Debate Against Race Realist Wednesday

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
weev should stick to computers.

KEYpspv.jpg

EDIT: aren't we arguing on computers right now?

EDIT2: Even more examples
 
Última edición:
Even if your anecdotes are true which I doubt very much, a model can handle exceptions. Predictive validity is key. This is probabilistic, not deterministic.

James Dewey Watson...his IQ was but a respectable 120.
Reduced to fake anecdotes.

Let me get this straight, then: you believe that IQ is representative of a person's formal education.

In that case, you can't believe then that race is a determining factor in IQ, because lower IQ countries are consistently third-world, with poor or non-existent educational systems as result of government instability.

Either intelligence is an inherent thing that only people of certain heritage can have, or it's something that is effected by environment- i.e., access to education and other resources.
 
Let me get this straight, then: you believe that IQ is representative of a person's formal education.

In that case, you can't believe then that race is a determining factor in IQ, because lower IQ countries are consistently third-world, with poor or non-existent educational systems as result of government instability.

Either intelligence is an inherent thing that only people of certain heritage can have, or it's something that is effected by environment- i.e., access to education and other resources.
A lot of these 3rd world countries have also had issues with famines. A lack of proper nutrition can cause issues with brain development.
 
Let me get this straight, then: you believe that IQ is representative of a person's formal education.

In that case, you can't believe then that race is a determining factor in IQ, because lower IQ countries are consistently third-world, with poor or non-existent educational systems as result of government instability.

Either intelligence is an inherent thing that only people of certain heritage can have, or it's something that is effected by environment- i.e., access to education and other resources.

You're trying to say I think IQ variation is the result of education variation? No I think it's the other way around.
 
You can't quantify intelligence because there are a number of ways someone can be intelligent. Abraham Lincoln had a low IQ, but society at large views him as a cunning politician. IQs don't indicate whether or not someone has a degree, and IQ tests don't go over things like history and art. IQs also don't measure wisdom, technical skills, or social savvy.

Literally all IQs measure is perception, logic, and math.
That is the most idiotic thing ever written. Art major, were you?

Intelligence is rather easily quantifiable. Differences between sexes and groups are some of the most researched areas in psychology and intelligence studies. You can argue that the metrics are limited, but that does not mean that they are wrong. It is a very interesting area of study. Entire groups are dumber than others. Africa is dumb. Europe is smarter. Asia is smarter still. Then we have those dirty genius Jews who run the build-a-bear group. Men and women have same average and median IQ, but men have more variance. Men have more Isaac Newtons, but also more Christian Weston Chandlers.

The thing about intelligence is that it appears to be rather fixed. You will never be smarter than you are. You can make yourself dumber through smoking, drinking, syphilis, or watching Pony stories, but you can't get smarter through training or binaural beats. Society-wide intelligence changes over time. The west and east got smarter as their cultures advanced. Better ability to ward off disease and elements led to more smarts. Now the west is possibly dumbening. It was a good ride.

>IQs only measures the thing it measures.

Rulers are dumb. They only measure length. You will never know how hot or cold something is by using a ruler. Rulers stink.
 
Última edición:
I can't believe there are dudes in here taking this thread seriously and fighting with a guy who can't cite sources. You were supposed to post content guys not be the content.
 
That is the most idiotic thing ever written. Art major, were you?

Intelligence is rather easily quantifiable. Differences between sexes and groups are some of the most researched areas in psychology and intelligence studies. You can argue that the metrics are limited, but that does not mean that they are wrong. It is a very interesting area of study. Entire groups are dumber than others. Africa is dumb. Europe is smarter. Asia is smarter still. Then we have those dirty genius Jews who run the build-a-bear group. Men and women have same average and median IQ, but men have more variance. Men have more Isaac Newtons, but also more Christian Weston Chandlers.

The thing about intelligence is that it appears to be rather fixed. You will never be smarter than you are. You can make yourself dumber through smoking, drinking, syphilis, or watching Pony stories, but you can't get smarter through training or binaural beats. Society-wide intelligence changes over time. The wast and east got smarter as their cultures advanced. Better ability to ward off disease and elements led to more smarts. Now the west is possibly dumbening. It was a good ride.

>IQs only measures the thing it measures.

Rulers are dumb. They only measure length. You will never know how hot or cold something is by using a ruler. Rulers stink.

Are you seriously white-knighting for the dude with a swastika for an avatar?

I don't even necessarily disagree with you, but why the fuck are you giving creedence to a racist sped who got baited to post in a thread that was about his retarded ideology?

I can't believe there are dudes in here taking this thread seriously and fighting with a guy who can't cite sources. You were supposed to post content guys not be the content.

That's the trick, though. If we keep causing him to post here, we won't have to dig up shit to post ourselves.
 
Are you seriously white-knighting for the dude with a swastika for an avatar?

That's what this is isn't it? You don't like my avatar.

Aren't IQ tests almost exclusively focused on pattern matching and logical progression puzzles? If so, all they're really testing is how good you are at tetris. If that's the aryan claim to superiority, let them have it. The rest of us can get on with life in general.

%5BUNSET%5D.gif
 
Are you seriously white-knighting for the dude with a swastika for an avatar?

I don't even necessarily disagree with you, but why the fuck are you giving creedence to a racist sped who got baited to post in a thread that was about his exceptional ideology?



That's the trick, though. If we keep causing him to post here, we won't have to dig up shit to post ourselves.
It isn't a case of White knighting insomuch as it's addressing popular fallacies in the discourse on race, IQ and whatever the fuck happened in this thread.

In either case, who cares? The fact honkies and gooks do better on IQ tests isn't going to change your life for a second.
 
It isn't a case of White knighting insomuch as it's addressing popular fallacies in the discourse on race, IQ and whatever the fuck happened in this thread.

In either case, who cares? The fact honkies and gooks do better on IQ tests isn't going to change your life for a second.
This. I think we can all agree, no matter your IQ, that the real threat here is the Jews.
 
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo