- Registrado
- 5 de Ene, 2021
So this I just don't understand. I work as a machine operator in the steel industry. The jobs that I directly interface with cannot be replaced with robots 10,000 miles away. We have to know how to turn wrenches, dress blades, lay cable, troubleshoot (over the phone thanks guys), and be able to adapt bad parts into new life (a 3/8 adapter into a 1/2 adapter). If you have a physical, on site job (what a fucking travesty, what a war crime, what a goddamned sin) you will never be replaced with a jeet over the phone.Since Starlink and Leo now exist, I was wondering how Null and others would feel if immigration was stopped but jobs were done via teleoperation using robots. The tech already exists and its far easier than importing millions of laborers. No one is talking about this labor issue. I made a pic to explain this point.
Edit: formatting.
Ver archivo adjunto 9245304
I will absolutely say "yes PLC technology is a dying breed like COBOL and Fortran. Yes the people who know PLC and COBOL should be paid a <u>lot</u> of fucking money." But that job will never be taken "overseas" because most of the shit that uses these old codes aren't ever connected to the Internet, and if they are connected to an internet, they are not exposed to the broader Microsoft Internet. Exposed just willynilly for any old upgrade that could break the system. Guess what, when Windows updates a random bit of information? Breaks a process 12 years going strong. you need that completely isolated from any thing and anyone.
Who fixes a flat tire? Who fixes a broken pipe? Who fixes a building that caught fire? Who fixes the mess when a stupid fucking coworker stacks shit too high and the metal tilts over, breaks the pallets they were on, punches through a wall, and has 26,000 pounds at a 45 degree angle?
Not robots. Not Jeets. Humans and gas power.
Última edición: