- Registrado
- 15 de Dic, 2015
If Russell has the required 5 signatures, what does he gain by suing the state of Nevada to remove the 5 signature requirement?
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | 5 de Jul, 2026 | Consent for Electronic Service of Documents by Plaintiff Russell Greer. (AMMi) (Entered: 07/07/2026) | |
| 28 | 29 de Mar, 2026 | Third AMENDED COMPLAINT against Cisco Aguilar by Russell Greer. No changes to parties. (Filed per ECF No. 27 - MAM) (Entered: 03/31/2026) | |
| 27 | 29 de Mar, 2026 | MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 3/30/2026. Before this Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. ECF No. 26. This Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to detach the third amended complaint at ECF No. 26-2 and file it separately on the docket. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KNH) (Entered: 03/30/2026) | |
| — | 29 de Mar, 2026 | ||
| 26 | 11 de Mar, 2026 | MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Russell Greer. Responses are due by 3/26/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Proposed Third Amended Complaint)(MAM) (pleading) (Entered: 03/12/2026) | 1 2 3 |
If Russell has the required 5 signatures, what does he gain by suing the state of Nevada to remove the 5 signature requirement?
Presumably other counties/cities like West Wendover who he has annoyed before.If Russell has the required 5 signatures, what does he gain by suing the state of Nevada to remove the 5 signature requirement?
Presumably other counties/cities like West Wendover who he has annoyed before.
There was probably something that happened and we don't know about which made the 2024 attempt fail, like a signer backing out after the fact.If Russell has the required 5 signatures, what does he gain by suing the state of Nevada to remove the 5 signature requirement?
Well, he did successfully file it with Lincoln County. The document in the emails U_M got had the clerk's stamp on it from March 2024. He probably just failed to get signatures, or was too lazy to try.There was probably something that happened and we don't know about which made the 2024 attempt fail, like a signer backing out after the fact.
Has this retard seriously filed an original suit, and then three amended complaints to it, while never serving the defendant?Jesus H. Christ, how many times is he going to amend this turd. You can gussy up a turd all you want, but it's still a fucking turd.
Can't eat any objections if the defendant is never served.Has this retard seriously filed an original suit, and then three amended complaints to it, while never serving the defendant?
You're approaching this as a rational person seeking to make a long term change. Russ doesn't care about the lawsuit itself. He needs the emergency ex parted injunction. The special exception just for him. That would allow him to get his world changing hookers on the ballot for this election. Actually arguing the case is years down the road. He'll have moved on by then.Has this retard seriously filed an original suit, and then three amended complaints to it, while never serving the defendant?
I just realized something. Emailing the clerk that he'll be collecting signatures in Lincoln this year, on the same day he filed this lawsuit, has a second implication beyond mere fraud. Begging for emergency injunctions to get on the ballot in other counties this year, implies Greer thinks he can run petitions and initiatives in two places at once.You're approaching this as a rational person seeking to make a long term change. Russ doesn't care about the lawsuit itself. He needs the emergency ex parted injunction. The special exception just for him. That would allow him to get his world changing hookers on the ballot for this election.
Speaking of those world changing hookers, while catching up ITT, I couldn’t help but notice the fact that the Brothel Prince’s working definition of sex worker only refers to women. Is that even legal nowadays? (I’ve done a brief search for naught & thought someone else ITT may know, off hand).He needs the emergency ex parted injunction. The special exception just for him. That would allow him to get his world changing hookers on the ballot for this election.
Actually Russ has talked in the past about having gay/bi dudes there to service faggots. From his lawsuit against Utah:Speaking of those world changing hookers, while catching up ITT, I couldn’t help but notice the fact that the Brothel Prince’s working definition of sex worker only refers to women.
No Im sure he did think about female clientele, just in the worst way possible. He mentioned somewhere (I think the Mile High Neon pitch or the lawsuit to legalize prostitution in Utah) that he would have a bisexual man there to be shared between the gays and the women.Do note however that the dudes are there solely to service other dudes. The idea of hiring male workers for female clients never crosses his mind, presumably because in his mind the only place for a woman in a brothel is as a hooker.
Your concern is probably academic, as of right now there is one legal male prostitute in all of Nevada. When he got licensed in 2025, he broke a streak of at least twelve years in which all Nevada prostitutes were women.Speaking of those world changing hookers, while catching up ITT, I couldn’t help but notice the fact that the Brothel Prince’s working definition of sex worker only refers to women. Is that even legal nowadays? (I’ve done a brief search for naught & thought someone else ITT may know, off hand).
Actually Russ has talked in the past about having gay/bi dudes there to service faggots. From his lawsuit against Utah:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807825
From the Intimate Dealings website:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807826
Do note however that the dudes are there solely to service other dudes. The idea of hiring male workers for female clients never crosses his mind, presumably because in his mind the only place for a woman in a brothel is as a hooker.
If you take him at his word, they're also there to service lesbians.Do note however that the dudes are there solely to service other dudes.
It nicely colludes with the rules he set forth in his brothel legalization docs for the ballot. No male sex workers allowed in those docs. Rusty lies a lot.Actually Russ has talked in the past about having gay/bi dudes there to service faggots. From his lawsuit against Utah:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807825
From the Intimate Dealings website:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807826
Do note however that the dudes are there solely to service other dudes. The idea of hiring male workers for female clients never crosses his mind, presumably because in his mind the only place for a woman in a brothel is as a hooker.
This is somewhat outdated because he later clarified he will only hire 1 (one) man.Actually Russ has talked in the past about having gay/bi dudes there to service faggots. From his lawsuit against Utah:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807825
From the Intimate Dealings website:
Ver archivo adjunto 8807826
Do note however that the dudes are there solely to service other dudes. The idea of hiring male workers for female clients never crosses his mind, presumably because in his mind the only place for a woman in a brothel is as a hooker.