Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votos: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votos: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votos: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votos: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votos: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votos: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votos: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votos: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votos: 35 1.1%

  • Total de votantes
    3,199
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
They don't care. you don't have people on the streets chanting the names of Pedobaum and Huber, both didn't get as striking as an image that helped sell them as a "helpless victim" as Floyd got. Floyd got nigh messiah status, those two didn't.
it's a lot easier to make a single person a messiah than it is to make multiple people messiahs especially when one of them is still alive and comes off as utterly detestable and i am fully expecting there to be riots in kenosha after the trial even if kyle gets guilty on all counts because joggers love to any excuse to break stuff and steal shit.
 
Wow a theory so retarded that even Binger wouldn't try running with it.
Screenshot_20211113-235223_Facebook.jpg
 
Don't forget, there's video of the shooting that shows Kyle at the moment the Prosecution is alleging Kyle pointed his rifle at Ziminsky, and I've heard but never confirmed that the same video is already in evidence so they can use it to help debunk it.
It's in evidence already. Been confirmed earlier in the thread. Now they just have to use it.
 
JFC

PLAYBOARD.CO
1636870125585.png
1636870238199.png


hahaha fuuuuuck.

i think some of them were, but others were just his shitty personality
the prosecution talking down and getting angry at their own witnesses is one thing.
remember the Grandma and Autisitc Photographer?
the photographer caught the Fat One off guard by accusing him of attempting witness tampering.
then you have Binger getting into a subtle argument with Drew Hernandez
him talking down to the wintesses and the judge himself are probably slip ups.
Someone on the stream, maybe Nick, suggested it was a strategy. The judge intentionally ruled in the Prosecution's favor after screaming at them, so he intentionally tried to get the judge to scream at him to get more pity-judgements.
 
Wow a theory so exceptional that even Binger wouldn't try running with it.
Ver archivo adjunto 2715115
Does this moron realize Gaige also wasn't wearing a mask? Why can't they come up with an argument that doesn't also/only apply to the "victims?"

"He shouldn't have been there!"
"He crossed state lines!"
"He had an illegal gun!"
"He wasn't wearing a mask!"
 
Does this moron realize Gaige also wasn't wearing a mask? Why can't they come up with an argument that doesn't also apply to the "victims?"

"He shouldn't have been there!"
"He crossed state lines!"
"He had an illegal gun!"
"He wasn't wearing a mask!"
If they were capable of thinking, they wouldn't be focused on masks. I don't think I saw anyone wearing a mask in any of those videos that wasn't a t-shirt wrapped around the head.
 
The whole "he shouldn't have been there" argument. People are so fucking docile, so passive, so cucked, that they just conceded their cities to violent extremists, they default to the idea that it's okay for antifa/BLM whoever the fuck to destroy peoples' livelihoods, as if they have a fucking right to it. "Yeah, sure, go ahead and destroy property, what can ya do, right? Have fun!"
Given that many protests that start off peacefully quickly degenerate to violence, it's one thing to tell people to stay home in the context of avoiding harm. But the idea that people should stay home in the sense of doing nothing as everything they stand for and worked for gets destroyed is ridiculous, especially since most people have their point where they won't idly stand by and let people buffalo them into a situation that's totally untenable.

Yes, Kyle might have had enough youthful naivete to not expect the magnitude of trouble he ended up in that fateful night given who was out causing trouble, but he shouldn't be flat out discouraged from caring about his community enough to want to make a positive difference, either.

It's a bitch move, but the judge believes in people somehow.
I believe the judge has been very deliberate with this trial. He seems to know it's high-profile enough that it could easily have turned into a three-ring circus and a media shit show 💩 from the start had he not been firm about courtroom decorum and his belief in the legal process when it's done right.

More importantly, perhaps, I think the judge is doing all he can to make sure that neither party would have grounds for an appeal on a technical matter. Any court decision that gets overturned on a technicality makes the original judge look bad as if he or she didn't do their job during the original trial. This judge seems to be very mindful of that and wants to ensure he did everything he reasonably could to ensure a fair trial. Anyone who finds that concept to be fascist didn't pay enough attention in their American Government class.
 
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.

Every. Single. Time.
 
it's a lot easier to make a single person a messiah than it is to make multiple people messiahs especially when one of them is still alive and comes off as utterly detestable and i am fully expecting there to be riots in kenosha after the trial even if kyle gets guilty on all counts because joggers love to any excuse to break stuff and steal shit.
Right now in Kenosha, WI, it's 34 degF with overnight sleet possible.
 
I was looking at the jury instructions and one of the possible paragraphs is
[A person who provokes an attack may regain the right to use or threaten force if the person in good faith withdraws from the fight and gives adequate notice of the withdrawal to his assailant.]
I noticed it says 'force,' rather than 'deadly force.' Am I right in thinking this paragraph won't be shown to the jury, because the previous paragraph already covers duty to retreat when using deadly force?
[However, if the attack which follows causes the person reasonably to believe that he or she is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm, he or she may lawfully act in self‑defense. But the person may not use or threaten force intended or likely to cause death unless he or she reasonably believes he or she has exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm.]
If so that would avoid the 'adequate notice' language that could be problematic for Kyle.
 
Right now in Kenosha, WI, it's 34 degF with overnight sleet possible.
Joggers don't like it went it dips near freezing or below, Kenosha's winter will save the city from another riot.
I was looking at the jury instructions and one of the possible paragraphs is

I noticed it says 'force,' rather than 'deadly force.' Am I right in thinking this paragraph won't be shown to the jury, because the previous paragraph already covers duty to retreat when using deadly force?

If so that would avoid the 'adequate notice' language that could be problematic for Kyle.
The chomo literally chased Kyle, so he's good.
 
Joggers don't like it went it dips near freezing or below, Kenosha's winter will save the city from another riot.
You ever see anyone rioting in a parka? All ready to rumble with the cops in their snow pants? Using their fucking ice scrapers as improvised weapons?

White boy popped some other white boys and you're between me and a hot cup of soup? GTFO.
 
I was looking at the jury instructions and one of the possible paragraphs is

I noticed it says 'force,' rather than 'deadly force.' Am I right in thinking this paragraph won't be shown to the jury, because the previous paragraph already covers duty to retreat when using deadly force?

If so that would avoid the 'adequate notice' language that could be problematic for Kyle.
I maintain a jury can look at that and just as easily conclude pedobum was provoking the attack with his actions throughout the night.
 
You ever see anyone rioting in a parka? All ready to rumble with the cops in their snow pants? Using their fucking ice scrapers as improvised weapons?

White boy popped some other white boys and you're between me and a hot cup of soup? GTFO.

I'm with the joggers on that one. It's downright balmy in Wisconsin right now compared to many years.
I like cold weather, below 32F is fine with me, 'course I have three different parkas, an extreme cold weather parka, 4 pairs insulated and waterproof pants and three pairs of winter/snow boots (to match my various gloves/hats/scarfs/balaclavas so I'm ready to throw down in the snow. In style, its NYC.

yes I know that's a bit weird but I love the no jogger weather
 
I like cold weather, below 32F is fine with me, 'course I have three different parkas, an extreme cold weather parka, 4 pairs insulated and waterproof pants and three pairs of winter/snow boots (to match my various gloves/hats/scarfs/balaclavas so I'm ready to throw down in the snow. In style, its NYC.

yes I know that's a bit weird but I love the no jogger weather
Wisconsin tends to get a bit below that. Full weeks of below 0 being the high temperature. They really should have just had the trial in January or February, absolutely nobody at all would even think of rioting in that weather.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo