Five Nights At Freddy's

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Destacado
If you want to know about some more "obscure" and small drama, there is a video this guy that makes sexual fnaf gmod animations for kids


So far nothing new, but man, Xman's videos are some of the most embarassing shit I've ever seen, and I have a massive stomach for cringe , seriously, just check this video where he shows clips from his content and you see what I'm talking about.
 
Última edición:
Sand Mega dijo:
If you want to know about some more "obscure" and small drama, there is a video this guy that makes sexual fnaf gmod animations for kids

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Tb8PD2uHvHQ
So far nothing new, but man, Xman's videos are some of the most embarassing shit I've ever seen, and I have a massive stomach for cringe , seriously, just check this video where he shows clips from his content and you see what I'm talking about.
Presiona para expandir...
The comment of the dude not understanding how coomers justify sexualizing an animatronic that's haunted by a dead child. Dude's overthinking it.

If it looks fuckable, lore doesn't matter, only what's on the screen because it activates the neuron. No one who jerks off to FNAF porn thinks about FNAF lore, and same goes for all Rule 34 shit.

However that one comment has nothing on xman's vids. Besides the fact that he does pornographic content for kids and YouTube doesn't do shit about it is one thing, however the vids themselves are just grating to me for two reasons:

1) his attempts at voice acting are just fucking horrendous and make my ears bleed.
2) he's using GMod, which is based off of like Half-Life 2 Source, and all the models he's using look like shit because they're completely matte as they were never meant to be used in GMod's graphical engine, and then he does something a fucking 9 year old in 2012 would do for his GMod machinimas, which is dragging the fucking ragdolls around and using the player camera as your main camera. I think 9 year olds in 2012 put it more effort than that.

To be honest, dragging model ragdolls around like that to mimic sex animations is probably just him adjusting to his viewerbase, as shown on the video below.

It's fucked to be a kid/teenager in the modern day with unrestricted Internet access.
 
Can someone confirm what is happening with this guy? Was curious but didn't want to bother researching it
(He's the creator of Day shift at Freddy's if you didn't know)

1696505484727503.jpg


Also supposedly the ozzie he's talking about is the character from Over the Hedge

Ozzie_webp.png
 
Lyra Plushie dijo:
Ver archivo adjunto 5387888Ver archivo adjunto 5387891Ver archivo adjunto 5387894
dude. therapy. now.
Ver archivo adjunto 5387921
can't find an archive of the picture but here's some replies.
Presiona para expandir...
Jesus Christ, I didn't know it was on this level, I think this could even be posted in some random furfag thread, I guess he must have forgotten the meds for 5 days straight. There really is no limits to parasocial relationships when you can even get obsessed with a cgi possum from a movie that's 17 years old. The sad part is that things like this are already common place now.

Also some new for the movie:

New posters appeared in Rotten Tomatoes that are just the original ones but with no red eyes

F7Dy7B9bYAAttmb.jpg



Also the movie is rumored to have already made it's budget back from selling it to cinemas

1696539615413.jpeg


You can also see the box office predictions that movie is gonna make it's budget back regardless

net.png
werfwerf.png


Source: https://www.boxofficepro.com/long-range-box-office-forecast-five-nights-at-freddys/ https://archive.is/coTLx

All that I'm saying is that if this turns out to be true you can completely expect a sequel
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • 1696539807550.png
    1696539807550.png
    15.7 KB · Vistas: 23
Última edición:
Sand Mega dijo:
All that I'm saying is that if this turns out to be true you can completely expect a sequel
Presiona para expandir...
Was thinking about that the other day. No way this isn't gonna be a huge success in respects to its budget. I just hope Scott doesn't take nearly ten years to create the sequel. Speaking of which, I think it's funny, if frustrating, how he took so long to be satisfied with the script only to go with the most obvious plotline. A guy takes a job as a security guard and tries to unravel the mysteries of the establishment. Like no fucking shit that was the best move.
 
Sand Mega dijo:
Can someone confirm what is happening with this guy? Was curious but didn't want to bother researching it
(He's the creator of Day shift at Freddy's if you didn't know)

Ver archivo adjunto 5387856

Also supposedly the ozzie he's talking about is the character from Over the Hedge

Ver archivo adjunto 5387869
Presiona para expandir...
THIS is DirectDoggo now? Did he fuck himself up on crystal meth after Dayshift or something? This dude's talking like his frontal lobe is hanging by a thread.
 
AbduluCthuluZulu dijo:
THIS is DirectDoggo now?
Presiona para expandir...

An update about the guy with the Ozzy fetish, apparently he isn't the creator the creator of dayshift at freddy's I just confused him with another fangame creator with a very similar name

https://gamejolt.com/@DirectDogman https://gamejolt.com/@DoctorDoggo https://twitter.com/DirectDoggo

I'm sorry I guess I should have checked before saying it was him I had a bit of a mandela effect and was sure it was him, apologies for spreading misinformation

As for the actual dsaf creator, he seems to be a sane individual and not a lunatic

As for the actual Ozzy guy, he already sent his goodbyes on social media and it looks like he will indeed go to the psych yard

Permeant Leave Thank you all so much.png


https://gamejolt.com/p/permeant-leave-thank-you-all-so-much-ujv8bqw5 https://archive.is/TRHfQ

Goodbye. I'll miss you all so much.png


https://gamejolt.com/p/goodbye-i-ll-miss-you-all-so-much-3cf5bctr This post probably means that it is indeed over

There is a probable chance that this is some sort of internet stunt for attention, but I wouldn't make myself look like a complete deranged mentally unwell individual who is gonna be locked up in a psych ward just to get internet sympathy points, specially if the cause of my supposed episode is a cartoon character

This could also be some elaborate form of trolling, but this individual doesn't seem like the kind to do something like it, and lying about self harming for a joke would probably destroy his career anyway
 
Three years? Really? Involuntary hospitalization and the like is a little outside my wheel house, but I don't recall ever seeing someone get put into psychiatric inpatient treatment for three years without some kind of contracted court case determining their inability to care for themselves. Either this guy is off-kilter enough to confuse 72-hour holds for 3 year holds, or this is just the latest entry in a long string of court ordered intervention.
 
Lone Star dijo:
Was thinking about that the other day. No way this isn't gonna be a huge success in respects to its budget. I just hope Scott doesn't take nearly ten years to create the sequel. Speaking of which, I think it's funny, if frustrating, how he took so long to be satisfied with the script only to go with the most obvious plotline. A guy takes a job as a security guard and tries to unravel the mysteries of the establishment. Like no fucking shit that was the best move.
Presiona para expandir...

The issue is that from the trailers, it seems to be another shitty horror blumhouse movie. Even with Scott's supervision, I don't think even he could have tard wrangled the studio that much. Also, Scott was never a storyteller, other people practically made the story of fnaf for him.
 
I'm kind of impressed they sat on the FNAF movie for so long that two copycats came out first, and it's looking like the real product is going to not only stick to the source material & mechanics thematically, but probably avoid the mistakes the copycats made. Good for them. Cautiously optimistic to see this in theaters with friends, and none of us have played the games or are existing fans.
 
new unlisted video came out on universal pictures channel. Someone tipped off the theorist Fuhnaff to it.

it's a 10 minute video with several screens showing clips of the movie and many easter eggs. a lot of interesting stuff hidden in the video too like morse code, quick imagery, and more.

Unable to archive video or download it. probably cause it's unlisted?
 
GenociderSyo dijo:
MatPat did an entire "theory" video about people giving him shit about his theories.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ILFfj2zYwHY
Presiona para expandir...
Is it okay if I repeat what I said in the Matpat thread?

At first he tries to argue that theorists literally think differently from most people and thus he's seeing stuff his critics aren't (forgot to mention in the Matpat thread proper, but is anyone else bothered by how Matpat still acts like he comes up with his own theories when its well known by now that he has writers?)

Then he argues people aren't actually listening to his theories but just boiling them all down to one meme image--IE the haters are all hating a strawman (with an implication that they're too stupid to understand everything he said).

Then he calls his critics hypocrites. "You hate me for bringing up the teeth, but then you bring up the claws. How is that better?" (Not an exact quote but who cares).

Then he says "actually a lot of times I turned out to be right" mentioning a couple of his hits.

The whole video, by the way, he also tries to act like he's defending not just himself but all FNAF theorists, bringing up that FuhNaff and RyeToast also got some criticism, and Matpat pulls the whole "this negativity hurts TEH COMMUNITY!" jazz. This is where I mentally checked out and went to play some Shinobi.

An additional thought I posted there and might as well repeat here:

I wonder if all these critics don't so much hate the individual FNAF theories as much as they hate that "FNAF theorizing" is even still a thing in the face of how increasingly obvious it is that the franchise is make-it-up-as-you-go and as such is basically an exercise in Quixotic timewasting.

FNAF Theorizing reminds me of the worst of Batman fans who insist that all these villains and plot points were designed with deep thematic elements in mind ("Two-Face is just like Batman because he's also got two sides to his personality!") when really no, anyone can read the damn comics and see they never had those kind of ambitions (or pretensions, whatever you want to call them) and even the authors will tell you "no we created him because horror comics were popular at the time so we wanted a horror character."
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo