But why can't this be discussed at all, just because it's a minority of cases?
Again, not what I said.
Yes, it is fairly rare, ~10% or less, but that is a large part of why it is being discussed, it is rare, and thus, novel.
The thrust of this thread is the opposite of that: that it is supposedly not rare and not novel, and to highlight how evil and coddled women are (nevermind that the first 12 pages show women being punished).
Many have hopped on to argue that no one cares about boys*, even though some of the victims of the posted perpetrators were girls AND that the perpetrators of sex crimes against boys are very very often men (and far greater, by volume).
*which was the stated purpose of OP's prior thread (linked below), after which they stated they would create a separate, related thread - and again, it is a thread that focuses only on female perpetrators, despite a lot of talk about caring about the boys.
The threads are disingenuous because OP wraps a soft blanket of "care about boys," when the real purpose is"women are monsters"; if the point was the boy victims of sexual crimes, there wouldn't be just women shown for a dozen pages, and if the OP cared about child victims of women in general, they'd not have spoken in their narrative only about boy victims. Instead they spoke about women/ boys but as support for it included female perpetrators against girls, and wholly ignored boy victims of men.
Present said harder-edged comment, because I've yet to find it and it'd make this go a lot faster if I knew what OP said that made him out to be an ubermisogynist who wants to make all women out to be rapists lurking behind every blade of grass.
This is the comment wherein OP indicates the future thread. In context, it is from another of OP'S threads lamenting apathy toward boys.
[edit - preview looks like it's going to the OP of that thread, which is relevant and below but the post (two, actually) is on the 4th page.
So from that thread - ostensibly about supposed apathy toward boys (victims) but pointed specifically toward women - OP created this thread, not about boy victims but about casting women, specifically, as particularly evil perpetrators of sexual crimes.
Prior thread OP:
The
reality is that 90% of offenders (i.e., men) offend against female child and adolescent victims disproportionately, whereas 10% of offenders (i.e., women) offend against children of both genders about equally, offend violently against adolescent victims close to equally, and offend non-violently (incest, statutory) more against adolescent boys than girls.
Male sexual assault perpetrators offend against child victims about 25% of the time and predominantly choose female child victims, whereas female perpetrators offend against child victims about 40% of the time and choose child victims of both genders equally. Male perpetrators offend against adolescent victims about 40% of the time, and once again tend to choose female adolescent victims. Female perpetrators offend against adolescent victims a comparable amount of time (about 45%), and for forcible offenses (rape, sodomy, sexual assault with an object, and forcible fondling) choose adolescent victims of both genders equally, while for non-forcible offenses (non-forcible incest and statutory rape) they tend to choose predominantly male victims.
x 9 
