How Much Legal Trouble Is AOC In? - Big Booty Bribes.

How Much Legal Trouble Is AOC In?

Story by John Rossomando

House Ethics Panel Says AOC May Have Broken the Law - The circumstances surrounding Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (or AOC) attendance - and, more importantly, her wardrobe choices and cost - at the exclusive 2021 Met Gala last year may have broken federal law and House rules, the bipartisan Board of the Office of Congressional Ethics decided in a 5-0 vote several months back. To this day, the mater is not resolved.

“…he Board finds that there is substantial reason to believe that Rep. Ocasio-Cortez accepted impermissible gifts associated with her attendance at the Met Gala,” the Board of the Office of Congressional Ethics found in its ruling, released Thursday. “Accordingly, the Board recommends that the Committee further review the above allegation that Rep. Ocasio-Cortez accepted impermissible gifts associated with her attendance at the Met Gala.”

What Did AOC Do?​

The rental of her “Tax the Rich” dress cost $1,200. The matching shoes cost $635. The handbag rental cost $170 for a total of $2,283, including sales tax. A Sept. 9, 2021, bill was provided by a publicist for Brother Vellies, which provided Ocasio-Cortez’ outfit for the Met Gala, to one of the congresswoman’s campaign staffers.

A revised bill dated Sept. 20 reduced the gown rental to $300 and the overall rental to $990. The committee interviewed the campaign staffer about the discrepancy between the first bill and the second bill, and was unable to explain the change. Brother Vellies declined to cooperate with the committee.


AOC was supposed to have paid the invoice for the rental but only did so after the committee began its investigation. The rental company and the woman who did the congresswoman’s hair identified $5,799.99 worth of unpaid bills related to Ocasio-Cortez’s gown rental, transportation, room rental, and shoes and boetie rented by Ocasio-Cortez’s boyfriend.

Conde Nast Transportation paid the outstanding $5,799 on May 10, 2022.

The report stated that “Rep. Ocasio-Cortez may not have paid for several thousands of dollars’ worth of goods and services provided to her” had it not been for the committee investigation.


House rules prohibit members of Congress from accepting any “gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value.” This includes “gifts of services, training, transportation, lodging, and meals, whether provided in kind, by purchase of a ticket, payment in advance, or reimbursement after the expense has been incurred.”

AOC Strikes Back​

The congresswoman disputes that her delayed payment equaled the services being impermissible gifts. Ocasio-Cortez’s office rebutted the report in a statement to NBC News:

“Though no Ethics violation has been found, the Office of Congressional Ethics ('OCE') did identify that there were delays in paying vendors for costs associated with the Congresswoman’s attendance at the Met Gala. The Congresswoman finds these delays unacceptable, and she has taken several steps to ensure nothing of this nature will happen again,” it said.

"However, while regrettable, these delayed payments definitively do not rise to the level of a violation of House Rules. Even after OCE’s exhaustive review of the Congresswoman’s personal communications, there is no record of the Congresswoman refusing to pay for these expenses. To the contrary, there are several explicit, documented communications, from prior to OCE’s review, that show the Congresswoman understood that she had to pay for these expenses from her own personal funds — as she ultimately did.”

The full House Ethics Committee will take up the case; however, Ocasio-Cortez likely will escape with a slap on the wrist.

John Rossomando’s work has been featured in numerous publications such as The American Thinker, Daily Wire, Red Alert Politics, CNSNews.com, The Daily Caller, Human Events, Newsmax, The American Spectator, TownHall.com, and Crisis Magazine. He also served as senior managing editor of The Bulletin, a 100,000-circulation daily newspaper in Philadelphia, and received the Pennsylvania Associated Press Managing Editors first-place award in 2008 for his reporting.

[ Article | Archive ]
 
She's a member of Congress too new and retarded to understand/ She'll probably get a nothing censure and a talking-to on how to grift better. That's about it.
 
She's a member of Congress too new and retarded to understand/ She'll probably get a nothing censure and a talking-to on how to grift better. That's about it.
One thing I want to point out is how absurdly expensive everything was for one night. It's just laughable to see all of these "socialists" bitching about how people need to be taxed more when they themselves own three personal houses and pay more for one night than many people make in a month. I'm not against people being rich, but it's the constant hypocrisy that bothers me.
 
One thing I want to point out is how absurdly expensive everything was for one night. It's just laughable to see all of these "socialists" bitching about how people need to be taxed more when they themselves own three personal houses and pay more for one night than many people make in a month. I'm not against people being rich, but it's the constant hypocrisy that bothers me.
i cant stand Champaign socialist. her dress for just that night costs more than my entire wardrobe. these people are dispicable and the sooner they all hang form trees the better.
 
One thing I want to point out is how absurdly expensive everything was for one night. It's just laughable to see all of these "socialists" bitching about how people need to be taxed more when they themselves own three personal houses and pay more for one night than many people make in a month. I'm not against people being rich, but it's the constant hypocrisy that bothers me.
Indeed. Being wealthy is one thing. Flaunting that wealth to express your supposed virtue is another.
 
Is your abuelita still broke af? Support her, you grifting big bootied champagne socialist.
 
Indeed. Being wealthy is one thing. Flaunting that wealth to express your supposed virtue is another.
It's way worse than just flaunting it, it's flaunting it to express that fake virtue while also proclaiming no one else should have the ability to retain any wealth.

It's like if Boogie showed up to an orphanage and ate all of their food because it would help save the starving children from obesity.
 
Congress is the Olympics of corruption and AOC's wardrobe for one night of virtue signaling is Little League stuff. Nobody's going to punish her over this.

That aside, what's this about a so-called "rental" of a dress? Are we supposed to believe they just had a "TAX THE RICH" dress lying around waiting to be rented? If you look at photos of the event, this was clearly custom work - not just someone pinning on some letters to be taken off at the end of the night. That dress was created specifically for this event, and has zero rental value after this. It should have been billed as a sale (or donation) of a custom tailored dress. Calling it a rental is just fraud on top of fraud.
 
That aside, what's this about a so-called "rental" of a dress? Are we supposed to believe they just had a "TAX THE RICH" dress lying around waiting to be rented? If you look at photos of the event, this was clearly custom work - not just someone pinning on some letters to be taken off at the end of the night. That dress was created specifically for this event, and has zero rental value after this. It should have been billed as a sale (or donation) of a custom tailored dress. Calling it a rental is just fraud on top of fraud.

Well, the creator may want it back as a showpiece or for future value. Nightgown costs a lot to make, custom ones even more (a proper haute couture, ie custom made, nightgown can cost hundreds of thousands), and they can retain some historical value.

I doubt AOC has the money to buy a custom made dress and keep it - only for never being able to wear it again (1 - where would she wear it? 2- you don't just wear a Met Gala look again). However, a designer proposing to make one that will show up in photos for the Met Gala? Very possible. That designer of course will be so kind to not make you pay for the whole dress, just to rent it.

AOC gets a dress for cheap (relatively). The designer gets the publicity and keeps the dress to show somewhere for now, and maybe sell later on once it appreciate even more in value

You think most of the artists invited have the money to buy haute couture Chanel every year? Most of those dresses are rented.
 
Every now and then AOC gets accused of something and then it gets dropped as soon as she falls in line. Her low IQ results in her getting blackmailed and extorted easily. I’m convinced this is nothing more than a typical reminder that she’s a junior congressman who will never actually have power.
 
I doubt AOC has the money to buy a custom made dress and keep it
Of course she doesn't. But someone made her a custom dress anyway without billing or reporting the actual value of that gift. (Unless you think the original figure of $1300 covered the entire cost, which I don't)
At least if someone's renting a Chanel dress, the owner can keep renting it out and make money on it. Nobody is renting AOC's custom dress - it's a RINO (Rental In Name Only).

But yes, I'm sure this sort of arrangement is common in red-carpet circles.
 
The only way forward for America is to either bring back the guillotine or string a couple of these piece of shit politicians up around the reflecting pool.
 
AOC is not a congresswoman. She is a social media influencer who happens to have a seat in Congress. She does not care about those who are oppressed and marginalized, she cares about her own bank account and e-fame.

There is a special circle of hell waiting for every elected official that uses their office as a platform to self-aggrandize on Twitter instead of doing the job they were elected to do.
 
Última edición:
I swear to God if she gets censured or prosecuted over the "Tax the Rich" dress I'm going to have to schedule surgery for a laughter-induced hernia.
 
bring back the guillotine
I know just the lemonade salesman for the job
1687743535030.png
 
I'll never forget the picture of this ugly spic bitch beaming in her socjus dress in the middle of covid while all the workers behind her stood in black masks and every fucking liberal ate it up.
 
She's a member of Congress too new and retarded to understand/ She'll probably get a nothing censure and a talking-to on how to grift better. That's about it.
I think there's a chance she'll be removed. The Party's old guard see her as an outsider who rose too high above her station. I'm sure someone will make a push to oust her.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo