Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
Lolcow LLC v. Liz Fong-Jones (1:26-cv-02059, S.D.N.Y.)
🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Lolcow LLC v. Fong-Jones
1:26-cv-02059— District Court, S.D. New York
Docket No.
1:26-cv-02059
Court
District Court, S.D. New York
Filed
11 de Mar, 2026
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
28:2201cp Declaratory Judgment (Copyright)
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
21 de Jun, 2026
Parties (9)
Parties
Doe 7 a/k/a GettrGrifter, Doe 6 a/k/a The Mass Shooter Ron Soye, Doe 5 a/k/a Dread First, Doe 4 a/k/a Teriyakiburns, Doe 3 a/k/a Diggus Bickus, Doe 2 a/k/a Sexy Senior Citizen, Doe 1 a/k/a 3MMA, Zhen Elizabeth Fong-Jones, Lolcow LLC
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 55)
#
Date
Description
Filing
44
21 de Jun, 2026
ANSWER to [1] Complaint,., THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Doe 4 a/k/a Teriyakiburns, Doe 2 a/k/a Sexy Senior Citizen, Doe 6 a/k/a The Mass Shooter Ron Soye, Doe 1 a/k/a 3MMA, Doe 5 a/k/a Dread First, Doe 7 a/k/a GettrGrifter, Doe 3 a/k/a Diggus Bickus., COUNTERCLAIM against Lolcow LLC. Document filed by Zhen Elizabeth Fong-Jones. (Attachments: (1) Affidavit Declaration of Lane Haygood, (2) Exhibit Exhibit A to Haygood Declaration).(Haygood, Lane)
MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: [31] MOTION to Quash Subpoenas (ECF Nos. 13 & 15) ., [34] MOTION for Preliminary Injunction ., [30] MOTION for Attorney Fees . MOTION for Protective Order . MOTION to Quash all extant subpoenas . . Document filed by Zhen Elizabeth Fong-Jones. (Attachments: (1) Affidavit Declaration of Zhen Elizabeth Fong-Jones, (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Fong-Jones Declaration, (3) Affidavit Declaration of Kathryn Tewson, (4) Affidavit Declaration of Lane Haygood, (5) Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Haygood Declaration).(Haygood, Lane)
LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages in Opposition to Motions to Quash and Motion for Preliminary Injunction addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Lane A. Haygood dated 06/22/2026. Document filed by Zhen Elizabeth Fong-Jones. Return Date set for 6/22/2026 at 11:00 PM..(Haygood, Lane)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting 39 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The motion of Marc J. Randazza for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned action is GRANTED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 6/18/2026) (jca) Transmission to Attorney Services/Help Desk. (Entered: 06/18/2026)
The problem here being that you, Elliot, have decided that any and all criticisms of you, especially based on things you have admitted to, on a forum you are not required to read, is bullying and harassment. And that you must shut down said forum, despite 99.999999whatever% of the threads not being about you, And that you must have dossiers prepared on any poster you can identify, so that you can complain to their employer and get them fired. And that you will subpoena any use of your social media profile picture in order to collect more names, ostensibly for copyright infringement even though it's obvious what you're trying to do. (archive)
With their logic you could be in an undisclosed location all by yourself somewhere in the Antarctic in the middle of a communication blackout and you could mutter to yourself “That Elliot guy is an awful person” and he would immediately declare you are bullying him.
With their logic you could be in an undisclosed location all by yourself somewhere in the Antarctic in the middle of a communication blackout and you could mutter to yourself “That Elliot guy is an awful person” and he would immediately declare you are bullying him.
The world can only be fixed by leftists mentally ill retards and their ANTIFA Commune replacing the actual police and executing dissenters on the basis of wrongthink.
Only then will Elliot be happy again, until he goes in front of the firing squad.
The problem here being that you, Elliot, have decided that any and all criticisms of you, especially based on things you have admitted to, on a forum you are not required to read, is bullying and harassment. And that you must shut down said forum, despite 99.999999whatever% of the threads not being about you, And that you must have dossiers prepared on any poster you can identify, so that you can complain to their employer and get them fired. And that you will subpoena any use of your social media profile picture in order to collect more names, ostensibly for copyright infringement even though it's obvious what you're trying to do. Ver archivo adjunto 9109169 (archive)
I've said it before but I don't think anybody would be surprised if Elliot tries to get Alyssa to sue the farms as a way to apply pressure to Null to get him to drop the lawsuit against Elliot.
I've said it before but I don't think anybody would be surprised if Elliot tries to get Alyssa to sue the farms as a way to apply pressure to Null to get him to drop the lawsuit against Elliot.
that's gotta be like super mega extortion if the link could be found, right? Extortion is already a crime but something tells me courts would really not appreciate if you're bringing a lawsuit in the particular bad faith of "we know this is a burden on the defendant but we will drop the case if they drop this other case with a different party."
I wonder if Hardin will use the Jew vs Denims case
The judge found that staring blankly at a screen while playing someone else's work, mumbling something vaguely every 15 minutes was enough for fair use.
Our edits to Elliot's fake and shooped, er sorry totally legit, face pic should fly no problem with that kind of legal precedent behind us.
I like the karma of a clown like Denims fuck up stopping Elliot cold, it appeals to my sense of justice.
(Monkey's paw curls)
You may use the Forbidden Image of Dongless Elliot for memes and clownery as long as you include an image of Denims looking retarded (so, an image of Denims) in the lower-right corner. SAMPLE:
(Monkey's paw curls)
You may use the Forbidden Image of Dongless Elliot for memes and clownery as long as you include an image of Denims looking retarded (so, an image of Denims) in the lower-right corner. SAMPLE: Ver archivo adjunto 9113157
Pretty solid first strike by Hardin IMHO. Hits all the correct points and openly shows Elliot's dishonesty in asking for the DCMA subpoenas and KUSK involvement in such underhanded actions knowing full well what thier client intended to do with said info.
Now we get to see what KUSK is made of.
I don't have high hopes as they've already made several mistakes that I can see. The least of which is getting dragged into Elliott 's personal vendetta and acting outside the realm of law for personal beliefs. AKA assisting in the doxxing of private individuals simply because their client (and the KUSK paralegal troon it seems) don't approve of what they're saying.
I'm more amused by the fact that Erriot's precious photo appears multiple times in the official court documents. Let them go ahead & try to sue anyone sharing the files!
Also this glorious quote from one of the KF posts:
You are extremely ugly and will never be a woman. The harsh light of day does not do you any favors. There was no cooperation with light/photons or The Universe in the taking of this photo. Please put three COVID masks over that smile when you're out in public so that little children are not scared.
Yah the insults are funny but you know KUSK will use them to paint Elliot as the aggrieved party, just some poor widdle trans wyman fighting back against the ebil Kiwi Farms murderers.
With a female judge we really won't know how she will react to the Farms until she starts making some rulings. For now I think Hardin made a good start, lets see whut Randazza tosses in and then how KUSK reacts. They're on the back foot at the moment thanks to several gaff's so I'm curious to see how they attempt to un-say what they said.
Wolman's Motion for the Does is now available, however due to using the horrifying image I'm personally not going to post it.
ECF 31, 32 and 33 here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72460096/lolcow-llc-v-fong-jones/
And probably the top of this page when KF's lolsuit tracker updates.
On the other hand, I will post this from ECF 32
He's leaning hard on that whole "Allegations in a lawsuit can't be defamation." and getting it all on the record.
And something I didn't immediately notice, both Mr. Hardin and Mr. Wolman both manage to never once use a pronoun for Elliot Fong-Jones, aka the defendant.
Wolman's Motion for the Does is now available, however due to using the horrifying image I'm personally not going to post it.
ECF 31, 32 and 33 here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72460096/lolcow-llc-v-fong-jones/
And probably the top of this page when KF's lolsuit tracker updates.
On the other hand, I will post this from ECF 32 Ver archivo adjunto 9119362 Ver archivo adjunto 9119353
He's leaning hard on that whole "Allegations in a lawsuit can't be defamation." and getting it all on the record.
And something I didn't immediately notice, both Mr. Hardin and Mr. Wolman both manage to never once use a pronoun for Elliot Fong-Jones, aka the defendant.
It's been blatantly obvious that LFJ is desperate to delete the last pocket of evidence of his consent accident. I've been waiting for years for a publicly referenceable way to make that charge stick. Wish it didn't require all this, but still.
And something I didn't immediately notice, both Mr. Hardin and Mr. Wolman both manage to never once use a pronoun for Elliot Fong-Jones, aka the defendant.
Yeah I've been checking each filing and admiring Hardin's restraint. His work in this suit is obviously, carefully crafted.
By contrast, all the correspondence from KUSK seems sloppy. They're referencing things by different names, switching justifications and accusations around, and being scattershot with wording. They opened up a lot of procedural weaknesses they didn't need to, unforced errors based on wording or service that doesn't gain them anything except a weak threat against Hardin.
I kind of suspect Haygood is fumbling around trying to salvage some "Plan A" they laid out months ago, and can't react competently to any challenge from Hardin. None of this feels like an adaptive strategy, it's a slow-motion rollout of pre-selected tactics.
