Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votos: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votos: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votos: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votos: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votos: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votos: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votos: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votos: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votos: 35 1.1%

  • Total de votantes
    3,199
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Yeah, but look at it my way: a bit of pain, some blood, only happens once...
True. But if Grosscrust's cheek had been vaporized instead of his byecep (or even his gun-hand), he would've been able to flaunt it & prosecution would've had a huge sympathy advantage. The only reason he couldn't was because he couldn't wear a short-sleeve shirt on the stand.

And had he been iced on the street that night, he wouldn't have been able to make such a disasterous prosecution witness. Given the divine efficiency of Rittenhouse's previous shots, it's like Kyle didn't miss, but instead hit exactly what he needed to hit.

Even the near-miss on Jumpkick Chimp was brilliant. Of all Kyle's attackers, that's the one the state could've nailed him for killing/maiming. And since he's never come forward for a dip at the font of clout (even anonymously), I'd be willing to bet that individual has at least seriously reconsidered his life choices since that come-to-Jesus moment in the street.
 
I'm the expert on editing.
PicsArt_11-11-02.09.43.jpg
 
And on top of all of this... why the fuck didn't the prosecution (and the defense for that matter) sit down and do 30 minutes of research about this topic so they aren't asking exceptional questions that makes it even more clear that they don't know what they're talking about!!!
They don't teach that shit at blackmailing school.
 
I feel like I'm watching a student presenting the poorly slapped project. This is just painful.
 
Well, now the court knows why Dr. Black's hourly rate is so high. The prosecution's "Expert" knows less than the average YouTube thumbnail artist.
It's literally not his job. His job would be to make something bigger, and then they'd use that for leads on things like "who this might be" and "identifying possible suspects". Not "Testify about the program he uses".
 
Why have they saved the most excruciatingly boring testimony to close out the trial?
It is boring, but at the same time it's fun watching the prosecutor "expert" screw Binger over even more. He tried to sneak shit in yesterday, and was told to bring an expert in to verify what he was saying, and this guy is basically one giant "IDK bro".
 
Remember Kiwis, as much as every Twitter and Reddit user wants to make this political, this is not a political case.

People tried to murder a child, the child shot them before they could, despite their best efforts.

Any sane person can see it's self defense and anyone who says it wasn't is either heavily misinformed or just plain evil.
 
Why is this so hard to understand or properly ask: When you increase resolution of an image, it means pixels are added. Where do these come from and how do they know which color they are? If you just make a larger version (ie: turn one pixel into like 9 identical ones) that's not a big issue, you just get a larger image that looks like ass. But when it smoothes borders, it smushes detail. When some sort of AI enhancement shit is working in the background, it might mean the software sees a shadow or random artifact and goes "Oh right, this must have been a cat!" and insert the image of a cat from some database.

Now they argue for 10 minutes over pixels and changing colors with an expert that doesn't know how the software works. This is so weird.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo