Dumb Shit on Wikipedia / Wikimedia Contributor General

List of people known for wearing mohawks:
- Singer
- Singer
- Shitty President
- Singer
- Singer
- Singer
- More singers and some other people, none of them presidents of xyz country.
mohawks.png
 
Berkeley Students Make 300,000 Wikipedia Edits to Preserve Queer History Against Trump - Their work has already racked up nearly 100 million views.

Article Link

Archive

This sort of blatant manipulation and astroturfing is perfectly fine with Wikipedia because it comes from the right people. If half a dozen people coordinated to add info on something not kosher though it would be a conspiracy against all that is good.
The goal is to maintain the consensus, as they've said before. Wikipedia is propaganda in its purest form, crowdsourced to wealthy out-of-touch "intellectuals" (sheltered opinionated arts graduates), oftsn citing journalists' bad interpretations of badly executed scientific papers, or even just opinion pieces. Ite the Ministry of Truth.
 
which claims that is a "conspiracy theory" because of course it does
Of course, I already mentioned it before, but decided to get the screencaps. Epstein didn't kill himself, conspiracy? Depends on whether the democrats like it.

When the article was first created, it was called a meme:
1770027793375.png

Around 2020 it was a conspiracy theory:
1770027852257.png

Luckily the introduction of "conspiracy theory" to the article was near the top when I was looking in the revision list:
1770027911465.png

Then it became a catchphrase for questioning epsteins death:
1770028015690.png

And now they settled on meme again:
1770028036741.png

I'm sure if you overlay the changes with the presidential campaign, the democrats their changing stance on releasing the files, and how damaging the files are to considered to be to Trump, you see will see it neatly oscillate between silly meme and truthfinding catchphrase.

Bonus, the user MLJ who said it was a conspiracy theory in every sense:
1770028176119.png
Tranny, homestuck fan (still needs to get around improving the homestuck page), elected in Connecticut and magnanimous enough to admit he has a conflict of interest in editing his own wikipedia page.
 
Última edición:
I realized that Wikipedia was completely broken when I went to the “woman” page. It doesn’t take many sentences before the tranny aspects are mentioned, and of course the site cannot define a woman by what a woman objectively/factually is.
 
If you search for "white replacement", the first result will likely be Wikipedia, which claims that is a "conspiracy theory" because of course it does. Despite this article:
If you want to add to the fun, look up the “Transgender Genocide” article. No claims of it being a conspiracy theory, no effort of refutation, it practically says that not being able to give kids bottom surgery is the same as the Holocaust. Biggest reason I refuse to give Wikipedo a dime.
 
I realized that Wikipedia was completely broken when I went to the “woman” page. It doesn’t take many sentences before the tranny aspects are mentioned, and of course the site cannot define a woman by what a woman objectively/factually is.
Is the profile pic of a woman still the chinese tranny that looks like Elliot William Fong?
 
I like to play a little game occasionally, where I look at some article that can only be about women, and see if it still lacks a mention of trannies, or lacks uses of nonwhite women. They still exist, surprisingly.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo