Greer v. Aguilar, 2:25-cv-02581 - Another lawsuit from Greer, this time it's about whores

Greer v. Aguilar 2:25-cv-02581 — District Court, D. Nevada

  • Docket No.
    2:25-cv-02581
  • Court
    District Court, D. Nevada
  • Filed
    21 de Dic, 2025
  • Nature of Suit
    440 Civil Rights: Other
  • Cause
    42:1983 Civil Rights Act
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    5 de Jul, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
Cisco Aguilar, Russell Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 35)

# Date Description Filing
29 5 de Jul, 2026 Consent for Electronic Service of Documents by Plaintiff Russell Greer. (AMMi) (Entered: 07/07/2026) PDF
28 29 de Mar, 2026 Third AMENDED COMPLAINT against Cisco Aguilar by Russell Greer. No changes to parties. (Filed per ECF No. 27 - MAM) (Entered: 03/31/2026) PDF
27 29 de Mar, 2026 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 3/30/2026. Before this Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. ECF No. 26. This Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to detach the third amended complaint at ECF No. 26-2 and file it separately on the docket. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KNH) (Entered: 03/30/2026)
29 de Mar, 2026  
26 11 de Mar, 2026 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Russell Greer. Responses are due by 3/26/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Proposed Third Amended Complaint)(MAM) (pleading) (Entered: 03/12/2026) 1 2 3
If Russell has the required 5 signatures, what does he gain by suing the state of Nevada to remove the 5 signature requirement?
There was probably something that happened and we don't know about which made the 2024 attempt fail, like a signer backing out after the fact.

Very unlikely but more amusing answer would be that Russ forgot to tell ChatGPT about his success in that county, only the failures in others, and the rest of the legal theory was invented from there.
 
There was probably something that happened and we don't know about which made the 2024 attempt fail, like a signer backing out after the fact.
Well, he did successfully file it with Lincoln County. The document in the emails U_M got had the clerk's stamp on it from March 2024. He probably just failed to get signatures, or was too lazy to try.

FWIW I looked up all the signers' addresses. The first 3 are houses that haven't been sold since 2024. The last 2 signers live in the same apartment; it's Section 8 housing in town, so I can't tell if anyone moved. None of them seem to have an online presence to check if they moved, but I didn't look very deep.

Also, I don't think any of them were mentioned as the volunteers Greer talked about in this suit. Lincoln was mentioned the emails he included as exhibits, and we only know about the 5 signatures because of that Scribd account it leaked. Whether the sponsors backed out, or he failed on his own, it seems completely intentional that he left out his initial success from the lawsuit. Combine that with that December email saying he was going to re-file it in 2026, sent on the same day he filed this lawsuit, and it's as irrefutable proof of intentional fraud as you can get.

As far as legal theories go, it's probably as simple and retarded as "I tried in 6 places and only succeeded once, therefore it's too hard and illegal".
 
Jesus H. Christ, how many times is he going to amend this turd. You can gussy up a turd all you want, but it's still a fucking turd.
Has this retard seriously filed an original suit, and then three amended complaints to it, while never serving the defendant?
 
Has this retard seriously filed an original suit, and then three amended complaints to it, while never serving the defendant?
You're approaching this as a rational person seeking to make a long term change. Russ doesn't care about the lawsuit itself. He needs the emergency ex parted injunction. The special exception just for him. That would allow him to get his world changing hookers on the ballot for this election. Actually arguing the case is years down the road. He'll have moved on by then.

He just wants the retard exception to the rules that he has been given all of his life. He's asking teacher. Better the other kids don't know.
 
You're approaching this as a rational person seeking to make a long term change. Russ doesn't care about the lawsuit itself. He needs the emergency ex parted injunction. The special exception just for him. That would allow him to get his world changing hookers on the ballot for this election.
I just realized something. Emailing the clerk that he'll be collecting signatures in Lincoln this year, on the same day he filed this lawsuit, has a second implication beyond mere fraud. Begging for emergency injunctions to get on the ballot in other counties this year, implies Greer thinks he can run petitions and initiatives in two places at once. :story:

This lazy pest couldn't get a petition going in 2024 even with his 5 signatures committee, and he couldn't make a meeting in Lincoln within a 2 month window. How does he think he's going to collect hundreds of signatures, on an unpopular subject, in multiple counties within the 3-4 months he'd have before the submission cutoff?
 
The magistrate granted Russ' request to submit a third amended complaint:
1774900815185.png

Now Russ just has to serve the Nevada Attorney General (for real, not by emailing the 'contact us' address).
 
The clerk has detached the amended complaint, not going to post it since we've seen it before.
2026-03-31_16-34.png
But now we should see some progress on Greer properly serving the secretary of state.

Hahahahahaahahahahaha, sorry.
 
He needs the emergency ex parted injunction. The special exception just for him. That would allow him to get his world changing hookers on the ballot for this election.
Speaking of those world changing hookers, while catching up ITT, I couldn’t help but notice the fact that the Brothel Prince’s working definition of sex worker only refers to women. Is that even legal nowadays? (I’ve done a brief search for naught & thought someone else ITT may know, off hand).

IIRC, discrimination in employment on the basis of protected characteristics or class still includes sex class, male or female. I know there are some ancient and outdated, (for modern times,) laws still on the books, especially state by state, but I can’t think of one state offhand that still allows blatant discrimination via sex. Clearly it happens but by law it’s not really permitted, to the best of my current knowledge.

Brothel Gimp defines his world class hookers as “females over 18, HIV negative,” in his official measure from a document or two ago. Now, regardless of if this is still permitted, realistic or not, Greee is also cutting off potentially 50% of his possible support by discriminating against the world changing male hookers, (and those who desire them,) of the world. That’s a lot of fantasy-Greee-land support to cut off from the get-go.
 
Speaking of those world changing hookers, while catching up ITT, I couldn’t help but notice the fact that the Brothel Prince’s working definition of sex worker only refers to women.
Actually Russ has talked in the past about having gay/bi dudes there to service faggots. From his lawsuit against Utah:
Herbert.PNG
From the Intimate Dealings website:
ID.PNG

Do note however that the dudes are there solely to service other dudes. The idea of hiring male workers for female clients never crosses his mind, presumably because in his mind the only place for a woman in a brothel is as a hooker.
 
Do note however that the dudes are there solely to service other dudes. The idea of hiring male workers for female clients never crosses his mind, presumably because in his mind the only place for a woman in a brothel is as a hooker.
No Im sure he did think about female clientele, just in the worst way possible. He mentioned somewhere (I think the Mile High Neon pitch or the lawsuit to legalize prostitution in Utah) that he would have a bisexual man there to be shared between the gays and the women.
 
Speaking of those world changing hookers, while catching up ITT, I couldn’t help but notice the fact that the Brothel Prince’s working definition of sex worker only refers to women. Is that even legal nowadays? (I’ve done a brief search for naught & thought someone else ITT may know, off hand).
Your concern is probably academic, as of right now there is one legal male prostitute in all of Nevada. When he got licensed in 2025, he broke a streak of at least twelve years in which all Nevada prostitutes were women.

Can't have a sex discrimination suit if men weren't interested in working in a brothel in the first place.
 
Actually Russ has talked in the past about having gay/bi dudes there to service faggots. From his lawsuit against Utah:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807825
From the Intimate Dealings website:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807826

Do note however that the dudes are there solely to service other dudes. The idea of hiring male workers for female clients never crosses his mind, presumably because in his mind the only place for a woman in a brothel is as a hooker.

Rusty has clearly decided to embrace his inner chud and shun "the never ending string of letters" community.
 
Actually Russ has talked in the past about having gay/bi dudes there to service faggots. From his lawsuit against Utah:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807825
From the Intimate Dealings website:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807826

Do note however that the dudes are there solely to service other dudes. The idea of hiring male workers for female clients never crosses his mind, presumably because in his mind the only place for a woman in a brothel is as a hooker.
It nicely colludes with the rules he set forth in his brothel legalization docs for the ballot. No male sex workers allowed in those docs. Rusty lies a lot.
 
Actually Russ has talked in the past about having gay/bi dudes there to service faggots. From his lawsuit against Utah:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807825
From the Intimate Dealings website:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807826

Do note however that the dudes are there solely to service other dudes. The idea of hiring male workers for female clients never crosses his mind, presumably because in his mind the only place for a woman in a brothel is as a hooker.
This is somewhat outdated because he later clarified he will only hire 1 (one) man.

 
Atrás
Top Abajo