- Registrado
- 29 de Ene, 2018
2nd strike was the blue-beard-incident. As the link by @Haunter stated, each streamer comes with uniqueness and they should not feel unwelcome for what they are or how they look like. Which I can totally get behind. An elitist community who excludes members with "unwanted traits" is a dead community to begin with. So the temp ban for mocking him cuz of a blue beard was spot on.(I honestly forget what the 2nd one was for, was it also for the legal tender thing?
I think there are ways you can talk "bad" about other streamers but there is a fine line to what's allowed. Twitch can only create general rules, but they can't tell details or should give examples, this would only animate people to nearly miss the line on purpose.
That being said, reporting Phil for showing his feet for 1 second is pretty autistic. I haven't looked up if this rule really exists, but people say it does so I will trust them for now. This rule wouldn't effect Phil in the slightest because it's obvious that such a rule exist for foot fetish streamers, because this would make a hell lot of sense. Nobody will get horny when Phil jumps on his couch and his hooves can be seen for a fraction. His jumping had a completely different context.
Maybe this is the same context Phil speaks about, but mostly fails to elaborate in a way that could be understood. For example his shitty jokes which could be haaate speach and such. No, a shitty joke is still ment as a joke. Phil doesn't set on a straight face and says "Man I really hate Asians. I would bomb them to nirvana if I could". I guess being insensitive isn't good enough to get a strike, which is fine in my book.
However, the more I think about it, the less I understand why he didn't get a strike for the 11 year old pimp slap incident. This was 100% against the rules.
Maybe a case of oversaturation, too many reports, Twitch ignored it.