'Flash mob' steals $30,000 in merchandise from North Face store - Melanin : Predicted, Shock : Imagined.

'Flash mob' robbery yields $30,000 in merchandise from The North Face…

archived 7 Jul 2019 00:49:36 UTC

archive.fo

'Flash mob' steals $30,000 in merchandise from North Face store
https://6abc.com/watch/

$30,000 in North Face merchandise stolen by 'flash mob'. Watch video of the incident from July 1, 2019.




Saturday, July 6, 2019 1:50AM
PLEASANT PRAIRIE, Wisconsin -- A Wisconsin North Face store was rushed by a group of ten people who ransacked the store in what police are describing as a "flash mob."

On July 1, 2019, an estimated $30,000 in merchandise was stolen in less than 30 seconds, police told local media.

According to Kenosha News, Sgt. Aaron Schaffer of the Pleasant Prairie Police Department said the group grabbed "as much merchandise as they could carry before running to the cars and leaving the property."

No one was injured in the incident.

Police posted photos and video of the incident hoping the public could help lead them to the suspects.

Please calmly discuss race theory below.

 

[Miles Peterson]

I think that's where the "food desert" sob piece comes from. Stores don't stay open where jacking prices enough to make up for shrinkage wards customers away anyway. The mom and pops sadly go out of business and retire. The chain stores sacrifice 3 locations in the hood because their 8 locations in the suburbs make money for a lot cheaper. If inelastic demand is goods that people will buy no matter what, well, then inelastic supply is stores writing off certain neighborhoods as not worth their effort because the profit margins just aren't attractive no matter how you tweak your business model.

That's not quite what inelastic supply means (inelastic supply means that the supply provided doesn't change significantly when the price does, usually because the supply provided can't easily change and will be produced/available no matter what), but otherwise, that's correct. It's worth remembering that retail has extremely low profit margins (even giants like walmart have like a 2% profit margin), so even a relatively minor shift can push a store a under. Losing 10% of your stock to shrinkage would drive a store out of business really, really fast.

 

[TheRedChair]

And this is why stores leaves a certain area. Detroit is a damn good example on why there are no major supermarkets in the more depressed area.

 

[heathercho]

@heathercho
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ie7qnFSpE_g
If he at least upgraded to a Fedora I would respect him.

Come on, if he were black he'd get away with that bald ass head.

 

[Arcturus]

Did anyone else click on this expecting one of those mass groups that starts singing and dancing descending upon a store and ransacking it? Cause I'm just disappointed now.

 

[AltisticRight]

You'd never know it because the media won't cover it, but there's a big push by the black community to force this issue. I know this because I've met some of the guys trying to do it on the local level. They really want to address the actual problems in the community and more importantly, get them to stop blaming everyone else for their fucking problems. The issue is that a lot of the current generation come from broken homes and there's ten fucktons of people within the black community actively trying to keep that community down.

I've heard that 70% of blacks come from a single parent? Let alone the "13%, 50%" crime stats.
I for one would not want just toss out stats to claim "see, these nigs are just more criminal". The problem is way more complicated than just skin colour. Opponents will equalise for poverty and skin colour, since poor whites are less criminal than blacks in every income bracket and they do kind of have a point. I think the larger problem is with single parents and false idols. Without a father, these disenfranchised kids will look up to whatever gangsta thug nigger rapper that's popular at the moment, who raps about doing subhuman shit. I disagree that poverty is correlated with criminality.
This needs to be fixed. No amount of whitey handouts and whitey reparations will solve such an internal problem. It's something the black community must address themselves.

 

[Wraith]

Is this the black version of Crystal Night against businesses?

 

[UQ 770]

Northface is expensive, but that does not look like 30K

Yeah this was on my mind too. I suspect the store owners may be exaggerating their losses a bit for a higher insurance payout. Tell you what, I totally would. Let no bad event in your life go unexploited.

Also I liked how most of the criminals involved were all dressed with the same white shirts and grey/khaki pants combo like they're mook variants in a fighting game or something. I think to think they stood around a couple of forties beforehand and though really hard about what everyone was gonna wear, and nobody could convince Jamal to take his fucking beanie off. Only one with any sense in that pile of morons was probably the kid in the hoodie.

 

[usernames can change now!]

"nobody needs 30 rounds in a magazine"

 

[Jaimas]

I've heard that 70% of blacks come from a single parent? Let alone the "13%, 50%" crime stats.
I for one would not want just toss out stats to claim "see, these nigs are just more criminal". The problem is way more complicated than just skin colour. Opponents will equalise for poverty and skin colour, since poor whites are less criminal than blacks in every income bracket and they do kind of have a point. I think the larger problem is with single parents and false idols. Without a father, these disenfranchised kids will look up to whatever gangsta thug nigger rapper that's popular at the moment, who raps about doing subhuman shit. I disagree that poverty is correlated with criminality.
This needs to be fixed. No amount of whitey handouts and whitey reparations will solve such an internal problem. It's something the black community must address themselves.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=uWQvcUF0YeIhttps://youtube.com/watch?v=xQ19l9IXo-k

According to a friend of mine (who is doing things to address this issue), the biggest problem is that for every single person trying to correct the problem in the black community, there's three trying to keep the problem as it is and five trying to make it worse, and all of them are trying to stake their careers on it. It's a massive, multi-channel problem from top-to-bottom, with causes ranging from systemic poverty to the utter implosion of the black family unit, which is why the assholes pitching the "it's whitey's fault" and "we need more money forever" crowd have such an easy time of it - they get to pitch an easy solution they know won't work to a community that desperately needs it, and when it doesn't work, they get to claim that it's proof of the massive conspiracy to keep a brother down.

The destruction of the family unit within the black community is the source of the overpowering majority of its problems, from increasing numbers growing up in poverty to increased crime rates. All of these fucking things, fittingly, can be traced back to one fucking bit of nonsense in the 1960s.

For the uninitiated: in the 1960s it was noticed that by all accounts, the civil rights movement had been successful - blacks were integrating well and the economy was booming, but black communities were having issues. General consensus, at the time, was that it was part of an adaptive phase - that with the removal of institutional barriers from expanded employment, the black community would advance the same way the Irish and Italians had. The former especially, as the Irish had been similarly ghettoized and had to work their way out of the same problems. The problem was that they were still stalling out, and multiple investigations were launched.

Unfortunately, when government reports came out and figured out the exact problem - namely that this was happening because less black people were getting married, more black women were getting pregnant out of wedlock, and many black families were becoming more and more reliant on welfare as a consequence of the first two, it was a tacit admission that the black community had to take some responsibility. General findings at the time were that the ghettos were creating generations of children unable to seize the opportunities that the civil rights movement had opened up for them, again, similar to what had happened to the Irish.

Needless to say, this did *not* go over well with the racial identitarians of the time.

While the timing of the report wasn't good in the first place - right after the Watts Riot - groups like the NAACP and CORE went nuclear in response to this, with one writer for The Nation, William Ryan, being one of the most aggressive voices in declaring that the report was "blaming the victim." If that retort sounds familiar to you, congratulations, you now are aware that this is a meme that's been running for nearly sixty years unabated.

With that single line catching on, the entire affair immediately became a zero sum game to politicians, and with good reason: the black activist groups, rather than addressing the issue, turned around and drew a line in the sand, reframing the entire issue in such a way that you either believed that the systemic problems in the black community were due to a massive defect in the system, and thus they were innocent victims who deserved more money and nothing else, or you believed the black community's issues needed to address the problem itself and thus you were a racist. It has basically never been addressed since, while at the same time intersectionalists have claimed that the nuclear family itself was a toxic holdover of whiteness anyway.

In conclusion, racial identitarians and their intersectionalist allies are cancer, but you all already knew that.