It doesn't matter how you feel about AI

This might scare you, you may not like it

But OP is a fag.

I don't use AI. I find it well, useless at this point in the game. Let me know when it makes major breakthroughs that benefit all mankind and not just a handful of old men with too much money. I have no desire to chat with bots or have them search for me when I can do it myself. I didn't even like Smarter Child. Also this:
chatbots and video generators they keep censoring and lobotomizing to the point they act somehow below cleverbot and bonzi buddy levels of coherence.
 
But OP is a fag.

I don't use AI. I find it well, useless at this point in the game. Let me know when it makes major breakthroughs that benefit all mankind and not just a handful of old men with too much money. I have no desire to chat with bots or have them search for me when I can do it myself. I didn't even like Smarter Child. Also this:
I always found chatbots a fun novelty but I really don't ike how after this ai marketing hype and the ai hysteria shit sparked up they've been treated as somesuper new and scary bad thing that drives people insane and makes them want to date robots.

I'm just over here currently watching the easily broken google chatbot going on a tirade doing fucking homestuck love quadrant shipping based on the recent legal case for some reason and going "ok so how the fuck did we get here specifically and why does this require a massive several datacenter situation"?
1769872402853.png
 
Evolution has been about an animal that can catch 1% more food thriving, and it's competitors dying.
>Used contraction "it's" instead of possessive "its."
>OP likely depended on an AI autofill when typing, clearly lacks proofreading and/or basic grammar skills.
>Opinion immediately discarded.
 
Well, yes. Given how fast it's been evolving, you can safely assume that it will be able to automate away most of low-level white collar jobs, that primarily deal with editing documents on a computer. And if it won't, it'll still make performing those tasks so easy that it'll greatly lower the demand for extra staff and a lot of employees will become redundant.
Everyone denying this is just coping.
"Pandora's Box is open and all the new things coming out of it look really cool, suck it, chuds!"
Funny you should say that cause chuds were the ones welcoming it while leftists were the ones in the opposition.
who the fuck spends 30k on animation programs
Clearly the 30k are the labor costs, animation is well-known to be expensive.
The future of what? we've already concluded that "better" art made by AI loses appeal because it's not human produce.
People only care if it looks bad, it's the same with CGI.
 
Clearly the 30k are the labor costs, animation is well-known to be expensive.
Yes but the way it was framed was like just as a singular short animation made by someone rather than a company, of course it's gonna be expensive if you're paying the animators, because it's how jobs work.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=MAnRzeTlMGcHow I feel may be causally impotent but don't tell me it doesn't matter
The original video's audio is better than whatever this is. The immensely compressed slayer: raining blood as the thunder and wind picks up will never not be incredible.
 
Yes but the way it was framed was like just as a singular short animation made by someone rather than a company, of course it's gonna be expensive if you're paying the animators, because it's how jobs work.
Yeah, but the point was that soon you won't have to hire animators to do it for you, you'll just be able to pay a small fee for a video-generation service and generate everything yourself.
 
AI is the future. Whether you like it or hate it, doesn't matter. It is inevitable. Evolution has been about an animal that can catch 1% more food thriving, and it's competitors dying. Every tool mankind has made is to make things more efficient.
Don't care didn't ask

You're a manichaeist scumbag who thinks creation is an accident and existence is inherently evil. Get fucked.
 
My biggest concern with AI isn't the capital being thrown at it or it putting people out of work, but stagnation for those that use it. It's cool that I can tell a machine I need some code or a script to do something at work, but what if I get complacent? There's already tons of people doing their job by just throwing AI generated code into production. If that happens to too many people, at what point do we run out of progress to be made from using it? What if AI only has other AI generated content to lift from and things stagnate because no one is learning how to do these things on their own anymore?
 
Sure, but it still needs a lot of fine-tuning and trial & error to become acceptable (for medical purposes for example, not anime images).

Only in here this would qualify as bait, OP isn't sharing a hot take, or cold take... or anything extreme.
 
On the other hand, I can take a picture with my Google Pixel 10 Pro XL, throw it into a text message, and then ask Gemini to give whatever the subject of the image was a throbbing penis and it just does it. Like it doesn't even fight me about it.
 
Well, yes. Given how fast it's been evolving, you can safely assume that it will be able to automate away most of low-level white collar jobs, that primarily deal with editing documents on a computer. And if it won't, it'll still make performing those tasks so easy that it'll greatly lower the demand for extra staff and a lot of employees will become redundant.
Everyone denying this is just coping.
This is the type of shit I'm talking about. AI shills actually believe that we're just one tiny step away from full on sentient skynet AI that will replace most white collar jobs and let us have self driving cars or whatever. Just one miniscule step away bro. Trust me bro.

Will AI play a part in speeding up these processes? Sure, I've used chatgpt for projects more times that I can count. But you can't just outsource your entire engineering department to a retarded text prediction program. The HR department? Maybe, but something that demands active thinking and brainpower can not be replaced by AI because AI does not actually think. Do you even have a basic understanding of this technology?

It's always this vague tone they have too. You talk like a scummy eastern European politician would if you asked him when he will get around to fixing up the local town roads, "oh I don't know, maybe AI will play a huge part in our lives somewhere in the future. Can't say how or when but it's entirely possible. Hmm, yes, possible. Likely. Even. When will this happen? Oh well, who's to say? Somewhere in the future, for sure. If it is to happen, that is".
Yeah, but the point was that soon you won't have to hire animators to do it for you, you'll just be able to pay a small fee for a video-generation service and generate everything yourself.
>soon
I'm a practical man, that's why I study engineering. Give it to me straight doc. How long will the RAM shortage last until this is achieved? The next month? Next year? Next decade, maybe? Before proton decay? Give me a rough ball park estimate.

Once again this is what I outlined in my first post. Nigger who gives a fuck about animation? You're trying to sell me on this new technology and this is the best use you could come up with? You're describing a black box that will be used for automating entire job sites but more importantly it can shit out ugly, uncanny AI slop art and animations.
 
This is the type of shit I'm talking about. AI shills actually believe that we're just one tiny step away from full on sentient skynet AI that will replace most white collar jobs and let us have self driving cars or whatever. Just one miniscule step away bro. Trust me bro.
I don't care if you trust me or not, just don't come back crying when nobody's hiring junior engineers cause their tasks have been taken over by AI.
 
AI's biggest benefits are given to the tech industry, we need the bubble to pop so we can assess what is a gimmick and what is actually useful. We're in a lot of ways repeating what we saw in the .com bubble. The biggest use case normies are using for AI is for entertainment generating images, making sora videos, and developing mental illnesses treating an LLM like a friend. That, or essentially using it like Google on steroids. Prior to 2022, one of the unspoken skills for tech workers is knowing how to properly Google search terms. I see it in kind of a similar way now with LLMs knowing how to phrase prompts. Outside of that, we're overvaluing what AI is promised to do. I don't trust pedophiles kikes like Sam Altman, and Nvidia is clearly overvalued to begin with.

The other legitimate use case for AI is for healthcare and research, but that has been around since like 2010's and I consider that cemented in it's own category, seperated from what we're seeing marketed for the cattle.
 
An odd thing about AI is that it doesn't have a coherent method for matching patterns, as people do. The way it matches patterns results in isolated enclaves of pattern-recognition due to the particularties of data such as amount and translation.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo