Bonesjones
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 27 de Ene, 2021
4. It's not an international human trafficking organization, its a junkie getting killed for stealingI also have a takeaway to add.
3. Burke did it.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
4. It's not an international human trafficking organization, its a junkie getting killed for stealingI also have a takeaway to add.
3. Burke did it.
5. She was drunk. She fell off the ship. She fell down 8 stories. She got knocked unconscious and drowned. She most likely got eaten by a shark or something since sharks follow ships.4. It's not an international human trafficking organization, its a junkie getting killed for stealing
Absolutely, as are the Central Park five.The West Memphis Three are guilty as shit
"They definitely didn't attack and attempt to rape this woman, it's just that an actual rapist showed up 5 minutes after they left so they are completely innocent"Absolutely, as are the Central Park five.
Small village, every street has a shitbag, everyone else in town knows, Hot Fuzz is a documentary.I'm torn on West Memphis Three, because I always thought the step dad did it. He creeped me out. Including in the documentary.
nooo think of the falloutNYC should be nuked.
Yeah. He was weird.Damien Echols was eventually gonna do something like that.
I'm not super familiar with the case, but I'm curious what leads you to think that. It seems to be one of those 'Burke did it', sort of broadly accepted truths.I actually think the West Memphis Three didn't do it,
I can answer. Because I think that stepdad was sketchy as hell.I'm not super familiar with the case, but I'm curious what leads you to think that. It seems to be one of those 'Burke did it', sort of broadly accepted truths.
Yeah. He was weird.
That's why I am torn on the culprit. Because Damien is sketchy, but that stepdad bugged me.Is currently weird.
That case is another example of what I’ve noticed a lot: too many sketchballs/good suspects in any given area…and that’s everywhere at anytime.
In 1981, a serial killer stalked the Shinjuku and Kabukicho districts in Tokyo. because this is the last case attributed to him. Despite numerous witnesses and a living victim, the killer was never caught or identified.
The other thing as well is that if you have spent a lot of time around white trash the step-dad is skeezy, but he's typical white trash skeezy, not "sodomize a 13 year old boy and then cut off the kid's cock and balls before beating him and his two friends to death with a stick" skeezy.The fact that the stepfather is weird isn’t surprising, given that they were all white trash and unsophisticated, agreeing to appear in those “documentaries.” The odds of the filmmakers finding an oddball to pin it on, associated with the victims, was approaching 100% and if they couldn’t find a friend or family member, then the whole town of West Memphis certainly would’ve produced at least a single suspect to spotlight as the real killer.
And if you want to be even more disgusted by it remember that the people who made that film did so with the express intention of garnering public sympathy for those boys' muderers so that they could be freed from prison.Having been using the internet since the last century, I have seen some shit in my time browsing it. Still, some things hit you differently. I watched Paradise Lost and in the beginning you see the poor young victims, the actual footage taken when they were discovered. Absolutely broke my heart, what ever they saw or did, they did not deserve to be violated like that. Rarely true crime makes me emotional anymore but that I really struggled to keep watching.
I think the allegations that he sexually abused Stevie could be true.The other thing as well is that if you have spent a lot of time around white trash the step-dad is skeezy, but he's typical white trash skeezy, not "sodomize a 13 year old boy and then cut off the kid's cock and balls before beating him and his two friends to death with a stick" skeezy.
There are degrees to this sort of thing. Could I believe the step-dad capable of murdering someone? Absolutely. Could I believe him capable of murdering a child? Maybe, possibly. Could I believe that he would murder three children in the way those three boys were murdered? No.