GLITCH Productions - From the guys that brought you the Super Mario 64 bloopers

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Kinger's Wife is Black and her name is Queenie. She is pretty much that Nigger from Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs who transformed into a Rule 63 Kinger in chestnut wood texture along with a red (Kool-Aid) robe with white fuzzy lining that is spotted.
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4753812/
Oh no I ment in the chinese version. I know about the normal version
 
If u guys saw TADC in theater, did GLITCH showcase clips of any of their other shows? I'm shocked there hasn't been any news about Gaslight District. Seems like it would've been a good opportunity to show something.
 
I doubt it as they're desperately waiting for everyone to forget about Gaslight District cause its too niche to fuel their money machine.

1000 more Kitt statues please!
How Glitch and Rubber Dildo Ross feel after a lot of mindless goycattle fans are on their way to buy Gameoaste.cxverse all of the Gameoverse Slop from their website so they can pocket some shekels cash and see if they can fund to greenlight the entire series, all cause everyone is still crazy about that half-baked pilot.
Kike_Bodega.png
 
is there any legal definition for indie because at this point I don’t think glitch can be called indie
It sorta depends on the amount of employees, annual revenue and so on. The exact numbers of which for Glitch we don't know because they don't release stuff like that publicly. At the very least, we know they meet these conditions because the government only gives out funds to companies legally recognized as indie.

Of course, this is by legal definitions. Anyone who's not seduced by Glitch's promises of bringing about the indie renaissance or blinded by their love of cartoon clowns and edgelord mechs can see that Glitch is absolutely nothing like the average independent artist.
"Indie" is an undefined transword and it's just going to lead to endless arguing over nothing forever like if we were on 4chan.
This "undefinedness" is due to the word originally being a musicfag term like "punk" or "-core", trying to "rigidly" define it in a meme dictionary to then later wield it as a "moral bluedgon" (Moralkeule) to swing around is not going to help anybody.

Especially since this "rigid definition" is just going to reflect The Current Concern™, ergo "Indie" means "Not rich and powerful, dewd." so the word is just another communist term for libtards and trannies to throw around on twitter for a class war (against White People), that's not very fulfilling.
In the musicfag context "indie" can become this reaction against the Big Bad Music Labels but following this ideological trend will just turn you into this:
Ian_MacKaye.jpg

If a studio becomes rich and successful because they are actually producing shows that people want to watch, that's good for me, and it's how a healthy industry should work, I didn't watch The Amazing Digital Circus but I am excited that they have enough funds to produce other shows like Ongezellig: Season Two, or else.

I can explain the situation better than the word "indie", reflecting my actual concerns, but only if you reply to this longpost and tell me that you give a shit.
 
"I'll have a show with absolutely no substance whatsoever beyond references to media I remember from when I was a small millennial chungus..."
"How original."
"...in an anime ripoff artstyle, with subverted tropes, maudlin emotional drama, and lesbo goonbait."
"Daring today, aren't we?"

Flappers watches his planet explode and ross finds it hilarious.
It is hilarious, for the same reason shit like Kingdom Hearts or the Ken Penders Sonic comics are: You're expected to take the maudlin emotional drama of these ridiculous characters seriously. The whole concept is much better suited for a short series of parody cartoons. Seriously, what was wrong with this? Why did it need a lesbian furry who has realistic panic attacks? I mean, it's not amazing, but I wouldn't feel embarrassed to watch it.

YWNBAH (You Will Never Be A Hadel), Arin and Ross.
 
YWNBAH (You Will Never Be A Hadel), Arin and Ross.
my issue with gameoverse is the same as with vivziepop's shows: they're run by literal pieces of shit who fucked over other people in the past for their own gain. afaik, cooper may be a tranny weirdo who powerleveled a tad bit in his own show, but at the very least he's a relatively harmless tranny weirdo (so far...)
 
Random thought I had, but I came up with a reason as to why Glitch might go through with pushing Gaslight District as their next show besides the actually good one.

As I said, in order to be granted government funds, Glitch's annual earnings needs to be below a certain amount. If Glitch decided to have GameOverse happen after Digital Circus, they might end up earning TOO much money, and lose their support from the government, since they'd be earning more money than what the government would consider an "indie" company to earn

By having Gaslight District as their next show, they can counterbalance the profits from the Digital Circus movie and its accompanying merch sales. On the surface, it seems like the "Fair" thing to do, but in reality, they're doing it so they can continue siphoning taxpayer money.

I'm just spitballing, and I have no way to really prove that this is what they're actually doing, but if I'm right, that means that Glitch will have a cycle where every few years, we'll get a show like Digital Circus and GameOverse that has a huge merch push in between everything else
 
As I said, in order to be granted government funds, Glitch's annual earnings needs to be below a certain amount. If Glitch decided to have GameOverse happen after Digital Circus, they might end up earning TOO much money, and lose their support from the government, since they'd be earning more money than what the government would consider an "indie" company to earn

By having Gaslight District as their next show, they can counterbalance the profits from the Digital Circus movie and its accompanying merch sales. On the surface, it seems like the "Fair" thing to do, but in reality, they're doing it so they can continue siphoning taxpayer money.
I was under the impression GLITCH only got taxpayer money for their first two less popular ventures, at least that's what the TADC fans seem to want to believe to make their favourite clown show seem more indie than it might be. Would be interested in the facts on how much money they are still getting from the troon enablers in charge down under.

1780972402609.png
 
I was under the impression GLITCH only got taxpayer money for their first two less popular ventures, at least that's what the TADC fans seem to want to believe to make their favourite clown show seem more indie than it might be. Would be interested in the facts on how much money they are still getting from the troon enablers in charge down under.

Ver archivo adjunto 9119434
Huh. I decided to look it up, and it turns out, you're actually right. The only government company listed as a partner on Glitch's official website is Screen Australia.
1780977271464.png

And on Screen Australia's official website, they listed Meta Runner, Sunset Paradise and Murder Drones (No Digital Circus, no Knights, no GD, and no GameOverse)
1780977338545.png 1780977407226.png

is there any legal definition for indie because at this point I don’t think glitch can be called indie

To append the answer I gave to this question, since we still don't have access to Glitch's financial records or their employee count. Now that we know they DON'T get government grants anymore, we have no way of knowing if they still meet the legal requirements to be recognized as an independent company

But the point I made about how they have access to things that the average independent artist doesn't still stands. They're not indie in the same way the artists they claim to represent and speak for are.

And while I'm wrong about doing it for government funds, they could also be doing it as a way of rationing themselves. Taking Digital Circus' success as a way to fund a project they deem to be less profitable like Gaslight District or Knights while still maintaining that "Speak for artists" ideal, then after they get it out of the way, make their money back by doing GameOverse. The cycle rinses and repeats
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo