🐱 How Segregation And Discrimination Racialized The Obesity Epidemic

CatParty

America’s costly obesity epidemic disproportionately afflicts black and Latino populations, according to a new report from Duke University.

The report from the Samuel DuBois Cook Center on Social Equity at Duke says residential segregation and a lack of upward social mobility helped create racial disparities in obesity rates, and it provides recommendations for change.

The report illuminates how “protective factors” that can help prevent obesity in the general population often do not insulate blacks. The key difference is neighborhoods: Predominantly African-American neighborhoods often lack key health-promoting resources such as parks and access to fresh foods. Those stark neighborhood differences, in turn, result from discriminatory housing policies.

“The impact of discrimination is pervasive and occurs in all arenas of everyday life. Discrimination’s adverse effect on maintenance of healthy weight and well-being is virtually as pernicious as its effects on employment and income,” said William A. Darity Jr., co-author of the report, Samuel DuBois Cook Professor of Public Policy, African and African American Studies and economics at Duke, and director of the Cook Center.

In America, nearly 40 percent of adults are obese, resulting in health care costs of some $190 billion each year to manage preventable diseases. Black and Latino adults in the U.S. have disproportionately higher rates of obesity -- 46.8 percent and 47.0 percent, respectively, versus 37.9 percent for white adults, according to National Center for Health Statistics. These high-weight individuals experience not only higher medical bills but also discriminatory hiring practices that result in lower job attainment and incomes, the report says.

Furthermore, protective factors that can reduce individuals’ risks of negative health outcomes have varying effects across race, class and gender, says the report, “Inequity in Place: Obesity Disparities and the Legacy of Racial Residential Segregation and Social Immobility.”

For example, income serves as a protective factor against obesity in children, but higher income is less protective for black children than it is for white children.

“For whites, increased income and educational attainment tend to yield increased access to resources that promote healthy weight maintenance. But for blacks of similar status, racism-driven mechanisms often prevent them from accessing those same resources,” said Imari Z. Smith, lead author and an associate in research at the Cook Center.

Residential segregation is one such mechanism. Through years of racially discriminatory rental and sale practices, predominantly black neighborhoods have been systematically demarcated and devalued. Predominantly black neighborhoods disproportionately feature lower access to fresh food (in neighborhoods known as food deserts), higher access to fast food and other unhealthy options (food swamps), and reduced access to opportunities for physical activity.

As a result, health-promoting resources are inequitably available to blacks and whites. The authors note that neighborhood characteristics -- not genetic or cultural factors -- are the key drivers of differing obesity rates between blacks and whites. Once factors like age, income and education are considered, black and white women living in the same neighborhoods face similar odds of obesity.

The report features 10 sweeping policy suggestions to reduce the racial obesity disparity, including increasing investment in safe and high-quality neighborhood parks and recreation centers; reducing the existing weight-loss requirement for obesity treatment covered by Medicare and Medicaid; implementing federal programs to provide future generations with the wealth that remove economic barriers to weight management; and updating zoning laws to reduce the prevalence of food deserts and food swamps.

The authors also call for more policies that accommodate and respect people of all sizes, which could have magnified effects for people doubly burdened by obesity and racial discrimination.

“Research shows that discrimination negatively affects individual health, with weight discrimination being associated with the decreased ability to fight inflammation, metabolize foods and regulate blood sugar,” said Smith. “Given the racial disparity in obesity outcomes and chronic stress measures, added racial discrimination experienced by blacks has the potential to further amplify the physiological impacts of weight discrimination.”

Click here to download a PDF of the full research report.
 
There's some truth to all this noise.
When food corporations decided to replace sugar with High Fructose Corn Syrup they did so because the government subsidizes corn, HFCS is hella cheaper than sugar. All those $1 arizona iced teas the poors seem to love (as well as just about every other low grade food) is dripping in the shit. If you drink just ONE can of soda a day (sweetened with HFCS of course) you up your risk for type 2 diabeetus considerably and you're pretty much doomed to get fatter over time.

TLDR - It's not a race issue, it's a class and education issue.
As usual.
 
There's some truth to all this noise.
When food corporations decided to replace sugar with High Fructose Corn Syrup they did so because the government subsidizes corn, HFCS is hella cheaper than sugar. All those $1 arizona iced teas the poors seem to love (as well as just about every other low grade food) is dripping in the shit. If you drink just ONE can of soda a day (sweetened with HFCS of course) you up your risk for type 2 diabeetus considerably and you're pretty much doomed to get fatter over time.

TLDR - It's not a race issue, it's a class and education issue.
As usual.
Fucking lol. I drink 4 sodas a day and maintain the same weight and lack of diabetes.

HFCS is shitty and fuck the corn lobby and all, but lets not be stupid about it. No, one soda a day will not doom you to diabetus or getting fat.
 
Fucking lol. I drink 4 sodas a day and maintain the same weight and lack of diabetes.

HFCS is shitty and fuck the corn lobby and all, but lets not be stupid about it. No, one soda a day will not doom you to diabetus or getting fat.
Them some good genes you got thar, boy
see you at 40
 
so we built a park in the ghetto but then it was used by junkies and drug dealers so we set up a beat patrol there but cops are racist so we had to get rid of them and then somehow all these junkies and drug dealers just appeared...
A large capital city not far from me has installed parks in low-income areas, but they get destroyed within a few months.

One park in particular had the playground equipment doused with lighter fluid and set on fire, another park had its own personal pooper that smeared feces all over the equipment, another park had razor blades superglued on the monkey bars.

The the "leaders" of those areas complain that the city doesn't do anything to fix up those areas.
 
The scholars at MPC call this the spic-nig cycle.

140112.png
 
Fucking lol. I drink 4 sodas a day and maintain the same weight and lack of diabetes.

HFCS is shitty and fuck the corn lobby and all, but lets not be stupid about it. No, one soda a day will not doom you to diabetus or getting fat.
If I drank 4 sodas a day id be probably driving a scooter for day to day mobility. I think 1 can of cola per day is about 5 pounds a month so it's definitely a factor in weight gains.

Some people with skinny gene (it's real) can sustain more than average people but let's not kid ourselves. Most people do not have skinny gene.

Sugar tax is one of few things I support wholeheartly. And it has to be done statewide or otherwise it's ineffective. I think that we fucked ourselves with abundance of glucose from grains which we subsidize.
 
Do food deserts even exist? Even the shittiest and most ghetto gas stations I've visited had cans of beans and apples/bananas.
Selection is usually pretty shit. You can keep yourself alive without putting on pounds from some of the stuff found in convenient stores, but two things to that:

1. Convenient stores have large markups, so you pay more...For the convenience of not having to go to a further-away location.

2. Generally only a few items there will probably not make you fat long-term, almost everything else you're likely to find there is probably covered in salt and sugar. Personally I have also never seen fresh fruit at a gas station. (Dare to dream...) Dollar stores tend to be a little bit better but not by much. If you intend to eat healthy, get used to eating mostly chicken/eggs and ignoring 90% of whats on offer, and of course merely tolerating the sub-standard canned goods. (They might have some frozen if you're lucky)

Comparatively, buying a month's supply of groceries from a proper grocer is not only cheaper, but better quality on average, and allows for far more variety. Its just overall a far better place to be that (In my experience) lends itself less to making bad choices by sheer virtue of there being more good ones to make.

I think "Food desert" in retrospect is probably over sensational a term, but there is some merit to it. The focus should be less on "Food" and more on "Nutrition" because its not that there is no food, its that the food is mostly garbage.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo