💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Free Chud?

  • Free him, he a good boy who dindu nuffin

    Votos: 201 39.5%
  • Enjoy prison, Chud

    Votos: 308 60.5%

  • Total de votantes
    509
Almost universally, the courts have rejected words alone as providing adequate provocation for a homicide unless accompanied by conduct indicating a present intention and ability to cause bodily harm.

Here's regarding the mutual combat and assault mentioned

Obviously you can't murder somebody over words, everyone knows that. You think maybe the bar might be a bit lower when a jury contemplates whether Chud the Builders words were enough to provoke a swing at him, genius?

But provocation is a side issue when it comes to evaluating whether Chud's actions are lawful. Those words will be used more to show his state of mind in order to determine whether he was in genuine fear for his life in that moment. Hint: the answer is no.

Since you're big on looking up terms, why don't you try "proportionality" and "mens rea".
 
Última edición:
It does not differentiate between lethal and non lethal force.

If you provoke the attack, then you lose the right to use force to defend yourself. Both fist and a gun are use of force.

So please, go ahead and type up your long and pointless post about the irrelevant differences between lethal vs non lethal use of force. I could use a good laugh.😂

You seem really set on trying to prove that a nuisance streamer should have the right to taunt and insult people by calling them nigger. Your a real hero of the white race my friend.

That, however, has nothing to do with whether Chud is going to get off for shooting an unarmed man that punched him at a courthouse in front of law enforcement.
 
To be fair to Chud he is an honorary nigger so he should have the pass.

He should use all the traits he has in common with the black community as a defense in court.
 
Immensely cucked

All of you morons that say 'b-but chud ACTED like a nigger!! so we have to treat him like one!!!' are cowards who would never apply that standard to an actual nigger.

'b-but he hits on minors?' Pulling up post facto justifications nobody knew about at the time nor care about pertaining to the actual incident is pathetic. This is about a white man calling a nigger a nigger and then being thrown in jail, further entrenching the precedent that black people can beat on whoever they want whenever they want as long as racist remarks are involved.

This is what you are working to establish as the law of the land and you can all go to hell
Supporting Chusd is supporting a white nigger, both sides were fuking retarded
 
Ever notice every "white supremacist" in the country is some variety of brownoid?

I'd never personally get the 23 and me shit but we got a family geneaologist fag who did (thanks a lot now I can never be a serial killer) and apparently I am about like 99 plus some percentile pure whitey. I pretty much landed right off the fucking Mayflower. I am as white as it is possible to get, and you know what, white supremacy can fucking blow me.
I don't wanna get on Null's shit list for politisperging in the Chud thread, but I do have some thoughts with regards to this,

There is an academic concept referred to as "Whiteness", basically saying that in our country, Whites hold the most cultural, political, and institutional power, that Whiteness has been stretched and extended further and further out to encompass more groups, and that the more similar a group is to the platonic ideal of a White person, the WASP, the more that the White power structure is willing to accept them. So, as an example, at one time, basically only the English were accepted as Whites, then it extended out to include the entire British Isles, then to include Northwestern Euros, then Slavs, Jews, and Mediterraneans, then all Euros. Today, it is debatably moving towards accepting Latin Americans, Middle Easterners, Indians, and certain mixed groups.

However, I think that in many respects, this power structure today, although founded by and centered around Whites, does not necessarily work for Whites anymore. Our racial hierarchy has been hijacked by an even smaller group of oligarchs that use our pre-existing cultural institutions to enrich themselves at everyone's expense. White power today is more about money than it is about Whiteness! These are institutions ostensibly run by Whites, so minority groups point at us as the enemy, because we benefit from it overall more than they do, but ultimately we are just as much servants to it as they are. They are willing to use White power structures to get a large chunk of Whites on board on the basis of working with your own people. This is normal, every culture does it, but the business and political class use it to manipulate us into working for them.

White culture is effectively not run or created by Whites anymore, it's made by corporations, celebrities and lobbying groups and then sold back to White Americans. It can be bought and sold and molded however they like, and American culture as a whole follows with it. I think a lot of Whites go along with this, but for those of us who care about our own culture, it's absolutely repulsive cosmopolitan garbage and is totally unrepresentative of life for the common White. It's designed to sell to the lowest common denominator, and made to be easily modified to sell to other cultures. So, many Whites seek out counter-culture of all sorts of varieties.

This is why there are so many wigmutts, White culture and power structures today are designed just as much to cater to minority groups that aspire to be White, as it is to appeal to actual White people. They think that by opposing affirmative action, voting MAGA, wearing reed seej skull masks, and indeed, supporting people like Chud, they will be allowed into White society. It's basically a form of social climbing and integration into White, and therefore, American society.

In essence, loads of Whites are turned off by corpo-culture, which has subsumed White culture, while White-passing minorities have begun to eat up this corpo-White culture, and integrate themselves into it. This is how you end up in situations where a guy descended from early American settler colonial families argues that the entire nation is built on racist principles and must be torn down to build a multicultural utopia, and ones where a Cuban Neo-Nazi shouts "Build that wall!", "Remember the Alamo!", and wants to see all illegals rounded up and put in camps. White supremacy is so pozzed that it's become a vessel for brownie social climbers. It's completely hostile to actual White people, and no good White man should be a White supremacist.
 
It's so hard to choose my least favorite character in "slightly off-white nigger nuisance streamer vs. rare nonposthumous sacred holey nigger of the month awardee(with a V device for violence)." I think we should actually be praising chud for shooting both of them.
Ever notice every "white supremacist" in the country is some variety of brownoid?

I'd never personally get the 23 and me shit but we got a family geneaologist fag who did (thanks a lot now I can never be a serial killer) and apparently I am about like 99 plus some percentile pure whitey. I pretty much landed right off the fucking Mayflower. I am as white as it is possible to get, and you know what, white supremacy can fucking blow me.
I am descended from *redacted to respect the post deletion (some bona fide cracker, probably)*
White Powerleveling. Whiteness can only be proven on the internet by the posting of timestamped nipple pics.
 
And the lord said down to chud go forth and harras niggers and thy bounty will be plentiful and child support shall not be able to be garnished from a w9 from the lords bounty of pump.fun

Screenshot_20260609_114506_Chrome.jpg
 
I don't see how mandating that 10 separate bonding companies have to post the bond is constitutional at all.
Cause a bond company can only do 100k so he needs 10 to pay a million
It's constructively meant to keep him in jail and violates the 8th Amendment by setting a bond that can't actually be met.
Maybe chud shouldn't have broken the law with a weapon while already on bond
And the lord said down to chud go forth and harras niggers and thy bounty will be plentiful and child support shall not be able to be garnished from a w9 from the lords bounty of pump.fun

Ver archivo adjunto 9121993
Shame these people cant find god before committing crimes
 
I don't see how mandating that 10 separate bonding companies have to post the bond is constitutional at all. It's constructively meant to keep him in jail and violates the 8th Amendment by setting a bond that can't actually be met.

His attorney isn't doing him any favors by not appealing this, but then again, he's got a floppy pussy for an attorney.
Getting 10 bonds companies to agree isn't impossible, and that's the point.
The court didn't deny bond and didn't make bond impossible. Chud's ability to pay bond was kept intact by the court.
This is the fun thing about Law. You can bend it to your will and still be "within" the law.
 
I’m curious about the idea of there being a bond at all. The court doesn’t want him out, and he is a violent wigger so why not just deny it? The argument is against unreasonable bail/bond just remove access to it. I don’t think I’ve typically seen arguments against the constitutionality of bond/bail being denied.

Letting him run amok at this point would likely cause more issues at this point. He’s not trying to bond out to take care of his family, he is not an upstanding member of the community, and honestly the chance that he makes a break for it is greater than zero. Per the reports he didn’t even show up that day to the court for his hearing on time.
 
I’m curious about the idea of there being a bond at all. The court doesn’t want him out, and he is a violent wigger so why not just deny it? The argument is against unreasonable bail/bond just remove access to it. I don’t think I’ve typically seen arguments against the constitutionality of bond/bail being denied.

Letting him run amok at this point would likely cause more issues at this point. He’s not trying to bond out to take care of his family, he is not an upstanding member of the community, and honestly the chance that he makes a break for it is greater than zero. Per the reports he didn’t even show up that day to the court for his hearing on time.
Better than letting another unemployed and unstable wigger out on the street to continue to be niggardly.
 
Cause a bond company can only do 100k so he needs 10 to pay a million
This seems to be a limitation imposed by the judge. I'm not on chuds side but I cant find limits on bond pay amounts for tenessee. I guess I could call one and ask about it but I'm not invested enough to do more than a few google searches. All I've found is that judges, at least in tenessee can limit how much a bond agency provider can pay at once. It is ultimately chuds fault for being a repeat criminal though and posting about wanting to kill niggers on his personal Twitter.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo