Jew Conspiracy - Where and how did it first started?

[raskogr]

But you see how the see-saw effect would work here, right? The Russian empire treats the Jews like shit, so when this revolution signs on, they join up en masse. Revolution wins, antisemitism is made illegal as essentially one of the spoils of victory. But then the power within the revolutionary government shifts, and the Jewish faction (or, at least, the faction that contains the bulk of the Jews, however that works out) fall out of favor, and suddenly antisemitism is cool again. One of those vicious cycle things.

Yeah, that's how it seems to be with a lot of things, like homophobia for example. I'm not saying Jews 100% dindu nuffin, obviously their own actions have led to conspiracy theories and anti-semitism, but at the same time the actions of the gentiles have led to this too. It's a shame. If people just didn't treat each other like shit in the first place there wouldn't be a problem.

 

[Lemmingwise]

To me that would feel like the US or the rich are conspiring, not the Jews.

When I write ultra-rich I don't mean the Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos of the world. In the grand scheme of things they are nouveau riche. I mean Rothschild's, Rockefellers and european aristocracy (particularly UK and Dutch). Those that are never put into the Forbes' richest, because nobility doesn't count and besides, they have learned to hide their assets much like how Rothschild's first got their biggest riches on napoleon's defeat by having superior control over information.

There is no real limit to the wealth of the these. They just print money and own your debt, which is also created out of thin air. It is not entirely accurate to say that they are jews; Rothschild's are, most Rockefeller's aren't. European Aristocracy isn't. But by all accounts, the distribution of power is predominantly in jewish hands even among the elite (mainly due to overwhelming influence of the Rothschilds). This can also be derived by watching what interests are best served on a global scale.

If you doubt this balance of power, there is a simple image to make you reconsider. Rothschild with UK royal family. There is a strict protocol not to touch British aristocracy. But some people are above such matters, like Evelyn de Rotschild.

 

[Krokodil Overdose]

I've always seen the Jews like the Chinese, at least in my country. They're both longstanding communities that have originally come from somewhere else, are generally intelligent and do well in society, and they keep to themselves and have a low crime rate. Although they do some annoying things, especially regarding money, and haven't really assimilated into mainstream society they're generally not a problem. Yet it's the Jews who are the subject of conspiracy theories even though the actions of the Chinese government are comparable to anything the Jews and/or Israel are accused of. Maybe it's because the Jews have had a longer presence in Europe than the Chinese have, or maybe it's because based right wingers are too busy trying to get a qt azn gf to find a final solution to the CQ problem?

There's a few contributing factors to this, I think. First, the Jews are long-established as an insular minority population in Western countries- long enough to have built up quite the reputation, for better or worse, while the Chinese are relatively recent additions. Second, the kinds of businesses Jews gravitate towards tends to put people on edge; nobody loves their landlord or mortgage broker, even if that person is flawless and above-board. Third, Chinese (or at least east Asians in general) are visually distinct from the rest of the population in western cities; there's no Chinese equivalent of the "fellow white people" meme, and the visual distinction reduces paranoia by making members of each group instantly identifiable.

 

[raskogr]

There is a strict protocol not to touch British aristocracy. But some people are above such matters, like Evelyn de Rotschild.

There have been many instances where people have touched members of the royal family or broken royal protocol in some petty way and nothing came of it, that doesn't really say much to me besides the arrogance of that man.

But by all accounts, the distribution of power is predominantly in jewish hands

It's undeniable that Jews are disproportionately represented among the wealthy, but "predominantly"? I doubt that the majority of the ultrarich are Jewish, even if a significant number of them are.

Here are the 10 richest people who aren't royalty or dictators (the Rothschilds aren't royalty or dictators so surely they'd be included here?). 6/10 are white gentiles, 7/10 are of American nationality, only 3/10 are Jewish. This is pointing more towards whitey and the Americans to me.
I know you said you "don't mean the Bill Gates or Jeff Bezos of the world", so let's use your example of Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and Europeans aristocracy. You said yourself that not all the Rockefellers are Jewish and I'm willing to bet there are more European aristocrats than Rothschilds and Rockefellers. Most European aristocrats are of German descent, funnily enough, so wouldn't that point more towards a German conspiracy?
The ultrarich are a people of their own that don't represent any one demographic.

 

[Lemmingwise]

the Rothschilds aren't royalty or dictators so surely they'd be included here

They have been Austrian nobles since 1822 and also British nobles since 1847.

Edit:

Most European aristocrats are of German descent, funnily enough, so wouldn't that point more towards a German conspiracy?

Indeed most are of German descent. And sure the ultra rich are a class of their own. Though the British royalty by action certainly didn't seem to share any kinship or shared destiny with the Germans. I think it matters what value is given to one's descent as well.

Your reasoning is sound. I typically don't include the aristocracies in these discussions because the things they get up to behind closed doors are undoubtedly bizarre and beyond what most people could stomach hearing, but in the grand scheme of things, their conspiracies are either better concealed, or of lesser significance. Of course they too intend to rule forever. It's really an impossibility for nobody in the world to have the ambition to do so. And of all those that have the ambition of doing so, somehow for various reasons some specific people will succeed in being close to fulfilling that ambition. Wealth creates wealth and power begets power. When I say "specific people" in that sentence, it's not a vealed allusion to jews, btw.

Once those power gravitates towards the most succesful of people with that ambition, then it becomes sensible to study it best you can, because there is no greater mover of the world.

From my various studies, there is a very significant part that is jewish and zionist. The parts that are not naturally so have to adhere to it in order to belong. Jewish is honestly a bit of a misnomer, much like right/left makes sense as simplification when you start learning about politics, but it becomes a hindrance once you get deeper into it.

 

[raskogr]

They have been Austrian nobles since 1822 and also British nobles since 1847.

Nobility =/= royalty
Regardless there are definitely more white (particularly German) nobles than Jewish ones.

 

[raskogr]

there is a very significant part that is jewish and zionist.

There is a large portion who are not Zionist though, Jewish or not. George Soros, for example, has tried to push his open borders agenda in Israel but was rejected and is hated in the country. Not to mention he ratted out his fellow Jews, including his own family, to the Nazis and has said that he doesn't regret it, so he can't feel much affinity to the Jewish people.
There probably are strange dealings going on behind closed doors, but I feel like mostly these people are out for themselves. If there are conspiracies going on I'd imagine they'd be within the families and not the entirety of the ultra-rich or European aristocratic class. The several families probably compete and are distrusting of each other, creating alliances and breaking them off, backstabbing each other, etc. There's probably a fair amound of in-fighting within families too.

 

[Lemmingwise]

Nobility =/= royalty
Regardless there are definitely more white (particularly German) nobles than Jewish ones.

The number of people doesn't matter, because the power between individuals (or rather: between families) isn't equal.

Investopedia estimates the Rothschild wealth to be 2 trillion, which means it would be more than the top 10 billionaires you have listed. Why Forbes doesn't list it? According to newsweek it's because forbes doesn't list royalty or dictators. You're right that technically they're not royalty. Whatever the exact reason, it isn't listed.

Why Putin Isn't on 'Forbes' Billionaires List

Could be because list doesn't include "dictators who derive their fortunes entirely as a result of their position of power."

www.newsweek.com

 

[Lemmingwise]

There probably are strange dealings going on behind closed doors, but I feel like mostly these people are out for themselves.

Again you describe this by "I feel" which I think is illustrative. I'm not sure why looking out for their interests can't include kinship interests. And it's possible to have infighting while also being a unified front to the external. (heck many parents have such a relationship towards their children, though ostensibly with more benevolent intent)

 

[raskogr]

Again you describe this by "I feel" which I think is illustrative. I'm not sure why looking out for their interests can't include kinship interests. And it's possible to have infighting while also being a unified front to the external. (heck many parents have such a relationship towards their children, though ostensibly with more benevolent intent)

Well, the aristocrats have always sought to maintain and further their families' positions of power, that's how it's been since the middle ages. They're more interested in family ties and aren't concerned with the dealings of common people. I'd imagine they'd identify more with other aristocrats of different ethnicities than with commoners who share their ethnicity. I believe most of their actions concern each other and only affect us normal people indirectly.

 

[Lemmingwise]

I'd imagine they'd identify more with other aristocrats of different ethnicities than with commoners who share their ethnicity

I don't think who they identify with is necessarily the root of where their priorities lay. It may be as simple of wanting ample supply of organ donors. For that you need people of similar genetic background for the best matches. I don't know the exact reasons for the motives, I only know the research I've done over the years, which is hard to all collate into one small conversation, but it seems to indicate that what you're imagining here is not the case, or at least, not the driving factor of the driven agenda's.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Should we give some kudos to the guy who posted that text about Jews and Bolsheviks? https://www.unz.com/article/lying-about-judeo-bolshevism/

The writing and discussion of Jewish historiography in contemporary mainstream academia requires a sublime choreography. It’s basically a series of evasions resembling dances, in which facts are presented and parried, and flamboyant narratives are advanced which everyone knows to be false but which emerge repetitively and shamelessly. My attention was first drawn to Paul Hanebrink’s A Specter Haunting Europe: The Myth of Judeo-Bolshevism by Christopher Browning’s recent glowing review, titled “The Fake Threat of Jewish Communism,” in the New York Review of Books. Browning is an establishment historian with a record of legally assisting Jews — for the right price. As well as receiving over $30,000 from Deborah Lipstadt to testify against David Irving, Browning has testified against a significant number of European ex-soldiers at war crimes trials.

Although his most notable work, Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland (1992), contains the less than remarkable thesis that war turns ordinary men into killers, Browning’s dedication to the Jewish narrative has led to his becoming a true guru of Jewish victimology. Having received awards and funds from organizations including Yad Vashem and the USC Shoah Foundation Center and copious promotion in mainstream media and academia, Browning’s certificate of praise in the field is potentially career-making. Evidently, he has chosen to bestow his magic touch on Paul Hanebrink. In this essay I want to explore the approach of both Browning’s review and Hanebrink’s text as exercises in the manufacture of duplicitous histories.

I had to look twice at Browning’s headline. My first thought was: “Really? You really want to take this subject matter on? You really think you can ‘debunk’ the facticity of Jewish Communism?” Such an endeavor would unquestionably require abundant chutzpah, but it is clear from the very beginning of the review that this will be an effort of evasion rather than outright debate. As Browning states in the opening paragraph, “Hanebrink’s approach is not to repeat what he considers an error of the interwar era—the futile attempt to refute a myth on the basis of historical facts and statistical data.” Although this evasion is predictable, it’s quite remarkable to see a more or less open admission from two allegedly masterful historians that they don’t possess facts sufficient to dispel the very “myth” they set out to challenge. To describe any such presentation of facts as a “futile attempt” seems intellectually flaccid; a concession of the weakness of one’s case.

 

[Lemmingwise]

Should we give some kudos to the guy who posted that text about Jews and Bolsheviks

Unz is one of the jews that is willing to be critical of some of the jewish holy cows, or at least seems to be based on what I've read by his hand.

 

[AssRapistDude1488]

The Jews did 9/11 and that’s why I like them.

 

[Kaiser Wilhelm's Ghost]

Not sure if this was posted before (I couldn't find one of this topic, but it is a legitimate question.)

From the horrific shooting in Pittsburgh to "casual anti-Semitism" to a Muslim politician making remarks about Israel, it makes me wonder where does this conspiracy of Jews stem from? Why are Jews usually the source of conspiracy theories and hate from multiple walks of life?

Sorry if it's a sort of cliffnotes version, there is a lot of material to cover and a lot that needs to be left out.

Historically it started first with the attitudes of the Persians towards the Jews and then further the Romans.
Judaism itself was a relatively unique religion during the time period when all of the surrounding cultures were polytheistic, the Jews were monotheistic and had been a regional powerhouse in the area with the rise of the Israelites after the exodus and reached the ultimate peak of its power under the leadership of King Solomon.

The Jewish Kingdoms, both Judah and Israel fell apart during the invasions of the Persians and then later the Romans, despite the best efforts on parts of the Persians and then latterly the Romans the Jews managed to prevent any major cultural invasions of their new conquerers, even to the point of having been sent out of the traditional territory of Israel, by the Persians and the destruction of the 2nd temple by the Romans and the renaming of the kingdom to that of Palestine.

These were the initial building blocks that would form the European roots of antisemitism. Jews because of their cultural and familial ties as well as religious obligations tend to do well as introduced outsiders, one group is the portion of the Jewish diaspora that would adopt the local customs of the invaders and practice their religion, and the other group the Zealots would practice without any sort of acclimatization to outside culture. The Persians thought that by removing the Jews from the territory they would be able to disinherit them from their homeland, and the Romans later thought that through destruction of the temple, (an act of reprisal) they would be able to culturally dispossess the Jews as a people.

At the time of the Roman occupation, Palastine was a dangerous part of the Roman Empire, as there were strong Jewish nationalist movements in the territory and the imposition of Roman rule, law, and the pantheon came into conflict with the Sanhedrin and the Pharisees. This along with home grown movements pro Jewish, such as the zealots, and the expansion of apocalypse prophets in the area such as the early Christian movement, contributed much to the Roman cultural idea of negativity of the Jews as a religion. Especially as Jews being citizens of Rome were free to travel, and so you had self sufficient Jewish communities springing up in parts of the Mediterranean and elsewhere.

As Christianity took hold and started to spread, the early church came into conflict with Jews as well. In part because there was a theological disagreement over the divinity of Christ, and also because the Jews themselves considered Jewish converts to Christianity to have removed themselves from the Jewish community by allowing gentiles and others into the religion and not practicing all of the laws of Leviticus that were superseded.

As a result resentment started to form between the two communities, and once Christianity had gained prominence as the dominant religion in the Empire, the Jews became hated for the fact that they hadn't converted to the new religion, and then on top of that the early Roman church started to hold the view that Jews were to blame for the persecution of Christ. (Because under Roman law a man could not be tried for apostasy, the Sanhedrin through Caiphus and Herod had to come up with the charge of apostasy and Pontius Pilate as governor was the man who signed off on it, since all extension of rabbinical law needed approval of the Roman consul in the area.)

By the time that the early middle ages came to pass, with the failure of the Roman empire, and the establishment of the new Christian kingdoms, laws were passed with a view of preventing Jews from being able to interact in typical franchises in competition with local businessmen. This created parallel industries, where you had Jewish goods and services, such as doctors and the like, which only balkanized any interaction between the two parallel communities further.

The only interaction between the two communities came in a form that cemented the pernicious stereotypes that exist to this day. Tax collection and usury. The Catholic church forbade the collection of taxes from Christian to Christian and also any form of interest charged on loans. As a result, the local lords would employ Jews in the forms of bankers, loan businesses, and tax collectors. So aside from being the medieval form of the IRS, they also were the loan sharks, and the majority of those loans would have been to the wealthier elites of the Europe, so any collection enforcement would have added to the creation of a negative feed back loop.

A good example of this idea of the two different realities is the interactions in the Merchant of Venice between Shylock and Bassanio. Bassanio borrows money from Shylock he can't afford to pay back, even though the two hate each other openly.

Also historical context abounds of different powerful banking dynasties of Jews being established in Europe, Aaron of Lincoln is a fine example of just how powerful some of these money lenders had become.

The reason they were attracted to money lending, it was a way to increase their wealth with relatively little work outside of the risks put up through collateral. It also gave them access to power and privileges through contacts with the European elite that were outside the purview of their craftsmen bretheren, and so a lot of Jews became involved in this type of business venture. Since they operated in clans it also helped solidify the idea that they worked cooperatively against European interests.

The Jews as a result were scapegoats for a lot of evils through the middle ages.

They were second class citizens, with no actual rights above what the local law and rulers of the country afforded them. They could be removed at any period, and have their property seized, and for any number of reasons they were persecuted in Europe. An example would be Philip the IV of France who deported all Jews from France after seizing all money and properties, around the same time he forcibly dissolved the Knight Templar for heresy.
The Templars like the Jews had been expert bankers, and Phillip it would seem did not want to return the 3 million marks that he'd borrowed from the order to wage war on England and the rest of the smaller French principalities.

The fact that they managed to survive the plague better by living in ghettos, having better doctors and practicing the Talmuds hygienic laws also led to speculation that it had been the Jews who had intentionally brought the plague to Europe to kill Christian.

They also were accused of poisoning water during cholera and other outbreaks, though all evidence for this seems to point to actual attempts by the local Jews to purify the water rather than any maleficence.

All sorts of stuff that would be used as evidence by a majority group versus a minority group once mass hysteria had set in. Just like witch burnings, antisemitism was often based on unfounded hatred or cultural misunderstanding.

This sustained period of religious and physical persecution along with the reinforcement of the negative stereotypes towards disenfranchised Jews, as well as fears about competition from local populations of orthodox or just culturally practicing Jews that refused to integrate fully with the Europeans led to consistent persecutions of Jews in Europe that would flare up occasionally into full blown violence throughout the 17th, 18th, 19th, and 20th century and didn't realistically end in most of Europe until 1945 with the end of the 2nd World War.

The antisemitic movements in Europe that would fuel Nazi's ideology and philosophy as well as lending an air of legitimacy to the well held Jewish conspiracies of the period and fueled the final solution were merely an eventual but inevitable build up of the attitudes of persecution and antisemitism along with a modern biased press, and an increasingly influenced general public, which led to a mass imprisonment and then liquidation of European Jews as a matter of course, when repatriation to a different country was no longer an available option to them.

In an ironic twist the creation of the Jewish state came directly out of the actions of the the SS and the attempts to eliminate Jews in Europe. The Zionist movements had existed before that in sporadic influence, with a lot of settlement in British mandated Palestine done by orthodox Jews and in the form of Kibbutz's, small communal farming communities. The liberation of the European Jews along with the disenfranchisement of the Jews in their home European countries supercharged the Zionist movement, and led to the development of the nation of Israel which the British were happy to give them because the Arabs in the area were considered ungovernable.

The main conspiracy theory that evolved after the war, the Jewish control of media came from two fronts, one the war time propaganda that was put forward by the the German foreign and domestic news services was that the US and Britain were being run by Jewish banks, and that the media outlets of these countries had been infested by Jews who took control and were running the show. (Never mind that prior to declaring war, those same Jew infested American companies funding Britain's war efforts were funding Germany as well.)

The second and legitimate part of this conspiracy is the part that was aided by the expulsion of creative Jews from Europe. The majority of early American Jews settled in parts of Brooklyn and New York, and from there started building businesses. One of the new pioneering ideas that Edison had come out with was the invention of the earliest form of movie cameras, and a large chunk of money that aided the development of this was from entrepreneurial Jews trying to cut into a new industry.

The issue with the burgeoning east coast film studios was one Edison patented everything, and New York law at the time meant that copyright meant royalties on all pre-existing patents, even if the innovation was a new design. Since Edison had the first "moving picture camera" it stymied any real expansion of films outside of nickelodeons or other short developments. The second issue was sunshine. Film cameras of the period required massive amounts of natural light, and the only game in town again was Edison. So a lot of east coast Jews moved their film making operations to Hollywood, because it was outside of the restrictive patent copyright laws, and it had lots and lots of sunshine.

What solidified the Jews run the media conspiracy, was as these west coast outfits started to innovate and make a new industry in the terms of films, a majority of European Jews who had started to suffer under Germany and its antisemitic laws. (Prussian laws which were already restrictive only became worse under the NASDP, which prevented all Jewish directors from making or taking part in the German film industry.

Which at that point in time, was an actual rival to Hollywood in terms of production, if not output.) As more Jews migrated to Hollywood, and were given welcome places in the new industry they began to dominate it, in terms of studio funding, writing and directing, and this eventually would have a spill over effect into other media industries due to Jewish collectivism and nepotism.

As for Jewish persecution elsewhere in the world, it has been varied.

Jews managed to flee and find safety in Japanese occupied Shanghai and Canton during the war. The irony being is that the Japanese did not recognise the German antisemitic laws, and so it was the one place in the axis that any remaining Jews who had not been able to get out before the declaration of war had the opportunity to flee from Reich controlled or influenced territory.

In Russia there had been a multitude of pograms in order to control or limit Jewish influence in society, leading the the laughable publication of "The Protocols Of The Elders of Zion" which in turn fueled much of the European and American grown antisemitism. It experienced a brief periods of relaxation when the Soviet government supported by Jewish communists and intelligentsia revoked the Tsarist "Pale of Settlement" act which had proscribed Jewish religious rights, and ethnic identity and forced them to live under a system of persecution.

The irony being that under the new Communist system, religious freedoms disappeared, synagogues were seized along with property and religious leaders removed from positions of power. They at least had equal rights under the law, and Lenin used them to secure the government of the USSR. Under Stalin this all changed when realizing that there was a large Jewish influence in the party, and they had effectively outlived their usefulness started to purge them out of Russian society.

The largest source of modern antisemitism and Jewish conspiracy is the middle east and Islam.

In order to understand the animosity one needs to understand the source. The two religions despite being Abrahamic, do not share the same origin story. The Muslims consider themselves to be descendants of Abraham through his illegitimate first son Ishmael father of all Arabs.

Where as the Jews consider themselves to be descended from the second though legitimized son Isaac. Both consider the prophecy laid out in the bible/talmud about the first son born to Abraham to be a legitimate claim to being God's "Chosen People" the argument is about which son.

Added onto this is the fact that Muhammehd came into the same problem that the earlier Christians had, when he started his war lording and forcible mass conversions of the people around the deserts and the conquering of the city of Mecca the Jews in the region and around would not convert to the new religion. Even though it was the legitimate successor of all prior religions. (Christ is considered a prophetic being in the Quran, and Christians are just misguided) as such the Jews through the interactions with the new religion, and already existing religious, tirbal, and historical animosities, (The Jews had when not suffering from major outside military intervention, had always been a regional power and furthermore aggressive against the smaller less organised neighbors,) really fueled a hatred of Jews which in turn ended up being part of the Quran and further commentaries prescriptions to genocide all ethnic and religious Jews.

Come the creation of the state of Israel by the British with American pressure and funding, they probably didn't think that the Jews would make a go of it, and would be flattened by their Arab neighbors, but at least it would shut the wealthier Jews in their own home countries up.

What happened instead is that the Jews determined to fight or die started illegally arming themselves by mass producing resistance style weapons from the period, sten guns, and other assortments as well as illegally acquiring arms or machining tools from US firms that were sympathetic, and legally acquiring arms from elsewhere.

The experiment with arms productions, as well as each successful victory against the Arab armies in the area eventually led to a cooperation between the western powers and the Israelis, as Israel ended up becoming a western style democratic power in a traditionally fundamentalist tyrannical middle east.

The reason that funding has been kept up to this day is because despite the ongoing issue with Palestinians (ethnically Jordanians, but they don't want them because they're literally just obsessed terrorists at this point) they act as a counter point to the two main powers in the region, Iran and Saudi Arabia, both of which despite being Muslim are bifurcated into the two majority belief systems in Islam, Shia and Sunni. Both of which claim to be the only legitimate followers of Mohammehd and butcher each other accordingly when given the opportunity.

(EDIT was to flesh out more details and add in some stuff I'd forgotten first time round.)

 

[Super-Chevy454]

I saw this mention of a article posted in June 2018 from the Times of Israel and I think that article could be mentionned in this thread. https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-lawmaker-lauds-supremacy-of-jewish-race ( http://archive.li/rfAd5 )

A lawmaker from the ruling Likud party said Wednesday that the “Jewish race” is the smartest in the world and possessing of the “highest human capital,” which is why, he said, the Israeli public did not buy into the allegations of wrongdoing by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

MK Miki Zohar made the comments during a radio debate with veteran political journalist Dan Margalit about the corruption investigations in which Netanyahu is either a suspect or has given testimony.

His assertions led to a Twitter spat with Joint (Arab) List party MK Ahmad Tibi, who noted Nazi Germany’s treatment of Jews as a race during the Holocaust.

I wonder if that guy search for trouble or what? It's like almost as he did on purpose to keep the conspiracy going like the Energizer bunny?

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Sorry for the bump everyone. I don't know if this blog post fit this thread, but that won't help to stop fueling conspiracies. http://www.unz.com/article/amazon-bans-the-secret-relationship-between-blacks-jews/#new_comments

The banning of four Nation of Islam Black history books by Amazon, the largest bookseller in the world, provides a perfect opportunity to examine the wickedly racist ways Jewish power is wielded in America. Amazon provided no warning, no reason, no hearing, and no opportunity to respond—it was a blatant mockery of Amazon founder Jeffrey Bezos’s own creed, “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” It is, however, perfect proof of what The Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad said: the mental resurrection of Black people will anger our oppressors and cause them to react punitively and viciously.

Bezos’s book purge came in the midst of the extraordinary political spectacle engineered by an awakened Congressional wonder woman named Ilhan Omar. Her exposé of the Zionist-Judaic underbelly of the American political system happened in the most unflattering way. Rep. Omar asked, “Why is it ok for me to talk about the influence of the NRA, of fossil fuel industries, or Big Pharma, and not talk about a powerful lobby that is influencing policy?” She was referring to AIPAC, of course, the most powerful foreign lobbying group, which, while protesting that it was powerless, promptly brought ALL the business of the United States of America to a screeching halt to demand an instantaneous group hug from the 535 Congressional members on its payroll!

Rep. Omar’s adroit maneuver exposed the fact that 12 of the top 20 political donors to the American election system are Jewish Zionists, their money amounting to a whopping 78% of the total contributed. What began as a campaign to officially repudiate, isolate, and control this freshman Muslim phenom, dramatically backfired. In effect, she forced the nearly all-white boys’ club to go on record to condemn “discrimination and bigotry against minorities as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contrary to the values and aspirations of the United States.” Symbolic, for sure—but Dr. King couldn’t do it; Pres. Obama couldn’t do it. It took but a few weeks and a tweet for Ilhan Omar. She even signed the resolution. For the first time, the annual March meeting of the AIPAC caliphate will have far more attention than it wants, and Omar’s political star rises ever higher.

It’s been that kind of year for the satanic “Jews,” who have had a hell of a time trying to keep alive a plausible mythology about themselves while maintaining control over their gentile brethren and over the non-white world. From all angles and directions new research has chipped away at the holy patina that almost everywhere surrounded in solemn reverence these unholy imposters. A review of the litany of recent Jewish and Israeli crises is in order:

• The United Nations issued a report that accuses Israel of “war crimes” when its forces killed 189 people and shot more than 6,100, most clearly unarmed. Israeli “snipers shot at journalists, health workers, children and persons with disabilities, knowing they were clearly recognizable as such.”
• Jewish historians now admit that today’s brutal occupants of Palestine are genetically unrelated to any of the good people in the Bible, thus establishing that their 71-year tyranny in the holy land is but another white supremacist colonization scheme.
• Though Israel is one of 200 nations on earth, a google search of the general term “apartheid state” results in nothing but Israel-related articles. And that is reinforced by a damning United Nations reportconcluding that Israel “has established an apartheid regime that dominates the Palestinian people as a whole.”
• The Boycott, Divestment, & Sanctions Movement (BDS), which has isolated the apartheid state, has forced Israel to take ever more desperate and repressive measures.
• The “war in Syria” was exposed as an Israeli oil theft operation.
• There is the increasing momentum of charges that Israel masterminded 9/11and that Israeli operatives are the likely suspects in the continuing false-flag terrorism attacks around the globe.
• So despised is the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) that it was run out of its “racial mediator” role in last year’s Starbucks incident by a single tweet from activist Tamika Mallory.
• The Women’s March continues to grow in influence and power despite Jewish attempts to undermine its progress.
• American police departments with atrocious records of racism and shootings in case after case are shown to have been “trained” by ADL and Israeli forces.
• Artists and athletes are refusing to perform in Israel, and Black Lives Matter blindsided the ADL with their policy statement on Israel which says that Israel is “complicit in the genocide taking place against the Palestinian people.”
• The manipulation of “anti-Semitism” statistics by the ADL—which were found to be inflated by thousands of “anti-Semitic incidents” that were committed by a single Israeli Jew—has been exposed.
• A series of sexual harassment and human trafficking crimes by Jewish men of wealth and prestige has been exposed as epidemic. Names like Weinstein, Lauer, Epstein, Dershowitz, Moonves, Kraft are appearing with unseemly regularity.
• Morris Dees was unceremoniously fired from the organization he founded, the Southern Poverty Law Center. The SPLC is the “race issues” arm of the ADL, and has scammed millions from unsuspecting and fearful Blacks and Jews, claiming to be America’s “hate watchdog.” Dees was fired for sexual harassment and for creating an intolerable climate of racism toward the group’s Black staff.
• The opioid epidemic—which is now said to be responsible for at least 100 deaths a day—is being laid at the doorstep of the billionaire Jewish Sackler family, owners of Purdue Pharma, makers and relentless pushers of OxyContin. The devastation on the workforce is so extensive that Fed chairman Jerome Powell said in a recent 60 Minutes segment that the OxyContin scourge is negatively affecting the U.S. economy.
• Harsh Jewish condemnations of the awakening voices of Black critics of Israel, like Angela Davis, Tamika Mallory, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Marc Lamont Hill, Michelle Alexander, and Alice Walker, have only brought them Black hero status.
• The exposure of Israel’s secret and ongoing espionage operation against Black youth in America, called “Israel Cyber Shield,” was a fatal blow against the alleged Black–Jewish “alliance.” The COINTELPRO-like operation is responsible for the attacks on the above-mentioned Black thinkers, as well as the instigation of Amazon’s book purge.
• Israel’s longtime face of Apartheid, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was indicted for corruption. His leadership of the now internationally acknowledged genocide against the Palestinians has made it nearly impossible for Israel to maintain international toleration.
• Netanyahu merged his right-wing party with the “Jewish Power” Party, the most racist party in Apartheid Israel. And this follows the Knesset’s passing of the nation-state law giving civil rights only to Jews.
• The Talmud, the ancient Jewish rabbinical writing that the Israelis would like to make the law of the land, has come into intense scrutiny as a document that says Jesus deserved death by being boiled in excrement and that his blessed mother, Mary, was “a whore.” Israel’s chief rabbi called Black people monkeys, admitting that he learned that from the Talmud.
• Christian churches in Israel continue to be defaced and burned by Jewish gangs.
• The college cheating scandal to admit less-than-deserving rich kids to elite schools was masterminded by a Jewish man and brought focus on other, past college scams that benefitted Jews.
• Black Jews in America are now in open revolt against white Jews, with their main spokesperson, Nylah Burton, publicly declaring, “that the only way to fix the Black-Jewish alliance is to destroy it….We need to destroy the idea that Black people owe white Jewish people support because some Jews marched with Martin Luther King more than half a century ago…” Black Jews in Israel have long suffered discrimination, poverty, and police violence.
• Boston Globe columnist S.I. Rosenbaum had to admit what the Nation of Islam has always known: “A shocking number of Jews have become willing collaborators in white supremacy.”

 

[Lemmingwise]

Ah so kevin macdonald's culture of critique wasn't the only book burned by amazon.

For anyone wanting to learn more about the influence of jewish lobby, defamation is a documentary that examines parts of that, although it's focused more on ADL than AIPAC.

Now I want to warn viewers that this is made by a horrible right wing white supremacist.

Oh no, wait, it's made by an israeli jew. That's probably the only reason why it's still on youtube.

 

[theo102]

It starts as evil, then becomes narcissism which expresses as false identity and manifests as the actor. In Judaism these actors were called Pharisees. Pharasaism developed into Rabbinical Judaism, in which halachic authority became entwined with secular politics. As a system it asserts religious legitimacy but practices the opposite of the ideals of that religion.

 

[theo102]

There's the old torah, (which is just the old testament) genesis through Deuteronomy, and that's as much a part of christian tradition as Jewish, so I'm not sure why only Jews would get the advantage of this.

The separation of Christianity from Judaism was about the covenant of circimcision, which was only for the twelve tribes of Israel. This played out through the Council of Jerusalem where only four points from the law of Moses were taught to those who wishes to convert, although learning the law of Moses was hinted at.