HBO’s Watchmen - NOTHING EVER ENDS...Except When It Should

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The main problem with Watchmen is the Pirate Story is one of the most important themes, and it's kind of impossible to get that with a miniseries. The Pirate Story is so brilliant because its reflective of Veidt's journey without the ego, without the narcissism. That he was the monster all along. The monsters weren't hunting him, they were calling him home. He was never good, or brilliant or this sterling figure. He was the worst of them all. He murdered women and children. He destroyed people's lives. He was worse than a rapist and a murderer, he defilied his very identity with what he did, and its basically Moore telling the audience Veidt's true nature and journey through unclouded eyes.

It really is one of the most brilliant pieces of fiction and basically 'The Watchmen' is a pinnacle of the genre. Its this way, because you don't even have to look at it as a deconstruction of the genre. You can take it just at its face value as a story and it WORKS. That's what these faggot creators don't understand. THE BEST political works in HISTORY always worked as stories first, allegories second. You put the story first, because you need something that ties this together metaphorically. And it needs to be really fucking good. Its like any good political speech. Any good piece of literature. Any good scientific paper. Tell people a story. Draw them in.

Storytelling doesn't just serve as secondary, it is PRIMARY in all of our writing. If you look at the best scientific papers published, they're telling you a story. A really good story, that's real, that you can follow, that has deeper meanings and implications. That's why I stress storytelling is so fucking important, because it isn't just for creatives. If you want to run for office, have a good story. You want a good scientific paper or experiment, have a good story for it. You want to invent a new program or app, same deal. The words, audience jargon and language might all be different, but its still the same at its core: telling a good goddamn story. Read Origin of the Species. Any layman can do it and understand it without knowing a thing about biology, because of the story it tells, the way its framed, and the way its reached its conclusions. Why were people taken in by Theranos, when if you looked at the thing even cursory, the device itself broke the laws of physics? It told a good story. Like any con does. Any good lie, any good manipulation, at its heart, has a good story.

To ignore story-telling in favor of political garbage will always end in failure. Storytelling is basically the most potent form of human communication because we can all understand it. Its how we communicated our history before we even invented writing. It is the BASIS for everything. Just think of any inspiring speech, any revolutionary discovery. My favorite all-time noble prize is the guy who discovered that ulcers weren't produced from stress, but from bacteria. Why? Its an awesome fucking story. Its also the only Australian noble prize. The guy was called crazy, had all his experiments shut down, and to prove it, he drank the bacteria himself. That's a good fucking story with also an important scientific message behind it: Science is human. If they call you crazy, you keep going. No matter what.

Sorry to go on a complete rant about storytelling, but I'm getting tired of it being thrown to the wayside. Its probably one of the most important, overlooked, skills to have. I love to write, I know narrative structure. Any scientific presentation I do tells a story. Its got threads, beginnings, middles, and endings. Its got twists and turns. The language and topics I use are different, but the fundamentals are the same.

To just grab material and take the storytelling out of it and jam your own political beliefs in it is fucking mind boggling to me. For one, its not going to work. People can see what you're doing, because fact of the matter is, people aren't fucking re.tarded. Like I said, storytelling was the fundamental basis for human communication before there was every any written language. Its almost instinctual in us. And there's a difference between storytelling and outright propaganda. Propaganda isn't storytelling. Its message first, story later or never. Its a sledgehammer while storytelling is a scalpel. I patently see what they're doing, what they want to imply. That wasn't a trailer for a story. That was a trailer for a propaganda piece. All style, no substance, its message is easily clear while whatever story beats are irrelevant or make 0 sense in terms of the source material or even reality wise. (Which my post was meant to illustrate, I know these questions have no answers because no one thought about them).

If you want to insert your politics and intersectionality into a piece, fine. Then tell me a good story. If not, fuck off with your propaganda. You're fucking failures in the most basic art of human communication fucking disgusts me more than your politics. That's why we're seeing this creatively bankrupt shit. Its only a means to push 'orange man bad'. Yes, I understand. You aren't brilliant. You're not controversial. You share a popular opinion with 50% of the country, how fucking brave. I don't care. Tell me a story. Or just shut your fucking mouth.

Moore got angry when the V for Vendetta movie made an allegory between the villain and Dubya. He based the original story on Thatcherism and argued that the story has no point if you remove that aspect of his comic. He definitely wouldn't agree with the very concept of this show with the really heavy liberties it's taking with the source material, but he takes political influences on his stories really seriously.


I've always argued that Watchmen might work best as a miniseries. While Watchmen was created as a comic first and foremost and is meant to be read that way (which is also the crux of Moore's argument, and a legitimate one like that), the average length of the miniseries allows for more detail and greater ability to adapt the story. I recall Snyder saying that a movie that had everything would take like 12 hours. It wouldn't be a perfect adaptation since even then you'd miss on the brilliant compositions of the comic, but at the very least it'd tell the story more efficiently.

At least I argued that until this show became a thing. It's like, you have one of the best comics ever written but instead of adapting it for a decent miniseries you just make it a sequel but not really and make the stupid "the story didn't say it had to be x and y" argument in changing shit that didn't need to be changed.

Of course it didn't. Alan Moore, for all his beliefs (and they're fucking weird) is a storyteller first. Any one of his many works can tell you that. He cares about story-craft. It definitely was embedded in the Thatcher-era and the iron fear of it, but again, you didn't even need that. Most people saw it as a good story first and foremost. And that's the important thing.

I don't think Watchmen can be filmed, really. Firstly, you're basically losing a lot of themes if you do, because a lot of shit in Watchmen takes time to process. I LOVE Blood Meridian, but that fucking novel has NO PUNCTUATION, uses archaic words for nearly everything and has untranslated Spanish. To read that fucking thing, I had to sit down with a notebook and comb through it. But its still one of the best novels I ever read. Because you have to put in the work to understand it and the value you get from discovering it is immense. I have no clue how Cormac McCarthy wrote it, because holy shit. And don't say mescaline, because there's no way a man on mescaline could cognitively find the archaic word for bucket and use it properly without punctuation.

But anyway, Watchmen would only work as a very slow paced drama. Problem is you'd need to watch it like two or three times to take it all in. And most Superhero shit these days is far from slow paced. I just disagree it can be filmed in any form. Its just too much of a deconstruction and you need lots of time to process what's going on.
 
I mean, 'The Watchmen' you have a theme of madness, this....sense that a lie can somehow create peace, and when do you compromise? And the fucking ultimate line (COMPLETELY RUINED by the movie. "Ends? Nothing ever ends, Adrian." Implying what he did WILL NOT LAST and will have consequences that even he cannot forsee). Also fuck Synder for implying that they chose Rosarch's novel at the end of the movie. That was left up to the reader and only served to reinforce Ozymandias' sacrifice would be short lived no matter what, making his drama and sacrifice an act of his own madness. Ozymandias is no hero, he is a villain, forcing the heroes to be complicit in his lie in the short term, which Roach, an absolutist hero cannot understand or abide by. Which is why he dies. The other heroes understand temporary silence is neccessary, but they know there will be a day when they will have to deal with Ozymandias' consequences.

The Watchmen is a story warning against moral absolutism and the 'Ends Justify the Means' and how power cannot save us. 'The Watchmen" is so rich story-telling wise, the ending leaving everyone forced into this secret, waiting for the lie to break. Because they KNOW its going to break. Even Ozymandias himself is waiting, that's why it parallels with the pirate comic so much. He's on that ship of madness, his crimes following him. He was the monster all along.

To translate that into a 'woke' series doesn't work. Because its basically a story about humanity itself. That we will destroy ourselves. That we can make up as many lies as we want, we can commit any amount of horrors along the way. We're still fucking doomed. Which goes right back to the Comedian. "It's all a fucking Joke." It breaks his fucking mind, the guy who killed a woman he got pregnant in 'nam. That's how horrific the plot of Watchmen is, that's how much of a monster Ozymandias is, and how fucked the human race is in that Ozymanday's represents our hope. Its really all about how the Human Race is a joke, and the heroes and villains are so small in the scope of our own united desire for self-destruction. Comedian represents all the themes and ideas of Watchmen, along with the pirate comic. Personally, it is the most uniquely narrative, story and character rich comic ever written. Also, not even Ozymandias understands how much of a monster he is until the very fucking last panel.

Somehow I don't think HBO will be able to capture this.

These are some of the best thoughts I've read in regards to Watchman.

I don't think it's a story about humanity and how we destroy ourselves, I think it's closer to the original Juvenal quote of "who watches the watchmen". It is not in essence about self-destruction as much as it is about our limitations. The "superheroes" have their own conspiracy of secret against the public and the one who would not agree to keep it secret it killed.

I don't think the story is in essence as nihilist as you describe it here, that the human race is joke and we're all united in self-destruction. Because the comic book doesn't really go into the human race as a whole. Instead it focuses on a very small group of people. As Alan Moore says in an interview: "The majority of writers that had come before us, had never thought of challenging the assumptions (...) there is that element of wouldn't these characters be a joke if they were in the real world? (...) Wouldn't these characters be kind of sad and touching in the real world?"


It's less about humanity being doomed; after all in some sense it is salvation that those in power can not sustain a lie indefinitaly. Like the family members of the marooned guy in the black freighter, they are not doomed, the city of jonestown itself is not plundered by the black freighter. And tough New York may be destroyed, humanity lives on.



So uhhh....what? The backdrop of the Watchmen and all its themes were in the Cold War. It doesn't work in modern day because we don't have any analogue to the cold war. We've got no Doomsday clock.

We've got one. It's global warming. *Cough cough*. Sorry I mean, climate change. Gotta be inclusive to the idea that global cooling might be catastrophicly irreversable in 2 years from now.

Of all the media and political stories out there, the only two doomsday tomorrow events that I know are climate change and perhaps demographic winter.
 
All this "woke" shit * be it comics,Video games,movies,tv * is going to age like spoiled milk when Trump is out of office.

I really don't understand why the entire entertainment media's decided to commit suicide because of a Temper Tantrum.

If they didn't do it for Bush why the fuck does Trump trigger them so much?
 

7334a495-159a-48b8-9f94-78902e4818f3-jpeg.751311


c27b87f7-8c5e-48b2-b675-e8db70105506-jpeg.751315

We are no one. We are everyone. We are invisible.

I see a christian sign in the background, so going by hollywood standards, the Rorschach movement would be essentially a hypocritical, evil movement. It's also using that v for vendetta/chanology type of WE ARE ANONYMOUS, which is about 10 years out of date, because nobody is anonymous anymore, with every device spying and listening to what you're saying and with political internet having only the tiniest areas of anonymity.

The scythe with skull and bones is very muddled imagery, because a scythe is a symbol of working the land and of the grim reaper, while the skull and bones is a symbol of piracy (at least in context of a watchman related work). The location and people depicted would point towards rural meaning rather than grim reaper meaning. A farmer is practically a symbol of the opposite of what a pirate is. Very muddled imagery. They probably thought "death + death!", which is very poor, because if you have one, you don't need the other.

The other two images look like a globalist re-imagining of the US flag and some futuristic globalist kind of symbol, which I assume would be outside Veidt's house.

The worst part of this show is going to be that they'll probably equate the Rorschach movement as unwittingly ending world peace with their persuit of the truth. The moral of the story will be that you should trust the system, trust the plan in Q like fashion. Calling it now. It will be essentially an anti-watchmen show. Watchman was about abuse of power, about "who watches the watchmen", that it's hard to ever trust someone else to watch over you (or your wife).

I think this show will be exactly about the opposite.

And it's a shame. With clown-world, it's clear that this kind of anonymous culture is much more aligned with the comedian than Rorschach, people that laugh at what a joke everything is, while themselves being just as much mirrors of it any time one's anonymity ends.


Edit: one more catch from the trailer. Will the Rorschach movement be flat earthers?

moonlanding.PNG
 
Última edición:
Than why use Watchmen at all? People who don't read Watchmen but saw the movie will be confused because its not a sequel and people who read the comic will be fucking furious. So is this for like, people who heard, 'Oh Watchmen is that famous comic thingy.' How the fuck do you even do marketing on that?

Because if they didn't, we wouldn't be talking about it now.
 
I don't think Watchmen can be filmed, really. Firstly, you're basically losing a lot of themes if you do, because a lot of shit in Watchmen takes time to process. I LOVE Blood Meridian, but that fucking novel has NO PUNCTUATION, uses archaic words for nearly everything and has untranslated Spanish. To read that fucking thing, I had to sit down with a notebook and comb through it. But its still one of the best novels I ever read. Because you have to put in the work to understand it and the value you get from discovering it is immense. I have no clue how Cormac McCarthy wrote it, because holy shit. And don't say mescaline, because there's no way a man on mescaline could cognitively find the archaic word for bucket and use it properly without punctuation.

Great effortpost. Also, I'm interested to see you're a Blood Meridian fan. I had a class where I had to read it, but I just couldn't get through it. I really wanted to, since I liked the idea of the book, but it was hard for me to follow.

You've motivated me to take another look at it.
 
Veidt is evil as they come, but the problem is, his intentions are noble. He is never outright villainous, but extremely coldly logical.

This line kept haunting me since I read it. It doesn't seem to tell the full story. Extremely logical? Yes. But COLDLY so?

There are more than a few hints about not just his good intentions, but his warmth. It requires a degree of empathy and warmth to consciously try to imagine the suffering you've caused, to have the deep feelings of guilt that will no doubt haunt him.



feel.jpg


It's also in the movie, but lol, nobody believes this actor when he says that line. He's playing Veidt as a villain which is exactly the wrong choice.


There's this warmth and emotion to Veidt that really nails him as a character considering what he's done and is another way he contrasts with Rorschach.
emotion.jpg
 
Also, I'm interested to see you're a Blood Meridian fan. I had a class where I had to read it, but I just couldn't get through it. I really wanted to, since I liked the idea of the book, but it was hard for me to follow.

You've motivated me to take another look at it.

I had trouble getting through it. The violence is just awful.

It's my favorite novel of all time now. Definitely give it another shot.
 
Watchmen is overrated and if I had to choose between it existing and erasing it to erase it's legacy I would pick the later in an instant (the Bronze age of comics already did tackle dark subjects and just look at Watchmen legacy, more bad came out from it, The Killing Joke and stuff like that which created eras of shit from people who misunderstood them) Alan Moore was a bitter man that wanted comics to go a different direction and is now bitter that his legacy isn't what he wants it to be and fuck deconstructioism
 
Great effortpost. Also, I'm interested to see you're a Blood Meridian fan. I had a class where I had to read it, but I just couldn't get through it. I really wanted to, since I liked the idea of the book, but it was hard for me to follow.

You've motivated me to take another look at it.

And thanks. Its no doubt a tough read, both for its content and structure. But its one of the best American Novels ever written so its worth the investment it takes to get through it. The problem with a class and this book is you REALLY need to slow down to process it, because without the punctuation it is extraordinarily difficult. So now that isn't required reading, you can slow your roll and read it at your own pace.

This line kept haunting me since I read it. It doesn't seem to tell the full story. Extremely logical? Yes. But COLDLY so?

There are more than a few hints about not just his good intentions, but his warmth. It requires a degree of empathy and warmth to consciously try to imagine the suffering you've caused, to have the deep feelings of guilt that will no doubt haunt him.



Ver archivo adjunto 776442

It's also in the movie, but lol, nobody believes this actor when he says that line. He's playing Veidt as a villain which is exactly the wrong choice.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=efx_DNUQkX0:268
There's this warmth and emotion to Veidt that really nails him as a character considering what he's done and is another way he contrasts with Rorschach.Ver archivo adjunto 776443

I just felt he was just so fucking fake. He was faking it with Manhattan and whenever he had an audience. He comes off to me as this sociopathic, manipulative liar. He exudes warmth, but only its perception. He doesn't actually feel it. He doesn't REALLY feel what those people felt. How could he? He was righteous. He knew. To me, that frown in the last panel says it all. There's no more show to put on. There's only this emptiness.

Look at his line: "I've known I've struggled across the backs of murdered innocents to save humanity, but someone had to take the weight of that awful, terrible crime."

Compare that to the beginning of the pirate story, when he floats out on the backs of corpses. They're only a tool for him. They're bringing him home. Home to the monster that he is. Unfeeling. Uncaring. Unremoseful. Cold and empty.

You can also view it another way: Rorschach is uncompromising honesty, truth, even in the face of annihilation. Veidt, manipulation, survival at any cost, lying and the death of millions, to save the world.

I had trouble getting through it. The violence is just awful.

It's my favorite novel of all time now. Definitely give it another shot.

What, you didn't like when

the babies get their brains splattered on trees when the Indians full on just fucking take them and smack them with full force on the trunk?
 
I just felt he was just so fucking fake. He was faking it with Manhattan and whenever he had an audience. He comes off to me as this sociopathic, manipulative liar. He exudes warmth, but only its perception. He doesn't actually feel it. He doesn't REALLY feel what those people felt. How could he? He was righteous. He knew. To me, that frown in the last panel says it all. There's no more show to put on. There's only this emptiness.

Look at his line: "I've known I've struggled across the backs of murdered innocents to save humanity, but someone had to take the weight of that awful, terrible crime."

Compare that to the beginning of the pirate story, when he floats out on the backs of corpses. They're only a tool for him. They're bringing him home. Home to the monster that he is. Unfeeling. Uncaring. Unremoseful. Cold and empty.

You can also view it another way: Rorschach is uncompromising honesty, truth, even in the face of annihilation. Veidt, manipulation, survival at any cost, lying and the death of millions, to save the world.

There's something very powerful in the comparison you draw between struggling over the backs of murdered innocents in both stories.

But there is another comparison between both the black freighter story and veidt: They are both motivated by love. He wants to save his wife. "Everything I loved, everything I lived for depended upon my reaching davidstown in advance of that terrible freighter". Veidt is similar. It's not stated explicitly, but everything he loves and lives for depends on him reaching world peace in advance of nuclear annihilation.

It's the essential problem of the idea of "the ends justify the means", which always makes sense until you remember that there is a failure rate. Is it worth it to kill one city to save the world? This is mentioned earlier when dr Manhattan teleports a crowd back into their homes, causing two heart-attacks "More would have suffered during a riot, I'm certain".
I think it's hard to argue against the mathematical cold logic of it. But is it worth it to kill one city to fail at saving the world? Or if there is a 10% failure rate?

That's where the guilt comes from. It's mirrored in him luring manhattan into an intrinsic field generator and activating it (with his cat inside). You can see the genuine grief on Veidt's face. And this too is an example of a failed "ends justify the means", because it didn't end dr. manhattan either.

I always wondered why that scene was there and thought it just a foil of ultimate weapons, but it's there to show us both Veidt's willingness to sacrifice his closest companion, his grief for doing so and the futility of doing so, when we can never be certain of the results of our actions.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo