🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Look I'm no Tookie Williams but I can guarantee you his version of how gangs work is bullshit. Territory is a part but attacking folks solely for being there? Naw dogg, that isn't how shit works. Gang culture is way more intricate than Sweet's blaxploitation view of it.
 
Última edición:
. It's some strange perfect storm of geography (the school is 15 miles away from the per capita v.d. capital of the U.S.), a loose moral fiber, and the relaxed political atmosphere of 1996-97. We'll have another Clinton in the Presidential race next year, and the window is rapidly closing. I have to move quickly or lose my golden opportunity.

OK, so I'm assuming that he believes that if Hillary wins the election, this will somehow slam the door on ASU and it will remain forever locked. Ignoring the fact that he will never be able to go back to ASU under any circumstances, whether the president is a Democrat, Republican, Communist, Nazi, or Reptiloid Illuminati from Ganymede, why is it that another Clinton president is THE THING that will cost him this opportunity?

Wasn't a Clinton president during this very same golden age he waxes poetically about? Wouldn't he want another Clinton president, since that would, in some small way, be closer to recreating conditions during half-past 1997?


I suspect he's merely parroting Rush Limbaugh; I recall several years ago I accidentally tuned into his show and he was just semi-coherently ranting about how much he hates Hillary Clinton and he started bellowing in a quasi-panicked tone "THEY WANT TO PUT ANOTHER CLINTON IN THE WHITE HOUSE! THEY WANT TO PUT ANOTHER CLINTON IN THE WHITE HOUSE!". So, Sweet, being literally incapable of doing independent research, absorbing new information, and reaching his own conclusions, has been echoing Rush ever since.
 
In the past, I've said that Jon is dishonest. Well, I'll have to amend that, now. Jon Sweet doesn't merely obscure or duck around the truth.

Jon Sweet is a liar, and "The System" is the biggest horse apple he's picked up and gleefully chewed on.

I used to think that his idiotic "That's how they taught us ... in The System" was nothing more than the typical, catchphrase-styled nonsense you'd usually hear coming out of an autistic bumblebrain who didn't understand how to communicate with adults of functional intelligence, but then I realized today that it is that phrase in particular that puts the lie to Jon's statements about ASU, and his life since.

Key words of the catchphrase (#3 before the seemingly retired "Hmm?") that shows his mendacious behavior are "we," "taught," and, of course, "The System." The concepts represented in these four words alone betray Jon for the liar that he is, as they illustrate perfectly that he is talking about a conspiracy that not only is unprovable, but one he knows to be false.

Let's start with "we." This is one of the first, most damning elements of Jon's statements about "The System," has he has yet to show any evidence at all that this alleged conspiracy affected anyone else but him. He cannot bring forward any other male that had a girlfriend assigned to him, nor any female who had been assigned to a male. He cannot provide any conversations he's had with other guys in the dorms who had even seen "Ashleigh," let alone had any experiences on the chinaphone. He has not maintained contact with a single one of his former coworkers at The Herald, who could've admitted or denied participation in the conspiracy. There are absolutely no witnesses to this massive, campus-wide monstrosity that controlled Jon's life, so when he talks about it, he's only talking about himself alone. Implying that anyone else was affected by "The System" is a lie.

Then we move on to "taught." "Taught" is, of course, the past tense of "teach," which, according to Oxford Dictionary, means "Impart knowledge to or instruct (someone) as to how to do something." The use of this word in referring to his revelations of life at ASU is a lie. In order to be taught, someone would've had to sat Jon down and instructed him on how things worked. Certainly, while one can learn through experience, according to Jon, that didn't happen. He has painted a picture, multiple times, of a plucky college kid, blissfully unaware that anything bad was going on. Jon didn't start talking about "The System" until after he'd been kicked out of college, to my understanding. This means that he wasn't "taught" anything at all; rather, Jon had inferred the existence of "The System" after the fact. In other words, he just made it up in reaction to his only sense of agency (mistaken as it may have been) having been revoked.

Finally, we come to "The System" itself. This is the ultimate lie, the big one. You may be wondering how it is that any of this is a 'lie' to begin with, as opposed to the result of poor reasoning skills. I say that Jon is lying because there have been far too many times where he has admitted to his actions, and even implied that his behavior was bad. Whether this was a result of his memory being too poor for him to maintain his defense, or if he was being genuinely honest (shyah, right!), Jon realizes that his behavior was unacceptable. No fictional "System" would be necessary for him to get the boot; the rules and bylaws of the university would be enough. Jon, however, being a pile of skin-sheathed gelatin and insecurity, could not tolerate the fact that, once again, someone had easily kicked his ass. After all, this wasn't like when Jon normally got his face rearranged - this one had consequences. All of those wonderful perks were ripped away from him, and he had to return to the sad nightmare that was his life.

Thus, "The System" was born. It was a means of Jon coming up with a villain in order to make himself look better, true, but it also gave him a peak to try and climb to. If ASU simply kicked him out, then it was done and he was out, that's that. But if there was some terrible evil for him to battle, then he was done wrong and could overcome that evil, escaping the Sweet household and getting back to those life-affirming perks that a bottom-feeder like himself would crave so much.

The problem is that Jon isn't smart. He isn't creative or rational, either. So, when he talks about "The System", he does so in very vague terms. When describing it, he's never given us any real specifics about how it works, who's running it, or why. When put to the test, it simply falls apart. Not only are there no other witnesses or victims, as mentioned above, but now that he has admitted that "Ashleigh" was a troll, he has essentially torpedoed the whole "System-provided girl" lunacy. When he asks why no one told him about what was truly going on, the simplest explanation is the most likely: The perpetually friendless man who nobody likes and actively beats up, ignores, or makes fun of to this very day, wasn't very likable back when he was a college student. Nobody talked to him because nobody wanted anything to do with him other than to poke fun.

"The System," as Jon has described it, is ambiguous, amorphous, and completely without any logical roots in reality. It is nothing more than a falsehood Jon uses to cover up his terrible behavior in the past, and to explain his social and intellectual uselessness to this day, saying that he was "taught" how to be a feckless cretin in college, as if grown adults can't get past what they learn in university.

So, there you have it. Jon is a liar, and "The System" is one of the biggest fibs of all.

In closing, let me just state that, one day, Jon Sweet's welfare is going to be cancelled. He'll have to eat the corpses of his pets just to keep from starving.

So what you're saying is he made all that shit up about "the system" and expects people to believe it?

That somehow makes him even more retarded than if he actually believed it himself (if such a thing were even possible.)
 
Has Sweet ever described Ashleigh? You'd think someone he was obsessed with after meeting her once would at least get a description and possibly a portrayal in the comics.
He posted yearbook photos and doxx of a young woman who did live in a neighboring town.

Of course, that woman's name isn't Ashleigh, she isn't Catholic, her father has never been a lawyer, and she did not grow up in a "wealthy" or "upper class" neighborhood. So I don't know if Sweet's been doxxing the wrong person entirely for years now.
 
God he is so fucking stupid. I bet I could easily convince him to delete system 32.
 
I agree with the teen boy troll interpretation.

But if he did meet Ashleigh, what if it was a sorority hazing/prank? You know, like a pig party?
Nothing Sweet has said has given me any confidence a meeting ever happened regardless of the gender and intention of the supposed caller. This honestly is me playing devil's advocate because I am acting like the call ever happened.

He Sets Me On Fire pointed out how Sweet will at times admit wrong but will usually double back or try and cover it up. It was a troll!... but female, totally true and honest female!

He knows 'Ashleigh' was a troll, he can't admit the rest. Sweet, how am I wrong? A more detailed story please?
 
Última edición:
Sweet probably thinks that President Obama, Hilary Clinton, Doctor M here on the forums, and the people who kicked him out of ASU are all not only progressives, but that they also all have the exact same opinions and beliefs.

Hillary was asking me just the other day why it was taking me so long to get Sweet kicked off of welfare and ordered to repay all of the benefits he has fraudulentltly received. Then she laughed, and in her best hillbilly accent said, "Dem's not fo hims. Dem's fo we-uns."
 
Wasn't a Clinton president during this very same golden age he waxes poetically about? Wouldn't he want another Clinton president, since that would, in some small way, be closer to recreating conditions during half-past 1997?.

Yeah, I suspect he thinks the Clinton name is a massive panty-dropper for all the young women at ASU.

Hillary will get them all dripping like a busted fridge, then he can just swoop in and mop up.
 
It never occurs to Sweet that our story "keeps changing" because we're all different people who have different theories about the truth behind his stories. Of course, this makes sense, since Sweet's autism makes it impossible for him to understand that we're not in fact some kind of illithid hive-mind.

Sweet, here's a little bit of information for you: we have different ideas and stories because they're funny. We suggest them because we are laughing at you. We are laughing at you because you are a joke. You, Jonathan Sweet, are a walking, er... living, uh, no... um... arguably sentient(?) punchline.

That's another reason I can totally believe he has the 'tism. There's a few things at work here:

1. His story, including everything about the System, the conspiracy at the Herald, Ashleigh leaving him because of his dead dad, etc. seems entirely self-evident to him, and he lacks the ability to understand other people don't have the same thoughts and experiences and interperetations as he does. In his mind, the only possible reason we could say he is wrong, in the face of what to him is overwhelming evidence, is if we are in fact evil.

2. He lacks the ability to realize that all of us don't share one hivemind either, so we can disagree on things like whether he plagiarized SNL (he totally did) or who Ashleigh actually was. In his mind, we are all one faceless mass, so when one person says he's a plagiarist and another says he isn't, he sees it as contradiction ("changing our story") instead of disagreement.

3. He doesn't understand sarcasm or hyperbole. When one person comes in and says "lol I bet sweets takes it up the ass from niggoes" he doesn't realize that's a joke and none of us actually believes that - he thinks we, the Kiwi hivemind, have "changed our story" again.

And he's never going to change his mind on any of it. Accepting he was wrong about one thing opens the door to admitting he was wrong about other things, which inevitably leads to the conclusion that he's wasted the best years of his life tilting at windmills, and his Dulcinea never even existed.
 
3. He doesn't understand sarcasm or hyperbole. When one person comes in and says "lol I bet sweets takes it up the ass from niggoes" he doesn't realize that's a joke and none of us actually believes that - he thinks we, the Kiwi hivemind, have "changed our story" again.

It's a joke because he actually does do that, though.
 
If Sweets is planning to use Clinton power to dip his wick in college students 20 years his junior, is he also planning on concealing his own political affiliation until he's done the deed?

Is his pillow talk gonna be "Baby, I hate to break it to your freshly ripened little progressive butt, but the man who just took you to heaven and back on four inches of Missouri meatstick is really an old rock-ribbed paleo-Limbaugh dittohead silverback who don't believe in welfare for nobody except former bad boys of college journalism who got rused into lifelong unemployment by the evil liberal college system conspiracy"?

Glad I don't have to be a fly on the wall for that.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo