Disaster E. Jean Carroll claims Trump raped her - Here we go again

https://www.latimes.com/nation/nati...html?outputType=amp&__twitter_impression=true

A veteran New York lifestyle journalist in a first-person essay published Friday says Donald Trump raped her in a dressing room at a ritzy Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s — one of the most serious accusations of sexual assault ever lobbed against the president.

E. Jean Carroll, best known for hosting a namesake talk show on NBC between 1994 and 1996, made the claim in New York magazine.
Carroll, now 75, said the rape took place in the fall of 1995 or spring 1996 while she was shopping at Bergdorf Goodman.

Trump — who has been accused of sexual misconduct by at least 19 women and has himself bragged on tape about his proclivity for grabbing women’s genitals — vehemently denied Carroll’s allegation via a White House spokesman.


“This is a completely false and unrealistic story surfacing 25 years after allegedly taking place and was created simply to make the president look bad,” the spokesman said.

 

[Munchingonfish]

Even if she wasn't physically raped, billions of LGBT and BAME youth were raped metaphorically by Trump on 11/9.

He must be charged.

 

[The Last Stand]

Bitch, if you can't remember better than that, it didn't happen, at least now how you're trying to sell it.

To be fair, she is 75. Or was it 76? Maybe it's a typo.

 

[MuuMuu Bunnylips]

"We haven't found a way to get him impeached yet. Time to break out #metoo!"

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

Is there a police report, camera footage, eyewitness accounts of the actual event? Anything? Or is this the same #MeToo story as always that we see more and more of.
The rub is that the more this happens, the less people will take the real shit seriously. One side wants to believe because "Fuck Trump" and "Why would she lie?" And the other side wants proof because it would otherwise set a terrible precedent of guilty before proven innocent, even more than we see now. It's a lose-lose debate. Either you open up more false cases ruining people, or you cast shade on actual victims out of necessity. From a legal standpoint, anyway. Public opinion will usually go to whatever suits the current trend.

 

[mr.moon1488]

Not just about this case, but the whole #Metoo shit makes me think that US law should be changed to where if you're convicted of falsely accusing anyone of a crime, you get what their maximum sentence would have been.

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

Not just about this case, but the whole #Metoo shit makes me think that US law should be changed to where if you're convicted of falsely accusing anyone of a crime, you get what their maximum sentence would have been.

That could be very risky. If you were victimized, you may be afraid to come forward. For the same reasons innocents are jailed and guilty walk free, it would raise the risk for the actual victims. If the system was airtight and everything worked perfectly like it should, then maybe, but that would bring to much risk as of now. And that's the rub, there's no easy solution that wouldn't harm innocents as well. And that's what really sucks about it.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

That could be very risky. If you were victimized, you may be afraid to come forward. For the same reasons innocents are jailed and guilty walk free, it would raise the risk for the actual victims. If the system was airtight and everything worked perfectly like it should, then maybe, but that would bring to much risk as of now. And that's the rub, there's no easy solution that wouldn't harm innocents as well. And that's what really sucks about it.

Bruh

He said it would be for people CONVICTED to a false accusation.

Convictions already require the jury/judge to basically believe there's no possible way they didn't do it. Granted, they don't always do their job correctly, but still.

So this isn't just, you lost in court, go to jail. It's you lost, were then investigated for making false claims (let's say, if they can prove you willingly fabricated it), and then you lose your own trial.

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

Bruh

He said it would be for people CONVICTED to a false accusation.

Convictions already require the jury/judge to basically believe there's no possible way they didn't do it. Granted, they don't always do their job correctly, but still.

So this isn't just, you lost in court, go to jail. It's you lost, were then investigated for making false claims (let's say, if they can prove you willingly fabricated it), and then you lose your own trial.

Fair enough, but my point is that there would still be room for error, and that alone may deter people from seeking justice.

 

[V0dka]

It could have happened or not, it isn't going to matter to voters. If anyone gave a shit about this they would have shown it after the access hollywood tape.

Like when he said "When you're famous, you can get away with anything, even grab a women by the pussy"?

Emmy Awards 2011

An onlooker said "Paul seemed totally not into the joke" and "Eva kept laughing nervously" when Rosario did the improvised joke. In the meantime, Rosario seemingly enjoyed it, saying "It wasn't bad. It was actually a pretty good package. I've kind of been curious since I was a teenager watching 'Clueless'. Women should get to cop a feel, too."

Looks like Trump wasn't lying after all.

 

[thx1138]

I ACCUSE GOODY TRUMPWIFE OF TURNING ME INTO A RAPE VICTIM!

Seriously though who thinks the guy who landed a full on porn star and turned her in to the First Lady of the United States has ever, ever had any interest in putting it in this fucked up old dangerhair Frances Sternhagen looking clown?

This worked so, so, so well multiple times over in the short space of three years, please histrionic bitches keep it up, it absolutely won't backfire and result in even more Trump votes.

 

[Deven]

Is anybody else shocked that only 19 women have accused him of something? There are literally millions of women in the US that hate him with the force of a thousand suns, and have every emotional, political and financial incentive to accuse him. I think the potential of angry boomer Facebook death threats is the only thing keeping the number of accusers from ballooning to triple digits+.

 

[bippu_as_fuck_ls400]

Hmm... What did she mean by this tweet last year?

https://twitter.com/ejeancarroll/status/1013134251867459585 (http://archive.fo/KlPDN)

 

[TowinKarz]

"Don't ask why I did not seek justice through conventional means and sat on it for years, as well as his rise to TV stardom, then as a candidate, then the whole campaign trail AND 3/4ths of one complete term of Presidency before speaking up. Doing so means you're just WASTING EVERYONE'S TIME"

 

[It's HK-47]

Oh am I ever glad that they gave this woman a front-page platform before even bothering to peek behind the curtain. This woman is absolutely bat-shit insane and I sincerely hope that they keep parading her out without realizing that.

 

[TowinKarz]

It's funny how even as the lawsuits pile up and the clickbait farms die off, the leftist media still doesn't understand the simple idea of "Fact checking".

They continue to believe the truthfulness of any statement is how much it advances their agenda IF true, not if it can be verified as fact.

 

[CheezzyMach]

Oh am I ever glad that they gave this woman a front-page platform before even bothering to peek behind the curtain. This woman is absolutely bat-shit insane and I sincerely hope that they keep parading her out without realizing that.

Ver archivo adjunto 810902Ver archivo adjunto 810903Ver archivo adjunto 810904Ver archivo adjunto 810905Ver archivo adjunto 810906

...And once again the Left takes a shotgun to it's feet by endorsing a crazy attention whore in a desperate attempt to own their enemy of the month.

 

[qu_rahn]

It's the beginning of the end for Blonald Blumpf

 

[whatever I feel like]

I am very surprised by this revelation. Can they go even lower than grab by the pussy?

STAY TUNED.

Foot fetishist?

 

[Belligerent Monk]

I want ro be able to say that I understand the enemy. That their predictable tactics have predictable motivations with predictable results.

But golly gee if my almonds aren't activating in serious overtime here.

This "happened" what? 20 years ago give or take?
And while I know the timing of this is predictable since Trump is gearing up for a reelection bid what absolutely dumbfounds me is why this didn't come out in 2016 to go hand in hand with the outrage over "grab em by the pussy."
You know, back when the media, the reporters, and every blue checkmark on the fucking planet was looking for anytning and everything they could get their hands on to try and crucify this guy.

At thia point I think what really irks me is the smugness of the left while having absolutely no tactical mentality unless its used to court the minority vote.

Trump was right about one thing for sure... I really am getting tired of all this winning. We need worthier opponents.

 

[heathercho]

Oh am I ever glad that they gave this woman a front-page platform before even bothering to peek behind the curtain. This woman is absolutely bat-shit insane and I sincerely hope that they keep parading her out without realizing that.

Ver archivo adjunto 810902Ver archivo adjunto 810903Ver archivo adjunto 810904Ver archivo adjunto 810905Ver archivo adjunto 810906

So her rapist is president and he's known for saying "grab them by the pussy" and he RAPED you, this rapist president... so you wear a t-shirt taking a jab at something your rapist said, in a sexually degrading way... as a way to mock his political campaign.

And he raped you....