Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Lorne's going pro se (and paper-based)! He's also requested a 14-day extension for his response to the Government's response.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
LORNE ARMSTRONG
DEFENDANT'S MOTION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE MOTION TO GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE MOTION TO DEFENDANTS PRO SE REQUEST FOR EARLY TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE
NOW COMES Lorne Armstrong, defendant, pro se Respectfully files this motion requesting an extension of time to file his response motion to the Governments Response motion to defendants pro se Request For Early Termination of Supervised Rlease. Defendant requests additional 14 (Fourteen) days.
Defendant states that in his initiation motion he requested counsel be appointed to him. It was not until Wednesday, 5-20-26 that defendant learned through USPO Mitchell Oswald that his motion for appointment of counsel was denied and that he would have to either hire an attorney or continue pro se. Defendant states that he cannot afford an attorney at this time and will have to continue pro se. Therefore he needs the extra time to prepare his Response motion.
