Jasper Carewatch - ASPCAck-Ack-Ack

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Instead of expending the physical effort involved in cleaning/changing the cat litter, I bet he went to the mall or whatever that supermarket he likes and spent $50 to buy a few packs of expensive premium brand plug-in air-fresheners and odor-killing aerosol sprays.
That and/or one of those ludicrously-priced automatic scoopers, that don't actually work unless you're looking for a contraption to fling litter and cat shit all over the floor.

Fuck the inventor of those, by the way. There's a special place in hell reserved for people who create specialty appliances that supposedly do things no person wants to actually do but don't work, and then sell them for exorbitant prices. They can take a seat in Cocytus right next to Phil.
 
Are we still on board that he got the cat personally declawed? Because that would indicate he got it very young and most likely at that point he didn't rescue it from the shelter.

But also he had his bidness in mind if he rescued a cat already declawed also. Since I saw the little shit messing with his soundproof foam which was hilarious. Because he really tried to spin it like the cat was in that shelter for soOoOooOo long that he had to get him.

I personally do not believe him because Phil hasn't owned an animal in his life and yet he loves them so much. Not counting the caged animals or his family rabbit when he was a wee little boy. For him to say he loves animals out of nowhere feels very strange to me since it is Phil and he really doesn't give a shit about anything or anyone except himself.

Just a thought since the aftermath of the reveal where he's exploiting the cat. Which is absolutely dying down just as I suspected.
 
Are we still on board that he got the cat personally declawed?

I'm not. Although the whole "came from Arkansas" story seems farfetched, as someone from the South, there are plenty of dipshits who would get a cat declawed, decide they don't want it, and give it up to a shelter. Shelters are often overrun due to the number of backyard breeders, so they not infrequently send animals to other shelters with fewer animals (often up north).
 
I'm not. Although the whole "came from Arkansas" story seems farfetched, as someone from the South, there are plenty of dipshits who would get a cat declawed, decide they don't want it, and give it up to a shelter. Shelters are often overrun due to the number of backyard breeders, so they not infrequently send animals to other shelters with fewer animals (often up north).
Figured I would ask. It's one of those thoughts that flew past my head because I really never knew declawing a cat was a thing. Mainly mad at other things at the time but cooled off from the whole thing.
 
I'm not. Although the whole "came from Arkansas" story seems farfetched, as someone from the South, there are plenty of dipshits who would get a cat declawed, decide they don't want it, and give it up to a shelter. Shelters are often overrun due to the number of backyard breeders, so they not infrequently send animals to other shelters with fewer animals (often up north).
Excuse me, I checked again what he said: "...Arkansas, (which you'd pronounce like Arkansaw), or something like that, like somewhere in the Midwest or something..."

However, the Midwestern US states are: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota and Wisconsin.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwestern_United_States

If it's truly in the Midwest, Arkansas is not on it, however there is an Arkansaw in Wisconsin, which is in said region.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansaw,_Wisconsin

Could he be referring to this one, instead of the state?
 
Are we still on board that he got the cat personally declawed? Because that would indicate he got it very young and most likely at that point he didn't rescue it from the shelter.
Based on the story Dave told, I'm of the mind that one of two things happened. And, each one is predicated on how much this ass boat lies about everything and anything.

1. Phil absolutely had the cat declawed. It was his condition for getting his horse an actual companion. He's always one to think that "more expensive = higher quality" and his first thought was that a curious kitty would destroy all the high priced lemons he has laying around the WaKahndo. The horse went along with it because she likely genuinely wanted a cat.
Reasoning for this: Story details. Cat was transferred from some other state and sat in this particular shelter for months and months and months because nobody wants declawed cats, and it tugged at their heartstrings enough to bite the bullet and get the runt of the litter. This cat came from somewhere, no documentation in transfer, happened to be already declawed, and is as young as he is... To me, this is all suspect. Now, I know that cats do get declawed young. Animals do get transferred to other shelters (when they facilitate transfers for the purpose of adoption... Washington state shelters wouldn't just call up a shelter in Arkansas, or some other 'midwest' state, and say "Hey, do you have any really young, declawed, domestic tabby cats? You do? Send it here! We want to let him sit for months!").

2. Phil didn't get the cat declawed, as he was already declawed and this was what Phil was looking for when going to adopt the cat. He wanted a less dangerous to his stuff cat to appease his horse, and this was a compromise they both made.
Reasoning for this: On the surface level, his story isn't entirely implausible, just extremely unlikely. The things that he's said that torpedo the whole thing is the nature of the transfer of the animal. Again, some shelter a half-country away isn't just going to request some random-ass animal for shits and giggles. If an animal is listed on their site, and someone out of state wants to adopt it, they will absolutely perform this act. But not "just because." If he had admitted to finding Ja$per in a shelter in some other state, said "that's the one!", paid the rehoming fee, and they did the rest...there's not much to argue about. In that instance, everything is above board (and while he could still be lying about everything anyway, which is always a wildcard) and he could actually be taken at his word for once. However, he always has to embellish on practically every event in his life, nothing is normal, everything is some herculean task. A boring adoption tale just isn't for Dave. A Little-Mac tale where the unwanted scrub gets picked up by the ultimate underdog in an epic tale of coincidental happenings....thats the shit Dave gets behind.
 
To be honest I don't give a shit about the declawing. I would never have declawed my cats nor would I ever suggest to anyone I know that they do so with theirs. If you care that much about the arms of your couch then get a different pet. Don't mutilate your animals because you don't want to put up with their instincts.

My issue is that, like with so many things with Phil, we'll never know the truth. Short of something as unlikely as Kat turning on him and making an account here to spill the beans we're not going to know if it was him, or her, or Jasper's previous owner, and so to me it doesn't matter. Not attributing blame but delving too much into it to me smacks of looking for reasons to slap Phil's name around, and if you're really digging then you're both blind and pissing in the wind.

It was a dumbfuck move of him to even mention it to begin with because I highly doubt we'll ever see enough of Jasper for anyone to actually notice it otherwise. That people are fixating on it doesn't make sense to me.
 
I’m a few weeks late, but it just occurred to me he should have named the cat Two-Grand Sam, a play on Toucan Sam, the Fruit Loops mascot.


Please be patient, I have autism.
 
1am Gin Instagram photo making it
3 post about Jasper this month
1 of Khat for 2 years going

A strong marriage aye?
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • Screenshot_20190815-040019_Instagram.jpg
    Screenshot_20190815-040019_Instagram.jpg
    341 KB · Vistas: 212
Based on the story Dave told, I'm of the mind that one of two things happened. And, each one is predicated on how much this ass boat lies about everything and anything.

1. Phil absolutely had the cat declawed. It was his condition for getting his horse an actual companion. He's always one to think that "more expensive = higher quality" and his first thought was that a curious kitty would destroy all the high priced lemons he has laying around the WaKahndo. The horse went along with it because she likely genuinely wanted a cat.
Reasoning for this: Story details. Cat was transferred from some other state and sat in this particular shelter for months and months and months because nobody wants declawed cats, and it tugged at their heartstrings enough to bite the bullet and get the runt of the litter. This cat came from somewhere, no documentation in transfer, happened to be already declawed, and is as young as he is... To me, this is all suspect. Now, I know that cats do get declawed young. Animals do get transferred to other shelters (when they facilitate transfers for the purpose of adoption... Washington state shelters wouldn't just call up a shelter in Arkansas, or some other 'midwest' state, and say "Hey, do you have any really young, declawed, domestic tabby cats? You do? Send it here! We want to let him sit for months!").

2. Phil didn't get the cat declawed, as he was already declawed and this was what Phil was looking for when going to adopt the cat. He wanted a less dangerous to his stuff cat to appease his horse, and this was a compromise they both made.
Reasoning for this: On the surface level, his story isn't entirely implausible, just extremely unlikely. The things that he's said that torpedo the whole thing is the nature of the transfer of the animal. Again, some shelter a half-country away isn't just going to request some random-ass animal for shits and giggles. If an animal is listed on their site, and someone out of state wants to adopt it, they will absolutely perform this act. But not "just because." If he had admitted to finding Ja$per in a shelter in some other state, said "that's the one!", paid the rehoming fee, and they did the rest...there's not much to argue about. In that instance, everything is above board (and while he could still be lying about everything anyway, which is always a wildcard) and he could actually be taken at his word for once. However, he always has to embellish on practically every event in his life, nothing is normal, everything is some herculean task. A boring adoption tale just isn't for Dave. A Little-Mac tale where the unwanted scrub gets picked up by the ultimate underdog in an epic tale of coincidental happenings....thats the shit Dave gets behind.

Another thing to consider toward the 'D$P had the cat declawed himself or required any potential cat to have been already declawed ' theories is how D$P talks about the psycho cat he grew up with. Couple this with how D$P acts around the cat , how reluctant he is to pick the cat up and the way he picks 'his little angel' up. He always looks like a person holding an infant with a dirty diaper not a loving pet owner with their beloved pet. Additionally, he's visibly flinched away from the cat which is not something one does unless they are afraid of being scratched.

As to the 'visits to the doctor', we all know how D$P is when it comes to semantics. He when he said who had an appointment, did he say Kat or cat? Something to think about as we know if it ever comes out that those visits were Vet visits, he'll point this little nugget out as to why he wasn't technically lying.
 
Última edición:
HERE IS 100% PROOF THAT PHIL DID NOT GET JASPER DECLAWED!

his mom paid the vet bill so his mom was the one who got it declawed, nudnik
 
Something that bothered me about the post 2k reveal Instagram spread is that all the pictures seem to have been taken on the same day. Surely someone who has had said cat for 9 months or more would have pictures from those past months. Pictures where the cat wasn't wearing the same collar with the bell in the same place. No pic of Je$ter with the Christmas tree? No cute pic of Je$ter playing in wrapping paper Christmas morning? No pic of him on his brand new cat tree momma Brunell bought for him? I am torn between the cat being a recent purchase or it having been hidden until the bandages came off and it had learned how to walk again. For months, while saying they wanted a cat, but could not afford one, it was also mentioned them going to shelters in the area and looking at cats. Why go t a shelter to 'look at cats' IF you have a cat and have had said cat for months and months? Is Je$ter not enough and they felt they needed more variety so they went to visit cats they had no intention of adopting? Did they keep going to shelters on their precious day off together shopping for another declawed cat to bring home and be a companion? Things don't add up to me.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo