- Registrado
- 20 de Oct, 2019
If that picture was taken more than four years ago I refuse to believe that man is still alive. TBQH, I'm not wholly convinced he was alive when it was taken.You best believe it buddy. He is very real.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
If that picture was taken more than four years ago I refuse to believe that man is still alive. TBQH, I'm not wholly convinced he was alive when it was taken.You best believe it buddy. He is very real.
Make of that what you will, but Gunn retconned that in Creature Comandos. It ended up being revealed that weasel was framed, and he actually loves and takes care of kids.James Gunn's self-insert in his movies is almost always a child abuser or child murderer, see Weasel in The Suicide Squad very clearly meant to be a James Gunn self-insert character.
I never watched creature commandos passed the opening credits of the first episode because the animated james gunn was too much self-indulgent egotism for me.Make of that what you will, but Gunn retconned that in Creature Commandos. It ended up being revealed that weasel was framed, and he actually loves and takes care of kids.
Why this was never even hinted on his Suicide Squad's movie is anyone's guess. But this does mirror his being canceled due to his tweets saga.
ah yesPeople give the snyder verse shit, but It was trying to say something and it had the balls to be serious
heheheheheJames Gunn really ruined the tone of blockbusters by making everything quipy and light hearted all the time.
dragging this back to Totoro there's a comicish thing by Miyazaki whereMaybe gunn considers himself to be a reformed/ex-pedo or something like that, making the villains in supergirl pedos could be a way of him further exercising those demons?
People give the snyder verse shit, but It was trying to say something and it had the balls to be serious
I think dark does not work for Superman. Light and serious should be the approach. Dark and serious works for BATMAN. Superman isn't above being quippy with a criminal who got too confident. But things shouldn't be dark with Superman. Serious? Sure. High stakes? Absolutely. But with Superman, the darkness shouldn't last for too long. Snyder forgot that.I have no idea why people, even people working at WB think Snyder's issue was that he has dark and serious. It wasn't.
On the contrary he was right on the money that this was the best path to differentiate the DCEU from Marvel. Trying to create an epic saga was a good idea too.
His main issue is how much he departed from the core of the characters. His Superman specially was too far from the classic boy scout. Making him a conflicted depressed god just didn't work.
The DCAU could be darker than he ever was. Just watch the video of how Hamill's joker died. And that was the alleged kid's show. And they managed without being secretly embarrassed of doing the characters straight.
How quickly do we forget Whedon. There are no Gunn quips. There are only Whedon quips. The reason the only Zack Snyder* marvel movie failed with critics was because it lacked Whedon quips.James Gunn really ruined the tone of blockbusters by making everything quipy and light hearted all the time.
Batman 89 is nothing like the Batman of prior yearsHis main issue is how much he departed from the core of the characters.
I think dark does not work for Superman. Light and serious should be the approach. Dark and serious works for BATMAN. Superman isn't above being quippy with a criminal who got too confident. But things shouldn't be dark with Superman. Serious? Sure. High stakes? Absolutely. But with Superman, the darkness shouldn't last for too long. Snyder forgot that.
hehehehehe
it's funny because it's been like that since everyone started copying whedon, horribly at that
I should have clarified that Gunn amplified what Whedon started.How quickly do we forget Whedon. There are no Gunn quips. There are only Whedon quips. The reason the only Zack Snyder* marvel movie failed with critics was because it lacked Whedon quips.
The director was inspired by the seriousness of Snyder when making her movie. He was the blueprint. And I'll say that her work on it, including the acting and almost everything else (apart from the action) was miles better than what Snyder has done on with the dceu.
Its amazing how how Snyder has done nothing but prove WB decision to cancel the DCEU was the right choice with his Netflix movies tanking hard and I don't see a single Snyderfag defending any post JL movie he's done. Its literally only pajeets and battered wives who worship the guy nowadays.overwhelming delusion won't overwrite reality, snyderfags
Gunn isn't that talented. He did what Disney thought they wanted and with that he censored his creativity which then neutered it.I should have clarified that Gunn amplified what Whedon started.
Batman 89 is nothing like the Batman of prior years
The Batman of the 90's is NOTHING like the Batman from 89, DCAU or the comics of the time
Nolan Batman is nothing like the Batman prior
Reeves Batman is also nothing like Nolan's
Superman can deal with dark and serious subjects. But it never lasts. It never lingers. Deal with the dark issue and move on. Snyder let it linger. The darkness stayed like a roommate that stopped paying rent and eats all your food. First movie: Superman's traumatic beginnings with his dead dad and the city that got destroyed. Second movie: Superman's kidnapped mother, status as a pariah and death. Third movie: Superman's dark resurrection and brainwashing. All with the Twilight filter that made everything look blue and depressing. This was a story with Superman in it but it was not a Superman story. Nothing in the Snyderverse made you feel hopeful when Superman was on screen. The tone, the story, the characters, nothing. All depressing. This was Batman: Speeding Bullet without the hopeful ending. I will give Snyder this: he knows how to write movies for other characters. He needed someone to rein him in for Superman stories though.I think dark and serious can work around Superman. He can, and has fought abusive fathers for example. He can right a reality evil corrupt executive ( Lex)
He can and has dealt with serious issues like suicide, and racism.
And he has done it without becoming an edge Lord. He can deal with dark issues so long as he keeps being that farm boy from Kansas that just wants to do good.