Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votos: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votos: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votos: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votos: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votos: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votos: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votos: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votos: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votos: 35 1.1%

  • Total de votantes
    3,199
  • Encuesta cerrada .
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
From what I can see, the Left aren't paying as much attention to this trial as the Right, as evidenced by their opinions of it being more divorced from reality than Imaginationland. They also don't have as much fervor over it as they did the Chauvin trial.
On the Rakieta stream, shortly after the trial ended for today, they noted that some corporate outlets were kind of minimizing the Rittenhouse story on their websites while maintaining focus on Jan. 6. At least one person speculated that it was because the outlets are realizing this trial isn't going their way so they're trying to minimize the impact, whereas they can ride Jan. 6 all the way until the next election. Dems presumably realized BLM riots and Portland shit actually hurt them electorally and don't want to have more riots pinned on them.
 
From what I can see, the Left aren't paying as much attention to this trial as the Right, as evidenced by their opinions of it being more divorced from reality than Imaginationland. They also don't have as much fervor over it as they did the Chauvin trial.
Which does make sense. Chauvin was important to the golem of BLM, but Rittenhouse is only reeeeeally important to those who would want their golem to be useful.

And the problem is that you kinda need the golem interested to make them terrorize people into submission.

It's really weird that Krauss threw an angry bitchfit for like 20 minutes on that subject
Its placement was great, right at the end of a deliberately boring presentation. It only left Kraus with one thing to focus on, with severe legal implications, and the jury will only ever remember it.
 
yeah. i saw an autist misinterpreting the statement "do you want to add anything" to "do you want to change your statement". IT WASN'T EVEN RELATED TO THE KYLE CASE YOU DUMBFUCK AGENDAPOSTERS
Not to dogpile but the autist said he didn't have anything to add despite being shown new footage of the events and not necessarily stuff that he personally witnessed and the pros still pushed.
 
they get paid to burn time and it was a standard cross, expanding on the statements. the photographer started having anxiety
They spent all that time verbally beating up a friendly, likeable autistic man, which won't play well to a jury.

It might be a completely innocent mistake. It's incredibly weird that Krauss focused so strongly on it if it was.
 
They spent all that time verbally beating up a friendly, likeable autistic man, which won't play well to a jury.

It might be a completely innocent mistake. It's incredibly weird that Krauss focused so strongly on it if it was.
Also, prosecutors are salaried and don't get paid by the hour. They literally get no extra money for taking more time.
 
Última edición:
I might be late and gay but has anyone made this connection yet?

Uncanny.

PicsArt_11-09-10.41.13.jpg
 
They spent all that time verbally beating up a friendly, likeable autistic man, which won't play well to a jury.

It might be a completely innocent mistake. It's incredibly weird that Krauss focused so strongly on it if it was.
Didn't they also chide him into using bicep man's ridiculous last name despite his obvious speech impediment? That struck me as a little fucked up.
 
a severe lack of willing footsoldiers.

In Kenosha the last footsoldiers got blasted by a frumpy teenager, it can't be easy to find someone willing to step over the dead bodies of Rosenbaum and Huber to be next in line to tussle with Kyle.
 
Nah, that one is standard. Makes it easier to remember when the court reporter types it up and hands it to the jury.
Can't we just go with the highly convenient and memorable nicknames provided by the farms?
Defendant: Kenosha Kyle
Complaining Witnesses: Pedobum, Skate&Die, and Lefty
Unnamed witnesses: Mr. Yellow Pants, Jump-Kick-Man
Prosecution: Wide Boy, Binger (no change needed)
Defense: Hard R, Agent 47
 
I mean, like, active genocide. Death camps and all that. The passive genocide has been going on for decades, but it's recently begun accelerating at a breakneck pace. The establishment is openly encouraging minorities, particularly black people, to kill whites whenever possible. Historically, you get maybe a few years of that tops before the boxcars arrive.

They tried it out in the 60s but realized they be were boiling the frog too quickly. Now the water's just a few degrees away and nobody has any idea how hot it's gotten.
They are doing this currently in South Africa. It's illegal to talk about in Europe or America. It's easier to just make self defense illegal, criticism of immigration at all illegal, being white illegal, fire white people from their jobs, teach minorities to hate white people in schools to provoke attacks, then let the minorities do the killing for them, optics problem solved.

By the way minority on majority genocide has absolutely happened before. The massive soviet killings were all Jewish on Slav genocides, not just mindless political killings.
 
Didn't they also chide him into using bicep man's ridiculous last name despite his obvious speech impediment? That struck me as a little fucked up.
It seems petty, but I'm pretty sure that's standard operating procedures. They want to have consistent names when recording things.

EDIT: Cougar'd

I might be late and gay but has anyone made this connection yet?

Uncanny.

Ver archivo adjunto 2703935
I see this

Ganondorf_Artwork_%28Ocarina_of_Time%29.png
 
Última edición:
From what I can see, the Left aren't paying as much attention to this trial as the Right, as evidenced by their opinions of it being more divorced from reality than Imaginationland. They also don't have as much fervor over it as they did the Chauvin trial.
So that calms my fears for now
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo