🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Yeah, I see that being the case. He probably sees Japanese women as essentially sex slaves and Jon is all about his women being submissive. That's the only way he's gonna get his china without his prize escaping.

Also can't forget Jon thought "Tin Boo Tee" was an authentic Japanese name. If he did some research for once in his life, he would realize there is a vast obvious different between Japanese names and Chinese/Korean names. Not to say Chinese and Korean names are exactly the same, but their languages are very similar if I'm correct. Japanese is very distinct from Chinese and Korean.

Not to mention the fact that Tin Boo Tee was based on an actual Japanese woman from the Japanese nation of Japan that Jon actually knew. She even signed his yearbook. Mayhaps he could've, I dunno ....
 
It really is funny how weak Sweet's grasp on English is. Especially how he constantly misuse phrases all the time. So much for getting his money's worth out of college. Gets an English degree and the guy not even that good of a writer. Guess he wouldn't be having trouble if he had that geek at ASU to edit his material.

There is never any shortage of people who decide to major in English because they think it's got to be easy... after all, they already speak it. Or those who resent taking the required first-year essay-writing class because they're going to be business majors, and certainly there can't be any writing involved in that, right? Sweets has always struck me as a curious mix of the two. The only really horrifying thing about his formulaic horror stories is that you realize he's likely typing with one hand as he inflicts these punishments on people who offended him, or played the role of Ashleigh, or were family members of whoever played the role of Ashleigh, or people who drove through a puddle and splashed him when he was out collecting cans...
 
I think Sweet sees the outside world kind of like an old RPG like Final Fantasy, in that off-campus (like on running tracks or even outside the Sweet home), dogs and thugs can just suddenly appear out of nowhere and attack!

But ASU is apparently like a village with no random "enemy encounters."
 
Última edición:
I think Sweet sees the outside world kind of like an old RPG like Final Fantasy, in that off-campus (like on running tracks or even outside the Sweet home), dogs and thugs can just suddenly appear out of nowhere and attack!

But ASU is apparently like a village with no random "enemy encounters."
Jon's Adult Chronicles?
I just noticed that Jon never talks about vidya in any of his screeds- my guess is that, growing up poor, he never had access to video games and thus didn't become retardedly obsessed with them like so many lolcows do. It's sort of refreshing to see an autist who's not constantly sperging about Sanic or Pokemans or Cawadoody.

Jon on his Dec. 9 journal entry, when asked what he has to offer ASU, women or a potential employer:
Delusional twit dijo:
I offer a new age of freedom and prosperity through giving the people of ASU exactly what they had before, what they wanted before the poison of change settled in and twisted their minds. I have not fundamentally changed in over 15 years. Why should I? I offer exactly what I did back then in to any perspective girlfriend or employer. I was doing great for myself, I lived it up, and if it was good enough in 1997, thee's no reason it isn't good enough now.
There are many, many reasons why Jon wasn't "good enough in 1997" and "isn't good enough now," but those have all been rehashed here ad infinitum so there's no point in bringing them up again. But Jon, what do you think people at ASU were doing before 1997? Do you think that maybe, over the course of the century during which ASU has existed, it may have gone through a few different modes of functioning that shifted over time to reflect changing social trends? Why should things just be rolled back to 1997 - why not 1965, when ASU wasn't a university but a college? Or 1925, when it was an agricultural/mechanical training college without any of those namby-pamby liberal arts courses? Or 1909, when it was brand-new and hadn't been subjected to any changes at all? Maybe what people really want is to learn about farming without the distraction of high-speed internet, cable TV, sumptuous buffets, or women. Why aren't you willing to roll things back that far, Jon? Why does it have to be the time period you remember most fondly?

Why - you're not doing this for selfish reasons, are you, Jon? It can't be true! Tell me it's not true!

Keep in mind that Jon is offering his amazing unchanged self to women in their late teens and early 20s. Jon, I am only a few years your junior and I find you repulsive. College-age Shadow Fox would have been horrified by a flabby, balding, unwashed 40-something in pedo glasses hovering around her trying to get some of that insecure-girl china and beat a hasty retreat to summon campus security. College girls didn't want you back then, and they don't want you now - just like you, that fact has studiously resisted the poison of change. Aren't you glad to hear that?
 
Going back to what I said earlier, about Jon not understanding that other people have different information than he does... what doesn't make sense to me is why he tells these outrageous lies and thinks we will buy them. Most recently, he's trying to get us to believe the sumptuous buffets in his dorm included steak and quail - something so obviously untrue it boggles the mind that he'd even state it. Then there's the way his story has changed on his mom being attacked, him attacking his brother, Dale and the store, etc. Is he so far gone that he actually believes his own lies? Does he believe that since, from his perspective, we're making up stuff, we'll buy anything he says? I just don't get it.
 
I'd bet that like Chris sweets has extreme difficulty in recognizing faces/bodies including his own. This would explain why he thinks his obese balding forty year old self looks just like a university student.
 
Jon, keep obsessing about a 1997 that never happened. Also, college kids today love their gadgets, and high-speed internet, and the relaxing of restrictive social mores, and I doubt very much they'd want to go back to a time that they don't even remember. You are the only one who wants to go back to then. You are not special. You don't get to dictate what other people do. Everything that happened to you you brought on yourself, no one forced you to steal an idea for an article, no one forced you to make threats, no one made you act like such an ass that you are unemployable. You did that yourself.

I'm going to powerlevel here, but I'm a mere four months older than Sweet, so I was in college at the same time he was, and while I was not a big man on campus, I can safely say that everything Sweet thinks about college at that time is wrong. I like nostalgia as much as the next person, and I often fire up various console emulators and play the games that I played back then. I watch TV and movies from that time too, sometimes. But I also play modern games, and watch current TV and movies. I have no desire to go back to 1997 because we've got better stuff now, and the social clime is better now.

I can tell you one thing though, I'm in college now for a better degree than the two I've already got, and I can safely say that the traditional college age students and the older students only really interact in classes, and don't mix socially. I wouldn't even know what to say to an 18-21 year old woman. We're from completely different worlds. I'm sure other Kiwis who are in, or have been to college can back me up here.
 
Going back to what I said earlier, about Jon not understanding that other people have different information than he does... what doesn't make sense to me is why he tells these outrageous lies and thinks we will buy them. Most recently, he's trying to get us to believe the sumptuous buffets in his dorm included steak and quail - something so obviously untrue it boggles the mind that he'd even state it. Then there's the way his story has changed on his mom being attacked, him attacking his brother, Dale and the store, etc. Is he so far gone that he actually believes his own lies? Does he believe that since, from his perspective, we're making up stuff, we'll buy anything he says? I just don't get it.
Perhaps @ASU can fill us in on what they served.
 
Can somebody photoshop Jon's head on this picture? I know our autistic manchild can't drive, but if he could, this would be his ride.
jonsvan.png

Jon, you would be getting all the 8 year old girls.
 
So basically what we all learned here is Jonny never met his troll fake girlfriend, who was a teenage boy searching for the stupid fucker from ASU to prank based on big bro's stories about him, and he cybered with said teenager. So in short, Jonny he of 47 chromosomes... is a gay pedophile who will run with what I just said because he is easily butthurt.
 
I think Ashleigh was in fact a woman, and did meet Sweet. She called looking for his roommate, and Sweet answered the phone, and obviously said SOMETHING that convinced her that he was worth fucking with. I just can't believe that even Sweet would be obsessed with someone that he never met for almost 20 years. I'm an adherent to Occam's Razor, and the simplest explanation is that Sweet got trolled by some townie girl who realized she had an sperg on her hands and decided to have some fun at Sweet's expense.
 
I think Ashleigh was in fact a woman, and did meet Sweet. She called looking for his roommate, and Sweet answered the phone, and obviously said SOMETHING that convinced her that he was worth fucking with. I just can't believe that even Sweet would be obsessed with someone that he never met for almost 20 years. I'm an adherent to Occam's Razor, and the simplest explanation is that Sweet got trolled by some townie girl who realized she had an sperg on her hands and decided to have some fun at Sweet's expense.
Either version works, since either way he got trolled. Now let's watch Thumbface take this newest disagreement and accuse us of changing the story.
 
Última edición:
P.s when he says '8 inch bone knife' does he mean a knife made of bone or is he rembering 'boning knife' wrong, because Sweet is an idiot and I doubt he'd know the difference or why neither is particularly intimidating.

Determining what Sweet means when he mentions specific details in his rants is an exercise in futility. While Sweet has threatened us with an eight-inch "bone knife" -- a knife with a blade made of bone -- the image he linked was a six-inch "boning knife," an implement with a thin, flexible metal blade typically used for filleting fish. Neither would be a smart choice in a knife fight, especially since his opponents will be armed with guns.
 
Determining what Sweet means when he mentions specific details in his rants is an exercise in futility. While Sweet has threatened us with an eight-inch "bone knife" -- a knife with a blade made of bone -- the image he linked was a six-inch "boning knife," an implement with a thin, flexible metal blade typically used for filleting fish. Neither would be a smart choice in a knife fight, especially since his opponents will be armed with guns.
Correct. Should Sweet find his way to my locale, he will find I am well-equipped to repel a knife-wielding intruder. He would have difficulty finding me however, given his utter ineptitude at tracking down "Ashleigh".
 
Última edición:
Delusional Twit wrote:

I offer exactly what I did back then in [sic] to any perspective girlfriend or employer.

Yep. You offered nothing then. You offer nothing now.

And, once again, there's that hillbilly use of "perspective" instead of "prospective."
 
Correct. Should Sweet find his way to my locale, he will find I am well-equipped to repel a knife-wielding intruder. He would have difficulty finding me however, given his utter ineptitude at tracking down "Ashleigh".
Hey, now, nobody TOLD him how to use a phone book! (Seriously, the woman he claims is "Ashleigh" is listed in the goddamned phone book.)
 
Sweet hasn't really been trolled by *chan anons yet (that I know of), but if he were and he threatened to go after them with bone knives or something, it'd be even more interesting than him threatening to go after not-so-anonymous people -- which he still can't seem to track down.

At least he may get sumptuous pizza dining out of it though.
(which he'd probably interpret as anons showering him with gifts)
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo