooting situation, then narrated as the man was visible onscreen, enveloped in flames.

“You can smell burning flesh,” Coates, an anchor and CNN’s chief legal analyst, said as she stood at the scene with reporter Evan Perez.

The camera switched back and forth between Coates and what was happening in the park. Five minutes after the incident started, CNN posted the onscreen message “Warning: Graphic Content.”

Coates later said she couldn’t “overstate the emotional response of watching a human being engulfed in flames and to watch his body be lifted into a gurney.” She described it as an “emotional and unbelievably disturbing moment here.”

Fox’s cameras caught the scene briefly as reporter Eric Shawn talked, then the network switched to a courtroom sketch of Trump on trial.

“We deeply apologize for what has happened,” Shawn said.

On MSNBC, reporter Yasmin Vossoughian narrated the scene. The network showed smoke in the park, but no picture where the body was visible.

“I could see the outline of his body inside the flames,” Vossoughian said, “which was so terrifying to see. As he went to the ground his knees hit the ground first.”

The AP had a camera with an unnarrated live shot stationed outside the courthouse, shown on YouTube and APNews.com. The cameras caught an extensive view, with the man lighting himself afire and later writhing on the ground before a police officer tried to douse the flames with a jacket.

The AP later removed its live feed from its YouTube channel and replaced it with a new one because of the graphic nature of the content.

The news agency distributed carefully edited clips to its video clients — not showing the moment the man lit himself on fire, for example, said executive producer Tom Williams.

Julien Gorbach, a University of Hawaii at Manoa associate professor of journalism, said news organizations didn’t face much of a dilemma about whether to show the footage because there was little for the public to gain by seeing images of a man lighting himself on fire.

The episode highlights how fast information travels and the importance of critical thinking, Gorbach said.

“It outpaces our ability to a) sort out the facts, and b) do the kind of methodical, critical thinking that we need to do so that we understand the truth of what actually this incident was all about,” Gorbach said.

The location of the incident may have prompted some to think the self-immolation was related to the trial.

Gorbach, who was listening to MSNBC on satellite radio when it happened, said the coverage he heard was careful to question whether there was any connection to the trial. It also raised the possibility the man may have wanted to get media attention.

News organizations can’t suppress the news just so the public doesn’t get confused, he said. Word would get out regardless as non-journalists post accounts online.

“So it’s really a test of us as a public,” he said.
 
That fucking CNN reporter. "A man has emblazoned himself."

My fucking sides. :story:

Blazon comes from Middle English blason and means to adorn oneself. It has nothing to do with fire. Jesus Christ. "Em-blaze-oned". JESUS.

This is why you should never self-immolate. Some retarded reporter with a tenuous grasp of English will say shit like this about you on live television.

Let's see his manifesto.


As it turns out, we have a secret kleptocracy: Both parties are run by financial criminals whose only goals are to divide, deceive, and bleed us dry. They divide the public against itself and blame the other party while everything gets worse and more expensive and handful of people take all the money.
Well, I can tell you one thing. He's correct.

Except it's not a secret. It's a very, very obvious kleptocracy. A kleptocracy that murdered Danny Casolaro for investigating the BCCI and Robert Maxwell, and that murdered Daphne Galizia for investigating Panamanian tax havens, and has basically killed journalists and whistleblowers left and right over the years for calling it out.


Why make the kleptocrats' job easier by burning yourself, though? If he really wanted to die so bad, why wouldn't he stick around and be a schizo thorn in their side until they ran out of patience and made him look like he slit his wrists in a bathtub, or some shit? Maybe go out like Arthur in Michael Clayton, with a couple hitmen injecting his foot with some shit.

There are lots of ways you can get publicity, if your message is clear and concise and meaningful enough, without self-harming in public for it. You just have to be tenacious. Write a good manifesto, and you spam it out there and email it to the right people, and they'll do the work of promotion for you.

The thing is, his manifesto is frankly kind of dull and schizo, for the most part, so I doubt it'd gain traction by that method unless he took the time to write a proper one, with a convincing central argument. A hook, if you will.

His Substack post was substantially more detailed and coherent than the pamphlet, but, in general, he's missing a lot of key points. For instance, he calls out Stanford, but doesn't mention Renee DiResta or the Stanford Internet Observatory, or SJ Terp and her bullshit. He also calls out Harvard and Epstein and the "Program for Evolutionary Dynamics", but doesn't name anyone else involved in it, like Martin Nowak:


RESEARCH​

How does natural selection favor cooperation?​

Mathematical models show that natural selection, on its own, opposes cooperation. Non-cooperators will do better than cooperators and wipe them out. So natural selection needs help to favor cooperation—mechanisms that make sure we get more from cooperating than being selfish. There are five of these mechanisms. Direct reciprocity is based on repeated encounters between the same two individuals: I help you and you help me. Indirect reciprocity is based on reputation: I help you and somebody else helps me. Spatial selection means that clusters of cooperators can prevail: Neighbors help each other. Group selection occurs if there is competition between groups: The members of a group help each other. Kin selection is based on interactions between close genetic relatives: Brothers help each other, for example.

How does cooperation spread in a community?​

Research reveals that cooperation has the best chance to spread in a community if there are many possibilities for productive interactions, if there are repeated encounters between the same people, and if people know each other and value their reputation. In this case, we can draw on the mechanisms of direct reciprocity—I scratch your back and you scratch mine—and indirect reciprocity, which means I scratch your back and I believe that somebody else will scratch mine down the road.

How much does reputation matter?​

Because we spend most of our lives in a relatively small population in which we interact with the same people again and again, we continually monitor and interpret how people act. How we decide to behave toward others depends on both what they have previously done to us and how they have treated others. When people are asked if they want to donate money to another person, for example, research finds that people base their decision on what that person has done in the past. Generous people are more likely to receive donations. When we are deciding how to act, we also often subconsciously take into account the possible consequences for our own reputation.

Is reward better than punishment for promoting public cooperation?​

Costly punishment, in which one person punishes another at a cost to himself, rarely pays off. In cooperation games, those who engage in costly punishment do not benefit from their behavior individually, and the use of punitive behavior bestow no benefit on the group as a whole. In an extremely competitive setting, the winners are those who resist the temptation to escalate conflicts, while the losers punish and perish. These results demonstrate that costly punishment is not an effective force for promoting cooperation, and our tendency to engage in acts of spiteful punishment must have evolved for other reasons, such as establishing a dominance hierarchy or defending ownership.

How did “eusociality” arise?​

Eusociality is a cooperative living arrangement in which members of a species give up their own chances of reproduction to help raise the offspring of others. Traditionally, researchers have thought that eusociality arises through “kin selection theory.” Members of the group who give up their own reproduction to help others aren’t really altruistic; by helping their kin—who are genetically similar—they are actually favoring their own genes indirectly. With evolutionary biologist E.O. Wilson and mathematical biologist Corina Tarnita, Martin has come up with an alternative explanation: They argue that natural selection alone can explain the evolution of eusocial behavior through a number of steps. If a species follows these steps—its members stick together and develop the traits and genes that cause them to cooperate—eusociality is the result.


His analysis of these groups is unfortunately shallow. There's a lot more to this story than he lets on.

Jeffrey Epstein was not a real billionaire. He was a Rothschild, Mossad, and CIA pawn who received money from a slush fund managed by Les Wexner and the Bronfmans called the Mega Group, which is yet another fake philanthropy foundation that rich cunts use to move money around. The science projects that Epstein funded were various things that his handlers were interested in. He was just the bagman.


By virtue of the role of many Mega Group members as major political donors in both the U.S. and Israel, several of its most notable members have close ties to the governments of both countries as well as their intelligence communities. As this report and a subsequent report will show, the Mega Group also had close ties to two businessmen who worked for Israel’s Mossad — Robert Maxwell and Marc Rich — as well as to top Israeli politicians, including past and present prime ministers with deep ties to Israel’s intelligence community.

One of those businessmen working for the Mossad, Robert Maxwell, will be discussed at length in this report. Maxwell, who was a business partner of Mega Group co-founder Charles Bronfman, aided the successful Mossad plot to plant a trapdoor in U.S.-created software that was then sold to governments and companies throughout the world. That plot’s success was largely due to the role of a close associate of then-President Ronald Reagan and an American politician close to Maxwell, who later helped aid Reagan in the cover-up of the Iran Contra scandal.

Years later, Maxwell’s daughter — Ghislaine Maxwell — would join Jeffrey Epstein’s “inner circle” at the same time Epstein was bankrolling a similar software program now being marketed for critical electronic infrastructure in the U.S. and abroad. That company has deep and troubling connections to Israeli military intelligence, associates of the Trump administration, and the Mega Group.

Jeffrey Epstein met with Ehud Barak "dozens of times":


Alan Dershowitz was introduced to him by Lynn Forester de fucking Rothschild:


That should tell you everything you need to know about Epstein.

A good litmus test to see in a political commenter is a fucking idiot worth wasting time on, is whether they try to assign this guy to the far left or far right. It's pretty clear he's a brain-broken midwit centrist with several idée fixes that obscure an overall solid point: that normal people are getting fucked hard and raw by the people in power, political parties don't matter, and it's all bread and circuses until there's nothing left for them to loot from the till.

If anything the incipient mental illness probably broke him out of his programming, otherwise he'd still be blithely writing pointless bullshit articles about "livable cities".

He's Uncle Ted or Saint Terry without the genius IQ.
Just smart enough to perceive the uniparty blob for the scam that it is. Just stupid enough to set himself on fire to tell us all what we already know to be the case.

I like doing dramatic readings of schizo manifestos, so here goes.

 

Archivos adjuntos

I think we lost a great lolcow. I myself am really autistic when it comes to the Simpsons so it brings me great joy when I see a fellow go full retard when it comes to everyone's favorite Yellow Family.
sneed.jpg
WHY IS IT THAT HOMER CREATES AN ADDICTIVE CASH CROP WHEN HIS SOIL PH WAS 9.6! IS THIS BECAUSE THE HARVARD WRITERS KNEW WHAT MONSANTO WAS GOING TO DO TO OUR FOOD SUPPLY?

I'm asking the real questions here people!
milhouse-looking-glass.gif
Clowns are funny. RIP Aaron and Max. Do they get a discount on cremation?
 
Pour one out for the poor homie that got brain boozled by the Communist Gangster Computer God.

For real, pity he burned himself to death, he could've been a real kook with his own Dec like fan club.
 

I wonder if this guy was inspired by Aaron Bushnell
Had even forgotten the name, that's how irrelevant it was.
Ver archivo adjunto 5921101

This sign was allegedly found near where the person set fire to himself. Looks like it was a schizophrenic.
He's right about the uniparty, he's wrong about them being fascists tho.
Certified schizo, specially the part about kubrick.
 
Doesn’t read like schizophrenia or at least not the really stereotypical stuff schixos write. No klang associations, no word salad.
As does this one-

"As it turns out, we have a secret kleptocracy: Both parties are run by financial criminals whose only goals are to divide, deceive, and bleed us dry. They divide the public against itself and blame the other party while everything gets worse and more expensive and handful of people take all the money."
Yeah. The only incorrect thing is that it’s not very secret
This is water. Water is liquid life. The fact that water – something we all need to survive – has been bottled up and sold to us at unbelievable markups is evidence of kleptocracy.
A fellow Dr. Strangelove fan .
 
Fire consumed all the air/oxygen in the immediate area. Possibly including inside of his lungs.
apjabdulkalam1-2x.jpg
Burn on, you crazy diamond.

Can't wait until people are setting themselves on fire to bring back the Ribwich at this point.
That his sacrifice was for something insane bothers me. Self-immolation for tasty sandwich seems like it might be likely to be effective. What a weird sad end.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo