Fantasy fiction is a psyop

[Grub]

I mean, if you're not trying to convince people of your theory, why post a thread on it and write multiple essays trying to justify your belief in magic? To be honest I don't really care either way if such a thing as magic exists because if it does it doesn't seem to noticeably affect the world so it doesn't matter.

 

[teriyakiburns]

K/r reproduction can be applied to humans.

No, it can't. humans are biologically incapable of r-type reproduction. A human birthing more than two offspring at a time is an extreme rarity and a human child is incapable of caring for itself for several years post-birth. R-type reproduction would mean humans that routinely shit out a dozen babies with each pregnancy, who can then almost immediately run off to forage for food.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

I love how this schizophrenic rambling about magic being real and fantasy fiction being a psyop to hide it includes calling God "your magical best friend in the sky". People will believe in anything as long as it's not God

 

[skykiii]

R-type reproduction

I love how this schizophrenic rambling about magic being real and fantasy fiction being a psyop to hide it includes calling God "your magical best friend in the sky". People will believe in anything as long as it's not God

Not sure what you're on about. God is definitely real.

God is also kind of part of this topic as that's another thing where I think a lot of people's ideas are formed more by fiction (and general human stupidity) than anything else, and it gets people stuck in reductive traps that end up limiting them.

To use an example you'll like: I often see atheists say "if God is real, he must be evil because he creates people then demands worship or else he will punish them." Putting aside for a moment that absolutely none of this is actually true in a Biblical sense... the sheer nonsensality of this scenario should clue people in to that something is wrong, and yet because we've had decades of media like the Populous games (where a god's power is directly linked to their amount of followers) that a lot of people believe it without question.

I mean, if you're not trying to convince people of your theory, why post a thread on it and write multiple essays trying to justify your belief in magic?

To get it out of my head to make space for other things.

Also its not just about belief in magic, its about breaking certain thought patterns. Feels like most people have been limiting themselves because they're erroneously caught in "things must work this way!" traps when a lot of times, no matter what the thing in question is... no, it absolutely doesn't need to work like that.

 

[Male Idiot]

No, it can't. humans are biologically incapable of r-type reproduction. A human birthing more than two offspring at a time is an extreme rarity and a human child is incapable of caring for itself for several years post-birth. R-type reproduction would mean humans that routinely shit out a dozen babies with each pregnancy, who can then almost immediately run off to forage for food.

It can be comparatively made between human subpsecies.

You are being retarded on purpose.

Dogs in general have a more r-type reproduction THAN humans. But some dog species grow up faster and have bigger litters.

Same for pigs. This does not mean a pig breed can reproduce faster than mice, but it can be faster than other pigs.

Niggers and Indians reach sexual maturity a few years earlier and reproduce earlier. They don't have more offspring per year, but develop i to sexual maturity a good 3-6 years earlier than whites or yellows.

The why to this evolutionary adaptation is perhaps due to winter food shortages.

This is why "15 year old urban youth killed cop" gets you a 6 feet tall gorilla nigger.

 

[Froggy Fresh Sextape]

blah blah blah r-type

counterpoint:

 

[teriyakiburns]

It can be comparatively made between human subpsecies.

No, it can't. Homonidae, which includes apes, monkeys, Indians, and Africans, are all k-type selected. It's not a comparative thing; homonidae have to invest several years raising offspring before they can live an independent life. Laziness doesn't change that. Serial pregnancy doesn't count, nor does trayvon the 13 year-old gorilla nigger bouncing your head on the pavement, which is just a sign of low intelligence rather than reproductive strategies (his for obvious reasons, yours for letting him get within striking distance). Trying to squeeze homo into an r-type reproductive box is the sort of retarded thinking I'd expect from a groyper.

Impressive. Very nice.

Let's see final type's cart.

 

[Male Idiot]

No, it can't. Homonidae, which includes apes, monkeys, Indians, and Africans, are all k-type selected. It's not a comparative thing; homonidae have to invest several years raising offspring before they can live an independent life. Laziness doesn't change that. Serial pregnancy doesn't count, nor does trayvon the 13 year-old gorilla nigger bouncing your head on the pavement, which is just a sign of low intelligence rather than reproductive strategies (his for obvious reasons, yours for letting him get within striking distance). Trying to squeeze homo into an r-type reproductive box is the sort of retarded thinking I'd expect from a groyper.


Impressive. Very nice.

Let's see final type's cart.

Then what is your explanation as to why darkies grow up faster? Why no 15 year old white or asian kid looks like a fully grown rugby player? How come gypsies shit out gyplets by age 10 with little complications one would expect in a barely even teenage pregnancy?

I know whites historically had larger families, but they started later, do I need to get BP in here as to how 13 year old middle age tradwife weren't really common?
Gypsies and nogs get at least a 5 years head start on reproduction.

You are strawmanning me as if I said niggers lay 20 nigger eggs every week. Yet they do reproduce from a much earlier age than cold adapted variants, lets say subspecies of hominids.

Explain it how they do it with much less complications so regularly.

 

[skykiii]

Impressive. Very nice.

Let's see final type's cart.

R-Type Final came on a disc, actually, but here ya go.

Incidently thanks to you I wound up reviving this thread.

.............

Hate that this topic became another bullshit Eugenics thread. It's like Deep Thoughts posters are too retarded to understand anything that's not about Jews or Black people. I swear a lot of Deep Thoughts users come off like they're projecting hard when they talk about "niggers" not being able to conceptualize this or that, when they themselves repeatedly show the exact same cognitive failing.

 

[Male Idiot]

I am still waiting for an alternatice theory that explains the phenomenon.

 

[Smoltine Kiminal]

Op is a fucking retard, magic always comes at a cost
it just be like dat

also op uses "they" when referring to a singular person, indicating that his brain was permanently fried by propaganda

when politicians cite stories from harry potter and superhero movies

>its just like in the movies
yes, but claiming that all fiction is like that is stupid, it obviously depends on the objective and S O V L of the author

Like the other day when I was getting lottery tickets, someone asked "why do you think you deserve to win?"

>he doesnt know the lottery is fixed
lol, lmao

While you play DnD or pray or watch sportsball, you aren't noticing (((them))) importing infinite browns.

>his plot does not involve a wizard crossbreeding orcs with hill-men & brainwash the half-orc children from birth with ritual torture to use them as soldiers & cheap workforce

It can be comparatively made between human subpsecies.

the difference is mostly cultural tho, white working class mothers shat out 10 children or more just 100 years ago
part of the parenting was done not by the parents themselves, but by their family, the older children helped, the grandparents helped, and uncles / aunts helped as well when needed.
niggers and shitskins in general still have this more natual family structure, while the nuclear family was pushed on the white world as a ploy to weaken the family and thus profit the state.
on the other hand the single mother with 3 baby daddies doesnt exist in african cultures at all, they have marriages just like whites have, the single mother is the result of the state replacing the function of the family, again to weaken familial structures

 

[Smoltine Kiminal]

I am still waiting for an alternatice theory that explains the phenomenon.

gypsies are an anomaly, they seem to be the only humanoid culture which naturally developed that accepts rape between siblings as reasonable, doesnt enforce marriage and so on
do gypsies take care of their parents?

now to the point
your hormonal balance depends on your environment, the most extreme examples in the animal kingdom include stuff like frogs changing their sex or a bee morphing into queen-bees when no other queen-bee is there to suppress those hormones with their pheromones
in humans things like food, stress and lifestyle in general will influence your hormonal balance, of course theres shit like hormones in the water & birth control pills now too. generally it is to be expected that kids growing up in a very stressfull environment mature earlier. while some races are clearly more hairy then others turks/greeks vs asians for instance
of course some races have a different natural hormonal level too (asians have less T, niggers have more E)
then testosterone is under attack by (((the usual suspects))), a european boy of 14 from 100 years ago would look more like a man than a 14 year old boy today

genetic differences between the races do exist, and childbearing age being fully independent of these is unrealistic, but to claim that any human race is based on r-type reproduction is a stretch, all natural human cultures ever (excepts gypsies apparently, lol) invest a great amount of labor into their children, even over a decade after birth, more than every other known species
with a slightly different culture whites could (and did up until very recently) outbreed every other race, thus the cultural factor holds far greater weight than the genetic difference

 

[Male Idiot]

gypsies are an anomaly, they seem to be the only humanoid culture which naturally developed that accepts rape between siblings as reasonable, doesnt enforce marriage and so on
do gypsies take care of their parents?

now to the point
your hormonal balance depends on your environment, the most extreme examples in the animal kingdom include stuff like frogs changing their sex or a bee morphing into queen-bees when no other queen-bee is there to suppress those hormones with their pheromones
in humans things like food, stress and lifestyle in general will influence your hormonal balance, of course theres shit like hormones in the water & birth control pills now too. generally it is to be expected that kids growing up in a very stressfull environment mature earlier. while some races are clearly more hairy then others turks/greeks vs asians for instance
of course some races have a different natural hormonal level too (asians have less T, niggers have more E)
then testosterone is under attack by (((the usual suspects))), a european boy of 14 from 100 years ago would look more like a man than a 14 year old boy today

genetic differences between the races do exist, and childbearing age being fully independent of these is unrealistic, but to claim that any human race is based on r-type reproduction is a stretch, all natural human cultures ever (excepts gypsies apparently, lol) invest a great amount of labor into their children, even over a decade after birth, more than every other known species
with a slightly different culture whites could (and did up until very recently) outbreed every other race, thus the cultural factor holds far greater weight than the genetic difference

Now that is a better reply.

I did say whites used to get more children and I said they just started later.

This would mirror pale winter adapted yellows like Chinks or Japs.

Perhaps the genetic predisposition for longer growth period was due to winters as well.

This is simply selective pressures.

A white or japanese village may had less predation but more seasonal stresses.

While a negro or gypsy/jeet had more abundant food, but was even more likely to die early so growing up faster was selected for.

This however does not need to strictly collerate with IQ.
Latin Americans grow up faster, but were very capable of making complex societies like Aztecs or Mayans or Incans.

Gypsies are pretty much the uncivilised, ungoverned, wild form of pajeets.

So they had not even have the latticework of Hinduism and brahmins to form them into a... semi functional, if shitty, pun intended, society.

 

[skykiii]

also op uses "they" when referring to a singular person, indicating that his brain was permanently fried by propaganda

Except that singular they is not a thing that started because of modern gender stuff, fucking moron. It's quite common if either A) you don't know the gender of the person or B) don't want to reveal it (mystery novels--even old ones like Agatha Christie--do this a lot, and even make "everyone assumed it was a man because people said He" a plot point. But you're not exactly Hercule Poirot now, are you?)

 

[DeadwastePrime]

real

 

[Smoltine Kiminal]

I said they just started later

to be honest im not sure if they really started later or not
i know for a fact that some noble marriages where held as soon as the first blood, while other times nobles waited for a suitable candidate
but ive heard both claims that normal people tended to marry young, so around 13-16, and other claims that normal people used to marry mostly after 18
i tend to be more skeptical of the claim that marriage happend mostly after 18, and earlier marriage was frowned upon, mostly because the age is arbitrary and was chosen just a hundred years ago, and specifically in the united states, which has very strict laws in this regard to this day, while europe generally has no legal precedent against relationships with 16 year olds at all, in some cases going as low as 13
ive also heard the claim that menses tended to start later a hundred years ago, and i tend to somewhat believe that, because the food situation at that time was horrible from war torn industrialized countries without a low-tech agricultural base that could support the population. and of course all the chemicals we are exposed to now can play a role too
i do however doubt that menses tended to start as late as 18 (again that magical number was claimed), i think the difference might realistically be one or two years, so girls starting menses with 13 or 14 instead of 11 or 12

if you have any trustworthy sources on the matter id be happy to read them

Except that singular they is not a thing that started because of modern gender stuff

yes it was, ive heard all those stupid premade arguments about muh 13 century theym too, just shut up

even make "everyone assumed it was a man because people said He" a plot point.

this is just bad writing.

btw are you vaxxinated?

 

[skykiii]

this is just bad writing.

Oh okay, even though it would include plenty of luminaries of the genre, sure, some tard on a forum says its bad so they must all be dumb. Couldn't possibly be you, the guy who types like a cat randomly walked across your keyboard, who is in the wrong.

And no I'm not vaxxed.

 

[Male Idiot]

Except that singular they is not a thing that started because of modern gender stuff, fucking moron. It's quite common if either A) you don't know the gender of the person or B) don't want to reveal it (mystery novels--even old ones like Agatha Christie--do this a lot, and even make "everyone assumed it was a man because people said He" a plot point. But you're not exactly Hercule Poirot now, are you?)

It is still retarded. Anglospeak should have 6 pronouns at least.

Now it is on its way to have 4, 3 with royal We.

I, you, them, we, you, them. Retarded.

to be honest im not sure if they really started later or not
i know for a fact that some noble marriages where held as soon as the first blood, while other times nobles waited for a suitable candidate
but ive heard both claims that normal people tended to marry young, so around 13-16, and other claims that normal people used to marry mostly after 18
i tend to be more skeptical of the claim that marriage happend mostly after 18, and earlier marriage was frowned upon, mostly because the age is arbitrary and was chosen just a hundred years ago, and specifically in the united states, which has very strict laws in this regard to this day, while europe generally has no legal precedent against relationships with 16 year olds at all, in some cases going as low as 13
ive also heard the claim that menses tended to start later a hundred years ago, and i tend to somewhat believe that, because the food situation at that time was horrible from war torn industrialized countries without a low-tech agricultural base that could support the population. and of course all the chemicals we are exposed to now can play a role too
i do however doubt that menses tended to start as late as 18 (again that magical number was claimed), i think the difference might realistically be one or two years, so girls starting menses with 13 or 14 instead of 11 or 12

if you have any trustworthy sources on the matter id be happy to read them


yes it was, ive heard all those stupid premade arguments about muh 13 century theym too, just shut up

this is just bad writing.

btw are you vaxxinated?

I am not talking about marriage. I talked about giving healthy offspring.

Gypsies can easily do it at 10-12. Middle age whites marrying at 15 is still 4 years of growth later.

 

[Smoltine Kiminal]

Oh okay, even though it would include plenty of luminaries of the genre, sure, some tard on a forum says its bad so they must all be dumb.

either:

>author deliberately misrepresents whats happening in story
can work if the book is about fucking your state of mind ala kafka, but is INCREDIBLY shitty in a detective roman

or:

>hurr durr the witness said "he was running away"
>even tho the witness knew it was a woman
sidenote: trannies and "allies" often use "they" even tho they full well know that its either a man or a woman that is discussed, and everyone else as well, showing they are themselves confused as to when they should use normal pronouns, and when to force themselves to write artificial shit

or:

>detective is a retard who made assumption without asking for body figure
>which the author explains is because of the generic masculinum
>which is just the author forcing her deranged tranny speech into her fanfiction, making it a plot point even tho a believable detective wouldnt make that assumption, as he uses generic masculinum in his speech every day (detectives are very logical humans, they have to be)
a believable detective might just assume the murderer is a male due to sexism, or the method used (women dont tend to use brute force with blunt objects), this could make a good plot point

all of which are horrible writing

I, you, them, we, you, them. Retarded.

I am | you are | he/she/it is
we are | you are | they are
i count 7 pronouns

Gypsies can easily do it at 10-12

thats around the age that menses starts in white girls too

 

[chalkyresidue]

Lately, I have thought about it and noticed that most fantasy media--whether its novels, anime, film, games, images formed out of tea leaves, ants performing interpretive dance, etc.--tend to have a couple of recurring themes.

One day I hope to write a novel with an opening line as good as this one.