Imperial Japan Thread - Were they really that bad?

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Japan learned that when you go up against the heavyweight champion of the world, one sucker punch ain't enough. They then turned to more peaceful (for Japan) pursuits, drawing big-tiddied women getting raped by ugly bastards, tentacles, and other big-tiddied women with big dicks
 
I don't know much about corrupt Buddhist traditions in Japan before this period, as I havn't really heard of any
Corrupt Buddhist traditions were a major issue for the Japanese, historically, up till the modern era. Depending on the time period you'd have monks going on literal 2020 tier George Floyd riots burning down cities and had armies to rival the various warlords of the warring states.
 
Corrupt Buddhist traditions were a major issue for the Japanese, historically, up till the modern era. Depending on the time period you'd have monks going on literal 2020 tier George Floyd riots burning down cities and had armies to rival the various warlords of the warring states.
And just like St. Floyd, if you tried fighting back against their guys, they and their financial backers ensured you got written down in historical chronicles as an "evil tyrant who is now burning in the deepest pit of hell."
 
And just like St. Floyd, if you tried fighting back against their guys, they and their financial backers ensured you got written down in historical chronicles as an "evil tyrant who is now burning in the deepest pit of hell."
Exactly what happened to Oda Nobunaga. He went out of his way to break the military might of a certain monastery that kidnapped and killed hostages and burned part of their own monastery to the ground and yet they blamed it on him. Apparently it's recently been discovered via archeology that he went out of his way to try and minimize civilian casualties and saved several buildings the monks burned, but the monks and their allies (as well as Tokugawa, who had a vested interest in making himself look better than Nobunaga) went out of their way to demonize him historically over it.
 
Historical revisionism is claiming that American rule over Okinawa was all evil because the US Military decided to hoard all the water in Okinawa during the 50’s and people suffered crop failures and even going thirsty as a result.

Or the claim the Americans and the British/Australians killed and raped 30% to 40% of the Okinawa.

Seriously it’s too ridiculous. Why the heck would the Americans do that? They’re good lmao.
its not like to this day that American bases in Japan have the highest rates of reported rapes in the areas where they are situated

Imperial Japan had extremely unorganised military in the fact in that the army and the navy absolutely refused to co-operate with each other because they viewed each other as below them so youd get retarded situations where the navy didnt deliver supplies or support where they were meant to or the navy wasn't supported by military bases. Absolutely retarded
 
Imperial Japan had extremely unorganised military in the fact in that the army and the navy absolutely refused to co-operate with each other because they viewed each other as below them so youd get retarded situations where the navy didnt deliver supplies or support where they were meant to or the navy wasn't supported by military bases. Absolutely retarded
You got any sources for this? I'm genuinely curious. This sounds like a source of giant fuck ups. Entertaining, preventable kind that lead to thousands of people dying unfortunately.
 
You got any sources for this? I'm genuinely curious. This sounds like a source of giant fuck ups. Entertaining, preventable kind that lead to thousands of people dying unfortunately.
fuck you got me there I heard it from somewhere else but lemme see if I can find it

Found it
 
You got any sources for this? I'm genuinely curious. This sounds like a source of giant fuck ups. Entertaining, preventable kind that lead to thousands of people dying unfortunately.

It's extremely well documented that the rivalry between the Imperial Japanese Navy and the Imperial Japanese Army is arguably one of the worst cases of crippling interservice rivalry in human history- to the point in the buildup to WW2 Navy and Army officers were assassinating each other's generals and admirals in the streets of Tokyo.

I would go so far as to argue the interservice rivalry more or less was the deciding factor that lead to the Axis Powers losing in WW2. See, the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor and subsequent invasions of the Philippines and Dutch East Indies was the Navy's fuckup of an idea- the Imperial Japanese Army wanted to leave the US alone and instead work more collaboratively with Nazi Germany and invade the Soviet Union from the Russian Fear East at the exact same time Operation Barbarossa started so that the Soviets would be forced to fight a war on two front (which they very well could have lost)- the Army was even willing to *not* invade China in 1937 and form a Non-Aggression pact with Chiang Kai-Shek instead to prepare for this. The Army was even courting "White Emigre" and Fascistic elements of the Russian Diaspora in Manchuria (like the Russian Fascist Party and former White Army officers in exile) so that they could set up puppet governments/collaborators in Occupied Siberia if the plan worked.

I have no doubt in my mind that if Operation Barbarossa and a hypothetical Japanese invasion of the Russian Far East occurred at the exact same time- with the US not getting involved to a good extent because China wouldn't have been invaded in this scenario, it would have resulted in the complete collapse of the Soviet Union. Now Japan is a glorified American Aircraft carrier and a bigger cuck island than Britain that has had a bigger problem with rapes of Japanese Citizens caused by US military stationed there than the Germanys ever had to deal with in regards to the invading soviet mass rapes.
 
It's extremely well documented that the rivalry between the Imperial Japanese Navy and the Imperial Japanese Army is arguably one of the worst cases of crippling interservice rivalry in human history- to the point in the buildup to WW2 Navy and Army officers were assassinating each other's generals and admirals in the streets of Tokyo.
Goddamn.
Now Japan is a glorified American Aircraft carrier and a bigger cuck island than Britain that has had a bigger problem with rapes of Japanese Citizens caused by US military stationed there than the Germanys ever had to deal with in regards to the invading soviet mass rapes.
Gotta love how these things turn out. It's like a tragedy except it's real life.
 
You got any sources for this? I'm genuinely curious. This sounds like a source of giant fuck ups. Entertaining, preventable kind that lead to thousands of people dying unfortunately.
The Imperial Japanese Army ran their own navy (called the "Railway and Shipping Section") with tens of thousands of sailors because the Imperial Japanese Navy was too slow to set up decent convoy operations (since escorting ships was considered unimportant and a task for fuckups in the Navy). They even had their own aircraft carriers like the Akitsu-maru which were akin to the CVEs the US Navy had. Other ships they had like Shinshu-maru are basically ancestors of the amphibious assault ship. They could carry all sorts of smaller landing craft, river boats, and aircraft.

Let's face it--if your army has to run their own navy because your navy's doctrine does not value things like "anti-submarine warfare" despite your entire country being an island, your military has a problem that requires a lot of katanas to solve.
 
The Japanese were vile animals but the Chinese had it coming. They were mass murdering savages to their own people and always have been. They're also a nation of disgusting ingrates. It's a shame we didn't just leave Japan WITH China and kick them out of everyone else. Nothing of value would have been lost.
 
Also, I am sympathetic to the Filipinos, Vietnamese, Thais, people like that, but I do kind of wonder if all this atrocity porn isn't misguided. Don't they all do shit like that? I feel like you can't read anything about any war in Asia without coming across soldiers carving villagers up, whether it's Japanese, Chinese, North Koreans, North Vietnamese.

It strikes me as being like American Indians: senseless being upset about them doing what they do, senseless being upset about the same treatment being meted out to them.
 
go to any museum in Japan they'll barely mention Japanese war crimes and the Hiroshima memorial paints the US as evil cause the Japanese were totally gonna surrender soon or some shit.
That's what is taught in Western universities, too. "Japan was nuked because of RACISM!!! They were trying to surrender!!!" Total fucking bullshit.
 
Japan learned that when you go up against the heavyweight champion of the world, one sucker punch ain't enough. They then turned to more peaceful (for Japan) pursuits, drawing big-tiddied women getting raped by ugly bastards, tentacles, and other big-tiddied women with big dicks

According to some, Japan got their perfect revenge through the tranime pipeline. Ignoring the entire pharma/medical/university influence of course.
 
Sounds like they actually had a good plan rather than attacking a random superpower an ocean away
It wasn't though because Japan was dependent on US scrap iron, finished steel, and distilled oil, and the US stopped selling those to Japan because of its invasions of mainland Asia, not because of December 7

Japan had the industrial capacity to build a big army and navy, or build the infrastructure to get iron and coal from Manchuria and oil from Indonesia to build and fuel its army and navy. Not both. They chose to build the army and navy and then hoped that they could buy enough time for the resources they grabbed to become exploitable (this would take years and Japan never really managed it). Shipbuilding for the Imperial Navy peaked at 180,000 tons in 1941 and averaged 137,000 tons/year for the next four years. Shipbuilding for the US Navy was 130,000 tons in 1941 and averaged 800,000 tons/year for the next four years. That's just warships, not all the freighters and stuff the US also built. Japan fell far behind because of the denial of materials from the US
 
Atrás
Top Abajo