Despite sexual immorality being an issue, there clearly is an odd hyperfixation on sex. One of my last posts from another thread about calling Moscow a modern day Sodom despite the alphabet soup getting forcefully erased nation-wide and "trad family" being glorified wasn't a joke. Also I actually really despise the word "sodomite" as an euphemism for men who have anal sex. It perverts the whole story from the Bible which I'm growing to love every time I come back to it, and I'm not ignoring here the fact that this activity was
a part of why Sodom was destroyed. The key word, "a part," and context/scale matter too, the city wasn't destroyed because some random guy quietly fucked another guy. All this term did was to make secular people believe that Christianity teaches that any homosexual activity specifically is what automatically triggers meteor showers for no coherent reason whatsoever.
This sort of fixation is also one of reasons why perversion is getting fueled due to the pendulum effect. That's a whole other story, but in short, the basic rule of psychology of any fetish is that it's inherently fueled by shame, taboo, and sense of victimhood. Plenty of gay/trans coming out stories feature some kind of rabid "conservative" background and that's for a reason that many still try to ignore.
I think this hyperfocus on sex is likely a comfortable yet hypocritical state of denial for many people, after all, in a way, sexual sins can be very easy to control or be hidden to create an illusion of a "righeous" society. Imo, looking closely at people reveals that for every excuse for sexual immorality among liberals, there's a dozen, if not a hundred, excuses for assorted sins coming from "traditionalists". Since I mentioned Moscow, I just recalled this
stupid catchphrase that a lot of "traditionalists" love to come back to, as a marker of a "perfect", "righteous" society. I don't think I need to explain why this idea is painfully hypocritical in the context of USSR realities and how they fall into spiritual warfare. Performative anti-sexuality is worth nothing, especially when you're building a society based on ideology that promotes putting human understanding before God altogether and for saying you believe in Jesus you'll get executed or put in an asylum where you'll get tortured.
Maybe that's by design. Sexual immorality is never a cause, but a fruit of the spirit. Maybe nobody wants to talk about it, because at the core it's pride and lust. If you frame it that way, then the heterosexual majority will inevitably fall under this. If you actually start talking about sin, it will quickly expose that most people commited more non-sexual sins than sexual. People don't want to hear this. Satan can't have that either, because this logically should lead to mass awakening that we need a savior.
