Incels.is (Previously known as /r/incels) - Subreddit's banned, entitled Manchildren whine about why they can't get laid.

If you really had to who would you sex?


  • Total de votantes
    4,024
Want to fix shitty parenting? Encourage people not to fuck psychos, therefore no kids born to psycho parents. So, woe and behold, when women do that, incels reeeeing and crying that no one will fuck them and how dare women have rights to say no, because they can't handle the truth, that they're the one who's in the wrong
"encourage women to stop fucking alphas and start fucking betas instead" lmao
this is either a joke or you are delusional
 
Where the hell did I start talking about "alphas" or "betas" lol WTF
cause thats what it boils down to in the end
why else do you think women love to get with sociopaths, criminals, gangsters, abusers, etc? call it dark triad, call it "bad boy", call it alpha, doesn't really matter. the trend is well known and well established, and i don't see how you could stop it.
 
cause thats what it boils down to in the end
why else do you think women love to get with sociopaths, criminals, gangsters, abusers, etc? call it dark triad, call it "bad boy", call it alpha, doesn't really matter. the trend is well known and well established, and i don't see how you could stop it.
I find this little more than blind incel rhetoric because they're too stupid to see the families where there is no "bad boy" or abusive parents where everyone grows up normal.

But hey if you want to whine about women who pick abusive men what about the men who screw crazy women?
 
Where the hell did I start talking about "alphas" or "betas" lol WTF
Something interesting I've always wondered about the "alpha/beta" thing - SJWs constantly trot out the refutation that all the studies that suggested an "alpha male" hierarchy were basically done on stressed out animals in captivity, and the idea is irrelevant in the wild.

For some reason, they inevitably insist that this means that "alpha male" behavior doesn't happen in humans, rather than asking if maybe the people who are talking about alpha/beta male behavior as if they personally witnessed it are maybe stuck in some kind of stressful system that registers instinctively as captivity.
 
I find this little more than blind incel rhetoric because they're too stupid to see the families where there is no "bad boy" or abusive parents where everyone grows up normal.

But hey if you want to whine about women who pick abusive men what about the men who screw crazy women?
hey you're the one who started the whole "stop having kids with psychos" line, now i'm an incel for pointing out that it's unrealistic and not going to happen?

and the reverse situation already doesn't occur in meaningful numbers, purely because the numbers of psychos, criminals, good-for-nothings among women is vanishingly small compared to that number among men.
sure you'll hear lots of "damn man my ex was a complete psycho bitch, i tell you!" ranting from bitter divorcees, but when you look at the actual facts, you'll find that the numbers are extremely one-sided. the number of kids growing up with single mothers because their daddies are in prison is enormous, while the same thing happening to someones mother is an extreme rarity.
 
Something interesting I've always wondered about the "alpha/beta" thing - SJWs constantly trot out the refutation that all the studies that suggested an "alpha male" hierarchy were basically done on stressed out animals in captivity, and the idea is irrelevant in the wild.

For some reason, they inevitably insist that this means that "alpha male" behavior doesn't happen in humans, rather than asking if maybe the people who are talking about alpha/beta male behavior as if they personally witnessed it are maybe stuck in some kind of stressful system that registers instinctively as captivity.
Lolwut mate?
hey you're the one who started the whole "stop having kids with psychos" line, now i'm an incel for pointing out that it's unrealistic and not going to happen?

and the reverse situation already doesn't occur in meaningful numbers, purely because the numbers of psychos, criminals, good-for-nothings among women is vanishingly small compared to that number among men.
sure you'll hear lots of "damn man my ex was a complete psycho bitch, i tell you!" ranting from bitter divorcees, but when you look at the actual facts, you'll find that the numbers are extremely one-sided. the number of kids growing up with single mothers because their daddies are in prison is enormous, while the same thing happening to someones mother is an extreme rarity.
I think you need to step away from the computer, go see the real world, maybe make some normie friends if you really believe that nonsense.
 
I always found it funny how incels always have the line about 'hot girls only fuck Chads' and all i can think of is all those sex cults that periodically get exposed.Like the whole NXIVM thing in which several actressess were part of.If a middle aged obviously creepy weirdo spouting pseudo-intellectual BS can form his own sex cult well then the Chad theory goes out the window.If anything revelations like NXIVM are even worse if you look at it objectively.If the Chad theory was true then at least you could say someone like Keith Raniere could never be a sex offender for 30+ years(!!!) because he was an obvious creep.
 
cause thats what it boils down to in the end
why else do you think women love to get with sociopaths, criminals, gangsters, abusers, etc? call it dark triad, call it "bad boy", call it alpha, doesn't really matter. the trend is well known and well established, and i don't see how you could stop it.
hey you're the one who started the whole "stop having kids with psychos" line, now i'm an incel for pointing out that it's unrealistic and not going to happen?

and the reverse situation already doesn't occur in meaningful numbers, purely because the numbers of psychos, criminals, good-for-nothings among women is vanishingly small compared to that number among men.
sure you'll hear lots of "damn man my ex was a complete psycho bitch, i tell you!" ranting from bitter divorcees, but when you look at the actual facts, you'll find that the numbers are extremely one-sided. the number of kids growing up with single mothers because their daddies are in prison is enormous, while the same thing happening to someones mother is an extreme rarity.
Most manosphere knowledge falls apart completely when you realize they're describing the very impulsive women they want to sleep with. The issue is a lot of society has made it easier for more and more women to be impulsive. And also just empowered young people in general. So many mistakes are made. We'd probably cut down a lot of sexual dysfunction just by fixing colleges. Since that's where 95% of the sex young people are having is.
However you are putting the cart before the horse a little here. Those communities lost men to prison before that dysfunction spread to coupling. As any shitlib could point out to you. The social changes caused crime BEFORE single motherhood. Then welfare benefits were extended to single mothers because that was the fastest solution.
Because fewer men = men have more bargaining power. Which leads to one night stands, pump and dumps, and a more cock carousel environment in reality. These communities lose their men so the men that remain get to play Caligula.
You see this on college campuses too. Where women outnumber men there's more casual sex. Where men outnumber women there are more long term relationships.

But incels and mgtow and all these communities will literally never address this because then they'd realize they have to make society hostile to chad if they want their way. Which btw was how TRADITION worked in practice: white knighting.
Just as marriage was made artificially attractive to men (expectations of docile women) because men are less inclined to get married normally; hook-ups were made difficult.

Sort of like how average women will never realize the fastest way to make the internet more courteous to them is to take down the Belle Delphines of the world. Since Belle Delphine gets all the benefits and they get all the acrimony.
 
Última edición:
Most manosphere knowledge falls apart completely when you realize they're describing the very impulsive women they want to sleep with. The issue is a lot of society has made it easier for more and more women to be impulsive. And also just empowered young people in general. So many mistakes are made. We'd probably cut down a lot of sexual dysfunction just by fixing colleges. Since that's where 95% of the sex young people are having is.
However you are putting the cart before the horse a little here. Those communities lost men to prison before that dysfunction spread to coupling. As any shitlib could point out to you. The social changes caused crime BEFORE single motherhood. Then welfare benefits were extended to single mothers because that was the fastest solution.
Because fewer men = men have more bargaining power. Which leads to one night stands, pump and dumps, and a more cock carousel environment in reality. These communities lose their men so the men that remain get to play Caligula.
You see this on college campuses too. Where women outnumber men there's more casual sex. Where men outnumber women there are more long term relationships.

But incels and mgtow and all these communities will literally never address this because then they'd realize they have to make society hostile to chad if they want their way. Which btw was how TRADITION worked in practice: white knighting.
Just as marriage was made artificially attractive to men (expectations of docile women) because men are less inclined to get married normally; hook-ups were made difficult.

Sort of like how average women will never realize the fastest way to make the internet more courteous to them is to take down the Belle Delphines of the world. Since Belle Delphine gets all the benefits and they get all the acrimony.

This doesn't hold up too much in the real world. Outside of the internet, college and club culture society isn't really that hypersexual or does not have sky high standards for who and what is attractive. There are plenty of fat, plain looking young couples even in small towns especially that had no trouble finding each other. Many of these types are also rather monogamous.

The problem with the incel mindset is their thinking style is so rigid. They think the women on social media that they see are what's actually out there and are angry that they can't have ''that''. Most women out there do not dress, look or act like the one's on social media. These are just hot chicks that like making money off their good looks.
 
Última edición:
This doesn't hold up too much in the real world. Outside of the internet, college and club culture society isn't really that hypersexual or does it have sky high standards for who and what is attractive. There are plenty of fat, plain looking young couples even in small towns especially that had no trouble finding each other. Many of these types are also rather monogamous.

The problem with the incel mindset is their thinking style is so rigid. They think the women on social media that they see are what's actually out there and are angry that they can't have ''that''. Most women out there do not dress, look or act like the one's on social media. These are just hot chicks that like making money off their good looks.
I don't think this is much in disagreement with my points tbh (I even singled out college). Incels are an online phenom so they have online perceptions anyway.
 
incel_alternate_universe.png
 
Oh yeah sure if I was melinda scott...

.. Frankly I don't understand how anyone can see it as easy. Some people are too chickenshit to last long on a dating site, and relationships themselves seem daunting to me. Not a universal thing, some people find dating easy, some don't. And even if you have a relationship, most people earn together or pull their weight out of pride

I don't get how incels can see dating as an easy ticket to life. Maybe if he's so massively intelligent life wouldn't be difficult for him as he's making it out to be.

Or more likely he likes to play make believe on how other people live their lives so he can stroke his ego
 
I guess I can see why they troon out if they have this idealized view of a woman's life. Also I bet they're thinking they would be an attractive woman. Do they realize that even an attractive woman would look ugly if they don't diet/exercise/groom themselves properly? They couldn't hack it even if they tried. Do they realize that men too will hide their flaws behind their dating profiles so selecting a guy(let alone a husband)isn't that easy? The guy your dating could be cool for a few months and suddenly they start getting really controlling and abusive. I mean he won't have to work a day in his life but it'd be because his abusive boyfriend/husband won't let him and it sure as hell won't be an easy. And leaving men like that is the most dangerous part.
 
I remember reading a book called The Simple Art of Not Giving a F*ck by Mark Manson a few years ago that helped shape some of my views and I remember reading an interesting point about why it's pointless getting upset about things you may not be able to control (i.e. genetics or having disorders) because you can't change them. Rather than being angry about things such as having a short stature and instead focusing on things they can change like their attitude, behaviour, physical appearance or lifestyle, I think many incels would probably be a lot less bitter and have a better attitude doing this and maybe they'd get a girlfriend if they're lucky. It may take some work and effort, but it's worth it in the end. Also, I don't believe in the pill philosophy/ideology, whether black, white, red, purple, pink, or blue. Life is all how you interpret it and the choices you make.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo