Jew Conspiracy - Where and how did it first started?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm unapologetic about being an anti-Zionist, though I've never “swallowed the Jew pill,” as it were.

From my point-of-view, the Jews are probably the most “successful” of the people groups associated with handling money. People often forget that this type of profession existed in other parts of the world for centuries, and that different countries have different “money handlers,” as it were.

In India, the stereotypical “money handler” would typically be Hindu/Muslim Gujaratis or Jains, of all religious groups. Jains are particularly noteworthy because of their strict commitment to the principle of non-violence. They were historically merchants, traders, or bankers due to said commitment.

In the Levant, the Druze and Syriac Christians have long since occupied the role of “Semitic religious minority that the Arabs persecute” ever since all the Jews fled to Israel. Despite the persecution, the Druze and Syriac Christians are, more often than not, highly well-connected economically and politically in countries like Syria, Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon.

If Israel didn't exist as a country, the Jews would more than likely be in a similar boat to their Druze and Syriac brothers – as yet another broadly Semitic minority group that handles money and gets targeted by the occasional mullah or shaykh.

Knowing that other people groups have similar aspersions cast about them in history, who's to say that the Jews are the only group with motivations and interests? Absolute power corrupts absolutely, but handling money comes pretty damn close.
 
Rabbis in the US suck bloody baby dicks after circumcising/mutilating their penis which has led to the deaths of multiple babies from herpes.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=LOkhPBYpqkgTry not to be antisemitic challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)

You're talking to someone from the Third World. You act as if I should be immediately outraged and change my stance on Jews because the Orthodox rabbis are paedophiles.

Spoiler alert: paedophilia and pederasty are (unfortunately) extremely common phenomena that occur in hyper-religious regions of the world.

That Orthodox rabbi (and all of his ilk) are equally degenerate in my eyes as the same mullahs and shaykhs who prey upon boys and children due to religion warping gender dynamics. Those two groups, are equally degenerate, to the fucking incestuous Mormons who prey upon sheltered children.

I will wax poetic about how much I want the disgusting apartheid state known as Israel wiped off the face of the planet. I will gladly jump in on thread activity that shits on Israel. But I just can't bring myself to bring that same level of hatred and vitriol to Jews as a whole.
 
It's really not hard. It's nepotism continued through generations, and passing their collective knowledge to the next generation (whether it be the Talmud, usury, or whatever) is literally most of what Jews do. Whites could do it too, if they banded together as tightly as Jews.

As to where it started? It started when they rejected Christ. Aggressively utilizing usury also got them places.
 
You're talking to someone from the Third World.
Communism sure did a number on those countries, huh? I wonder what I'll find if I look into communism...

You act as if I should be immediately outraged and change my stance on Jews because the Orthodox rabbis are paedophiles.

Spoiler alert: paedophilia and pederasty are (unfortunately) extremely common phenomena that occur in hyper-religious regions of the world.
You seem more upset at me for posting about it than about the Jews mutilating and sucking thousands of baby dicks. How about instead of just reflexively defending Jews with a bunch of whataboutism you actually use your brain and think critically. Does that sound like a news report about pedophiles? Why is it relegated to 2 minutes on the local news? Would any other group get that sort of treatment?

I will wax poetic about how much I want the disgusting apartheid state known as Israel wiped off the face of the planet. I will gladly jump in on thread activity that shits on Israel. But I just can't bring myself to bring that same level of hatred and vitriol to Jews as a whole.
You ever considered that Israel is awful because it's full of Jews? There is no getting around it. You don't have to hate them or think every single Jew is bad, but they are objectively the shittiest people on Earth. The experiment has been run hundreds of times. The results are clear. Stop being a pussy and trust the science.
 
"The jews control everything and are ruining my heckin life which is why I will continue to do absolutely nothing about it and bitch incessantly on autistic internet forums"
t. half the goys in this thread
 
You seem more upset at me for posting about it than about the Jews mutilating and sucking thousands of baby dicks. How about instead of just reflexively defending Jews with a bunch of whataboutism you actually use your brain and think critically. Does that sound like a news report about pedophiles? Why is it relegated to 2 minutes on the local news? Would any other group get that sort of treatment?

Again, implying that the Druze and Syriac Christians don't have their share of disgusting secrets behind closed doors and don't receive special treatment from local governments/news agencies. I've seen the Orthodox rabbi thing shared countless times, and it's just a drop in the bucket for me.

You ever considered that Israel is awful because it's full of Jews? There is no getting around it. You don't have to hate them or think every single Jew is bad, but they are objectively the shittiest people on Earth. The experiment has been run hundreds of times. The results are clear. Stop being a pussy and trust the science.

What science? The creation of Israel was handled by the British. There have only been two nation-states founded explicitly on the pretence of religion, both of them created by the British, and both of them causing widespread violence and bad blood to this day: Israel and Pakistan. The overwhelming majority of my vitriol toward Israel can also be applied to Pakistan, but perhaps with more venom as there's more than just one ethnic group split between country lines.

***

I'm sorry Sir Shapiro, but this is a point of incontrovertible difference between us. You view the world as rife with Yehoodi trickery. I view the world as infested by a Zionist plague. We share overlap, but our foundations are irrevocably different and I get the feeling this is gonna be a circular argument going forward.
 
Again, implying that the Druze and Syriac Christians don't have their share of disgusting secrets behind closed doors and don't receive special treatment from local governments/news agencies. I've seen the Orthodox rabbi thing shared countless times, and it's just a drop in the bucket for me.
There's that whataboutism he was talking about. "But the Druz/Christians HAVE to have skeletons in their closet, and even though I have shown nothing to prove this, that means they HAVE to be at least as awful as the Jews, whose actions I've seen proof of. In fact, whatever Jews did is just a drop in the bucket."

Are you aware how intellectually dishonest this is?
What science? The creation of Israel was handled by the British. There have only been two nation-states founded explicitly on the pretence of religion, both of them created by the British, and both of them causing widespread violence and bad blood to this day: Israel and Pakistan. The overwhelming majority of my vitriol toward Israel can also be applied to Pakistan, but perhaps with more venom as there's more than just one ethnic group split between country lines.
The country headed by Churchill, a famous shabbos goy, and the country containing the headquarters of the Rothschild bank (which has had its hands in British royalty for years), created a Jewish ethnostate. But nevermind that. Let's care about Pakistan. that's clearly more important. (I particularly like the "more than one ethnic group" statement. Hey retard, Semites, Ashkenazim, and Arabs are different ethnic groups.)
 
There's that whataboutism he was talking about. "But the Druz/Christians HAVE to have skeletons in their closet, and even though I have shown nothing to prove this, that means they HAVE to be at least as awful as the Jews, whose actions I've seen proof of. In fact, whatever Jews did is just a drop in the bucket."

Are you aware how intellectually dishonest this is?

Take unsubstantiated anecdotes with due grains of salt; I'm not asking you to treat me like an authority on the subject. I only intended to give my opinion (itself an amalgam of second-hand/third-hand accounts of such groups), not get into a proper academic debate.

The country headed by Churchill, a famous shabbos goy, and the country containing the headquarters of the Rothschild bank (which has had its hands in British royalty for years), created a Jewish ethnostate. But nevermind that. Let's care about Pakistan. that's clearly more important. (I particularly like the "more than one ethnic group" statement. Hey retard, Semites, Ashkenazim, and Arabs are different ethnic groups.)

It is significant, to me because I'm a South Asian and Pakistan is equally impactful in South Asian geopolitics as India is. All the while, it draws the same level of bad press to the region as Afghanistan.

The creation of modern-day Pakistan has a ton of eerie parallels to the formation of Israel. This is no surprise because again: the British themselves responsible for both states of affairs.

1. At the time of the partitioning of Pakistan, more arbitrary borders were drawn without regard for pre-existing boundaries that, themselves, were already ill-defined. In Pakistan's case, we have the Radcliffe and Durand lines splitting apart Balochis and Pathans in the West, Kashmiris to the North, and Punjabis and Sindhis in the East. The British and French already had Sykes-Picot fucking up the Middle East, but the British fucked it up even more by creating Israel. Both states were also founded explicitly on the basis of religion. Israel fears Iran, yet I'd wager Pakistan is their blood brother that they should be worried more about because they're the nuclear-armed Muslim power that Iran so desperately wishes it could be.

2. I cannot, in good conscience, say that the entire geopolitical situation about the Golan Heights is parallel to Kashmir. Though it must be said: heavily militarised no-man's lands at high altitudes with no shortage of brutal repression on both sides? That's gotta be worth something, right? (This is the haziest point I could make, you may criticise this one all you want).

3. While I don't refute your statement about Churchill's Jewish trickery being directly responsible for the creation of Israel, I view him as a Zionist first and a Jew second.
 
I'm unapologetic about being an anti-Zionist, though I've never “swallowed the Jew pill,” as it were.

From my point-of-view, the Jews are probably the most “successful” of the people groups associated with handling money. People often forget that this type of profession existed in other parts of the world for centuries, and that different countries have different “money handlers,” as it were.

In India, the stereotypical “money handler” would typically be Hindu/Muslim Gujaratis or Jains, of all religious groups. Jains are particularly noteworthy because of their strict commitment to the principle of non-violence. They were historically merchants, traders, or bankers due to said commitment.

In the Levant, the Druze and Syriac Christians have long since occupied the role of “Semitic religious minority that the Arabs persecute” ever since all the Jews fled to Israel. Despite the persecution, the Druze and Syriac Christians are, more often than not, highly well-connected economically and politically in countries like Syria, Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon.

If Israel didn't exist as a country, the Jews would more than likely be in a similar boat to their Druze and Syriac brothers – as yet another broadly Semitic minority group that handles money and gets targeted by the occasional mullah or shaykh.

Knowing that other people groups have similar aspersions cast about them in history, who's to say that the Jews are the only group with motivations and interests? Absolute power corrupts absolutely, but handling money comes pretty damn close.
Generally speaking the difference is that while there are many tiny elites like jews, none of them are as "toxic" as the jews. Chinese for example are the elite in many asian countries, there's backlash, but never like with jews since they tend to assimilate, and don't get hyperpolitical like the communists who installed de facto jewish minority rule, or push holier than though agendas like "tikkun olam".

Also I'm calling bullshit on the argument that jews were excluded more than they secluded themselves, 99% of people in the middle ages were peasants or laborers, and jews have always looked down on workers. I read an article about how if a jew did manual work he wouldn't find a wife and was viewed as the lowest of the low, even in the last centuries when they were fully emancipated.

There weren't even many jews in the west but due to the population expansion they ballooned from a few thousand merchants to millions, so you might call judaism the most successful religion ever considering its size. Even today the haredis are breeding like rats, other elites don't seem to have any "reinforcement" groups like that. And it's not as if they're all poor like some people want you to believe, lots of the big heads are filthy rich from the diamond trade and african mines.

Considering all this it's ironic that many famous atheists are jews, because without organized religion they wouldn't exist, after all it's the most eugenic and supremacist religion out there, even today, only judaism requires dna tests.

Though I guess some of the brahmins, etc. in the west are jewy in the way they cry about whitey bad and colonialization while being way wealthier than the average white person, having benefited from an ancient caste system.
 
The thing that annoys me about the talk of Jews online is that it's always USA Jews and they are extrapolated to everywhere else.

Like the UK is an easy example, the Jews are more right wing, the press there is notoriously anti-Israel and the left party is proudly antisemitic. Didn't help them making their country a shithole. Arab countries had Jews living in them relatively uneventfully for centuries until Israel came about, and despite that, this days a good chunk of them have good relationship with Israel due to economics/common enemy. Israel itself is a stated ethnostate with culture and social norms as opposite as leftists reform Jews as possible.

And the worst thing is that those USA Jews can't be called Jews. They don't keep any religious law, they don't believe in god, they outright despise the core parts of their religion. Most of them are Mullatos. But they'll call themselves Jews because the social credit in it is too much to miss out.
 
whoa theres a lot of jews in businesses
thats crazy its almost as if judaisms one of the largest religions
Ethnic Jews are like 1.5% of America. Also, Judaism is a tiny religion and one that is not even practiced by most "Jews in businesses". Most Jews don't even see religion as a necessary or even important component of being Jewish. There are probably more Wiccans than followers of Judaism.

The people that know the least about Jews are always the quickest to defend them.
 
You mean the Elites?

Well when I played Crusader Kings, we often expelled the Jews when debts came due. (Historical strategy game set in 1400-1600)
We were the Kings, so we made our own rules, took their assets, and kicked them out

IRsTDqWMSu8N7mssJdVv0KrZA4WI7hNM.png

The only country that attempted to expel the Jews in Modern History were the Nazis

During WW2 in March 1938 Nathaniel de Rothschild (One of the most powerful Jews in the world at that time) were captured by the Nazis and held for ransom

He was released only after lengthy negotiations between the family and the Nazis and upon payment of $21,000,000, believed to have been the largest bail bond in history for any individual.[7] Despite appeals from Queen Mary of the United Kingdom and possibly the Duke of Windsor, Rothschild was held in Vienna's Hotel Metropole while the German government attempted to expropriate his business concerns.[9] He was imprisoned at least through July 1938, and his property placed under control of a German "commissioner".[10]

Within 3 years, the US would be attacked by Japan at Pearl Harbor, apparently unprepared, yet conveniently the majority of its forces were out on exercises. Allowing them, at nearly full Naval strength, to enter WW2. We know what happened afterwards. Germany is still villified today as the greatest evil the world has ever known. While the Jews are portrayed as the most victimized, yet one of the most powerful ethnic groups in the world.

Recently, whats become of the country that attempted to expel the Jews and held a Rothschild for Ransom?


migrants.jpg
232.jpg
Over 1,200 women were reportedly sexually assaulted during the 2015–16 public New Year's Eve's celebrations in Germany. Multiple women reported being raped. In many of the incidents, women in public places had been surrounded and assaulted by groups of men.[11][12][13][14] The Bundeskriminalamt (German Federal Criminal Police) confirmed in July 2016 that 1,200 women had been sexually assaulted on that New Year's night.[1]


What happened to the Europeans that stood back during the Nazis Jew expulsion and imprisonment before the war?
D3zOpMyXkAIWqNt.jpg ae105dce5327fefd8d59a43aea77af98.jpeg

Maybe we are really paying the sins of our ancestors.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo