Hermaneutics in the Bible

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
And somewhat the same with the Talmud though that's outside my wheelhouse.
As far as I know, the Talmud always give multiple interpretations. It's not so much an Exegesis of the Torah than recordings of debates on juridic laws between rabbis disagreeing with each others. That's why you can found many antisemitic quotes with things like "Can you sleep with 3 years old girls ?", because it's some kind of colloquium on extreme cases with rabbis trying to find a theological answer. It doesn't excuse the fact that they don't unanimously condemn it, but Jews can refuse it so it's way better than Islamic juridiction where you're obligated to accept Muhammad raped Aisha at 9 year old or you're not Muslim.
 
As far as I know, the Talmud always give multiple interpretations. It's not so much an Exegesis of the Torah than recordings of debates on juridic laws between rabbis disagreeing with each others. That's why you can found many antisemitic quotes with things like "Can you sleep with 3 years old girls ?", because it's some kind of colloquium on extreme cases with rabbis trying to find a theological answer. It doesn't excuse the fact that they don't unanimously condemn it, but Jews can refuse it so it's way better than Islamic juridiction where you're obligated to accept Muhammad raped Aisha at 9 year old or you're not Muslim.
Indeed. I wrote "somewhat" as a qualifier for a reason. It's a bit of a mid-point between Islam's Hadiths and Christianity's more usual "here is a Bible, what do you think" approach. Plainly the Talmud is still a big factor as many an unfortunate chicken has found out. It's somewhat a matter of sect size, I think. Not every religious Jew thinks they can do what they like so long as they string up a bit of wire around the city block or make a lift stop at at every floor. But nearly all Muslims are falling into one of two big groups of Hadiths. Whereas even within the many different sects of Christianity there's massive personal room for interpretation in most cases.

My main thought on the Talmud is that it looks like a prime candidate for using the GIT version control software, instead of all those cramped little note overlays, as I said to a Jewish acquaintance last year.

Anyway, my main point was that in Christianity it's acknowledged that the writings are human and that this is a strength. In Islam, they (Mohammed's words) are human but not acknowledged to be so and this is a problem.
 
Sumerian (Atrahasis), Babylonian (Epic of Gilgamesh), Hindu, Greek, Indigenous traditions — all involving a great flood sent by the gods and a chosen survivor or survivors. That’s a cross-cultural pattern, not isolated to one text. To those that don't understand how the Bible was written, it was basically basing real events and people using pseudonyms (like Moses to which there's no evidence he existed or the Israelites were captives in Egypt, although there was the Hyksos expulsion, which were a Canaanite group; the scribes wrote the law and there's no evidence Moses existed) to teach moral lessons. The Black Sea deluge was a catastrophic flooding when the rising Aegean Sea waters breached the Bosporus, turning a freshwater lake into a sea, killing and displacing neolithic farmers, and burying an ancient civilization (underwater excavations and surveys off the Turkish Black Sea coast have revealed well-preserved remains of ancient, submerged,, and sunken structures, including timber-framed buildings and artifacts. These discoveries are widely cited as evidence of a rapid, catastrophic drowning of the coastal landscape, frequently associated with the "Black Sea Deluge Hypothesis" circa 5600 BCE, which posits that rising Mediterranean waters breached the Bosporus, turning a freshwater lake into the saline Black Sea). But even then, it was a regional flood, not worldwide like the Bible said.

In fact, Jesus even spoke in parables. It was to convey a moral lesson. I'm an IFB (Independent Fundamental Baptist). I believe in the Big Bang, but I also believe that God caused it. Obviously, I don't believe the world is flat or there was a worldwide flood that nobody's heard about.
 
Ok, but what is the point you want to convey with this post ?
Maybe I'm retarded, but I don't understand what you expect of this.
 
Lemme stop you right there. The Flood is not an allegory. It literally happened. Ken Ham and his team have spent decades collecting and collating evidence, and it's undeniable.
You can believe in the Bible and science. Georges Lemaître is the perfect example of this balance. Catholic priest, serious physicist, father of the Big Bang theory. He actually pushed back when people tried to use the Big Bang as a “proof” of Genesis, because he believed that science explains physical beginnings, theology explains ultimate meaning. Two different layers, not rivals.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo