How Much Legal Trouble Is AOC In? - Big Booty Bribes.

How Much Legal Trouble Is AOC In?

Story by John Rossomando

House Ethics Panel Says AOC May Have Broken the Law - The circumstances surrounding Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (or AOC) attendance - and, more importantly, her wardrobe choices and cost - at the exclusive 2021 Met Gala last year may have broken federal law and House rules, the bipartisan Board of the Office of Congressional Ethics decided in a 5-0 vote several months back. To this day, the mater is not resolved.

“…he Board finds that there is substantial reason to believe that Rep. Ocasio-Cortez accepted impermissible gifts associated with her attendance at the Met Gala,” the Board of the Office of Congressional Ethics found in its ruling, released Thursday. “Accordingly, the Board recommends that the Committee further review the above allegation that Rep. Ocasio-Cortez accepted impermissible gifts associated with her attendance at the Met Gala.”

What Did AOC Do?​

The rental of her “Tax the Rich” dress cost $1,200. The matching shoes cost $635. The handbag rental cost $170 for a total of $2,283, including sales tax. A Sept. 9, 2021, bill was provided by a publicist for Brother Vellies, which provided Ocasio-Cortez’ outfit for the Met Gala, to one of the congresswoman’s campaign staffers.

A revised bill dated Sept. 20 reduced the gown rental to $300 and the overall rental to $990. The committee interviewed the campaign staffer about the discrepancy between the first bill and the second bill, and was unable to explain the change. Brother Vellies declined to cooperate with the committee.


AOC was supposed to have paid the invoice for the rental but only did so after the committee began its investigation. The rental company and the woman who did the congresswoman’s hair identified $5,799.99 worth of unpaid bills related to Ocasio-Cortez’s gown rental, transportation, room rental, and shoes and boetie rented by Ocasio-Cortez’s boyfriend.

Conde Nast Transportation paid the outstanding $5,799 on May 10, 2022.

The report stated that “Rep. Ocasio-Cortez may not have paid for several thousands of dollars’ worth of goods and services provided to her” had it not been for the committee investigation.


House rules prohibit members of Congress from accepting any “gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value.” This includes “gifts of services, training, transportation, lodging, and meals, whether provided in kind, by purchase of a ticket, payment in advance, or reimbursement after the expense has been incurred.”

AOC Strikes Back​

The congresswoman disputes that her delayed payment equaled the services being impermissible gifts. Ocasio-Cortez’s office rebutted the report in a statement to NBC News:

“Though no Ethics violation has been found, the Office of Congressional Ethics ('OCE') did identify that there were delays in paying vendors for costs associated with the Congresswoman’s attendance at the Met Gala. The Congresswoman finds these delays unacceptable, and she has taken several steps to ensure nothing of this nature will happen again,” it said.

"However, while regrettable, these delayed payments definitively do not rise to the level of a violation of House Rules. Even after OCE’s exhaustive review of the Congresswoman’s personal communications, there is no record of the Congresswoman refusing to pay for these expenses. To the contrary, there are several explicit, documented communications, from prior to OCE’s review, that show the Congresswoman understood that she had to pay for these expenses from her own personal funds — as she ultimately did.”

The full House Ethics Committee will take up the case; however, Ocasio-Cortez likely will escape with a slap on the wrist.

John Rossomando’s work has been featured in numerous publications such as The American Thinker, Daily Wire, Red Alert Politics, CNSNews.com, The Daily Caller, Human Events, Newsmax, The American Spectator, TownHall.com, and Crisis Magazine. He also served as senior managing editor of The Bulletin, a 100,000-circulation daily newspaper in Philadelphia, and received the Pennsylvania Associated Press Managing Editors first-place award in 2008 for his reporting.

[ Article | Archive ]
 
I'll never forget the picture of this ugly spic bitch beaming in her socjus dress in the middle of covid while all the workers behind her stood in black masks and every fucking liberal ate it up.
It's mind boggling how many smooth brains on both sides of the aisle fall for these sociopathic monsters. How many fucking times did a politician get busted partying with a bunch of people not wearing masks while Americans were forced not to work?
 
I think there's a chance she'll be removed. The Party's old guard see her as an outsider who rose too high above her station.
I don't think so. The party establishment is bothering with this because they think they can keep her in line. If they really wanted her out they'd just primary her or pull some sort of redistricting shenanigans or something. Elections are every 2 years after all.
 
I don't think so. The party establishment is bothering with this because they think they can keep her in line. If they really wanted her out they'd just primary her or pull some sort of redistricting shenanigans or something. Elections are every 2 years after all.
The problem with that is she's probably the most recognizable name in Congress. Ousting her during the primaries is a lot easier said than done. Plus if they redistrict her out of office, it'd be too much of a slap in the face for her voters. Popping her on an ethics complaint would not only get rid of her, they'd get to say "See, nobody's above the law."
 
I imagine nothing will happen because she's part of the in crowd. She is a Democrat. But I doubt anything would happen to certain Republicans either. Mean while Trump gets indicted for trumped up (no pun intended) BS charges. Having boxes of declassified documents he declassified and secured in his private home in Mar-a-Lago under lock and key with layers of security. A server in a bathroom with classified information stored on it? No big deal. I am sure those framed Time magazine covers and Melania's clothes were all very important. Especially her panties. I can imagine a bunch of creepy FBI Boomers sniffing them and rubbing them all over their faces. Probably jerking off with them.

Mean while you have Hunter Biden's laptop full of evidence and boxes of classified documents Biden took him with home dating back to when he was a Senator in the fucking 70's.

I don't really pay attention to these kind of stories much anymore because nothing ever happens.
 
Of course she doesn't. But someone made her a custom dress anyway without billing or reporting the actual value of that gift. (Unless you think the original figure of $1300 covered the entire cost, which I don't)
At least if someone's renting a Chanel dress, the owner can keep renting it out and make money on it. Nobody is renting AOC's custom dress - it's a RINO (Rental In Name Only).

But yes, I'm sure this sort of arrangement is common in red-carpet circles.
$1300 covers it... if you add a zero and then multiple it by some number between 2 and 5

I don't know anything about the specific laws. My post was to bring up the fact that the main incentive to create the dress is to have someone wear it at the Met Gala, then likely wait to sell it to some collection/museum.
I do think there is another element which is: AOC wearing that dress at the Met got more attention than it would have if "random actress" did it; but I am not sure that supports the argument that it was a gift. In a sense, it's AOC that is giving a "gift" of value by wearing the dress (what are the rules for elected representatives seemingly endorsing private companies?)

My opinion of AOC is not the most popular on this site (especially this part of the site), but her appearance at the Gala was the dumbest shit of all time. I'm torn between "other congressmen/senators get away with a lot more (e.g. insider trading)" and "you got to start somewhere". In other words, I don't care what happens to her

Her dress was also ugly af (it seems a repurposed cheap wedding gown), and probably the second worst dress that night after whatever the fuck this is:

pegthepatriarchy.PNG
 
...while all the workers behind her stood in black masks...
Don't forget the trappings of the job itself twists and hollows out people beyond recognition. She used to be in the same kind of work as those people in the same city as that event and a few terms of service later she forgets how to pay her own bills.

This was a publicity agreement reached between her and the designer, who AOC confirms she returned the dress to, ultimately amounting to a collaborative photo op. The petty stuff about late payments and changing invoices is routine finger-fuckery that won't even be worth the cost of investigating, and she had the sense to not cast it as political persecution.

Add to that, Congress has a 98% re-election rate, she's perceived as conventionally attractive and a decent speaker (statistically a huge boon), New York is a liberal stronghold, and her day-to-day activities likely revolved around talking to important and wealthy people about almost anything else but actionable policy. She's convenient because she probably ranks just behind President Biden in recognizability, panders on Twitter "excites the base", embodies the ideal image of the modern Democratic Party, but she's also convenient to Republicans because she is the poster child for the insular and elitist libtard outrage bait that conservatives eat up. Honestly, I don't really see a reason she has to go anywhere she doesn't want to unless it's the White House.
 
I think there's a chance she'll be removed. The Party's old guard see her as an outsider who rose too high above her station. I'm sure someone will make a push to oust her.
Depends. I think Pelosi views her as a useful idiot. She's too dumb to cause many problems for the old guard, can be trusted to fall in line when the whip is cracked, and serves as a way for the Progressives to look like they're being listened to even as their seat at the table is filled by a moron who makes them look bad.
 
They're doing this to clear her. She's a darling of the Democrat party, and the old guard knows she brings in the younger crowd. Millennials and Gen Z love people like her and they know it.
i cant stand Champaign socialist. her dress for just that night costs more than my entire wardrobe. these people are dispicable and the sooner they all hang form trees the better.
She always has a dumb excuse for that, but here's what I'd ask her:

"So, how long did you spend putting on makeup for the event to look pretty?"

You know that's why she really wanted to do it. Women love being seen.
 
i cant stand Champaign socialist. her dress for just that night costs more than my entire wardrobe. these people are dispicable and the sooner they all hang form trees the better.
No, don't you see? It's important for them to be rich and have a lot of money, eat good food, ride in limos and private jets, have expensive clothes, big houses, and fancy vacations so they can fight for the rights of the poor and save the planet!
 
Atrás
Top Abajo