Vriljami
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 7 de Abr, 2025
Brainrot is actually islamophobic and problematic. Thanks for the info.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Well it is already problematic.
Brainrot is actually islamophobic and problematic. Thanks for the info.
The goal is to maintain the consensus, as they've said before. Wikipedia is propaganda in its purest form, crowdsourced to wealthy out-of-touch "intellectuals" (sheltered opinionated arts graduates), oftsn citing journalists' bad interpretations of badly executed scientific papers, or even just opinion pieces. Ite the Ministry of Truth.Berkeley Students Make 300,000 Wikipedia Edits to Preserve Queer History Against Trump - Their work has already racked up nearly 100 million views.
Article Link
Archive
This sort of blatant manipulation and astroturfing is perfectly fine with Wikipedia because it comes from the right people. If half a dozen people coordinated to add info on something not kosher though it would be a conspiracy against all that is good.
The British countryside will be made into a less “white environment” under nationwide diversity plans.
Of course, I already mentioned it before, but decided to get the screencaps. Epstein didn't kill himself, conspiracy? Depends on whether the democrats like it.which claims that is a "conspiracy theory" because of course it does
Ver archivo adjunto 8506771
one of these things is not like the other
If you want to add to the fun, look up the “Transgender Genocide” article. No claims of it being a conspiracy theory, no effort of refutation, it practically says that not being able to give kids bottom surgery is the same as the Holocaust. Biggest reason I refuse to give Wikipedo a dime.If you search for "white replacement", the first result will likely be Wikipedia, which claims that is a "conspiracy theory" because of course it does. Despite this article:
Wikipedia: [loony leftist drivel despite neutral POV claim]Biggest reason I refuse to give Wikipedo a dime.
Is the profile pic of a woman still the chinese tranny that looks like Elliot William Fong?I realized that Wikipedia was completely broken when I went to the “woman” page. It doesn’t take many sentences before the tranny aspects are mentioned, and of course the site cannot define a woman by what a woman objectively/factually is.
Why do they want my white money? Shouldn't they try to be better people and seek funding from a more diverse variety of sources?also Wikipedia: "Knowledge is human, please give us money."
YesIs the profile pic of a woman still the chinese tranny that looks like Elliot William Fong?
Or the Black Genocide one.If you want to add to the fun, look up the “Transgender Genocide” article.