Congress mandates new car technology to stop drunken driving

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema ddw
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
https://apnews.com/article/coronavi...iness-health-068ee87392b0cca1444053b854a514dd (someone else archive)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Congress has created a new requirement for automakers: Find a high-tech way to keep drunken people from driving cars.

It’s one of the mandates along with a burst of new spending aimed at improving auto safety amid escalating road fatalities in the $1 trillion infrastructure package that President Joe Biden is expected to sign soon.

Under the legislation, monitoring systems to stop intoxicated drivers would roll out in all new vehicles as early as 2026, after the Transportation Department assesses the best form of technology to install in millions of vehicles and automakers are given time to comply.

In all, about $17 billion is allotted to road safety programs, the biggest increase in such funding in decades, according to the Eno Center for Transportation. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg says that could mean more protected bike paths and greener spaces built into busy roadways.

“It’s monumental,” said Alex Otte, national president of Mothers Against Drunk Driving. Otte called the package the “single most important legislation” in the group’s history that marks “the beginning of the end of drunk driving.”

“It will virtually eliminate the No. 1 killer on America’s roads,” she said.

Last month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported an estimated 20,160 people died in traffic collisions in the first half of 2021, the highest first-half total since 2006. The agency has pointed to speeding, impaired driving and not wearing seatbelts during the coronavirus pandemic as factors behind the spike.

Each year, around 10,000 people are killed due to alcohol-related crashes in the U.S., making up nearly 30% of all traffic fatalities, according to NHTSA.

Currently, some convicted drunken drivers must use breathalyzer devices attached to an ignition interlock, blowing into a tube and disabling the vehicle if their blood alcohol level is too high. The legislation doesn’t specify the technology, only that it must “passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired.”

Sam Abuelsamid, principal mobility analyst for Guidehouse Insights, said the most likely system to prevent drunken driving is infrared cameras that monitor driver behavior. That technology is already being installed by automakers such as General Motors, BMW and Nissan to track driver attentiveness while using partially automated driver-assist systems.

The cameras make sure a driver is watching the road, and they look for signs of drowsiness, loss of consciousness or impairment.

If signs are spotted, the cars will warn the driver, and if the behavior persists, the car would turn on its hazard lights, slow down and pull to the side of the road.

Abuelsamid said breathalyzers aren’t a practical solution because many people would object to being forced to blow into a tube every time they get into the car. “I don’t think it’s going to go over very well with a lot of people,” he said.

The voluminous bill also requires automakers to install rear-seat reminders to alert parents if a child is left inadvertently in the back seat, a mandate that could begin by 2025 after NHTSA completes its rulemaking on the issue. Since 1990, about 1,000 children have died from vehicular heatstroke after the highest total in a single year was 54 in 2018, according to Kidsandcars.org.

Congress, meanwhile, directed the agency to update decades-old safety standards to avert deaths from collapsing front seatbacks and issue a rule requiring automatic emergency braking and lane departure warnings in all passenger vehicles, though no date was set for compliance.

Most automakers had already agreed to make automatic emergency braking standard equipment in most of their models by September of next year, as part of a voluntary plan announced near the end of the Obama administration.

Buttigieg, promoting the legislation’s benefits Monday at a White House briefing, said he had traveled the country in recent months and seen too many roadside memorials for people who had died in preventable traffic deaths.

He pointed to a new $5 billion “Safe Streets & Roads for All” program under his department that will in part promote healthier streets for cyclists and pedestrians. The federal program, which he acknowledged may take several months to set up, would support cities’ campaigns to end traffic fatalities with a “Vision Zero” effort that could build traffic roundabouts to slow cars, carve out new bike paths and widen sidewalks and even reduce some roads to shift commuters toward public transit or other modes of transportation.

The legislation requires at least 15% of a state’s highway safety improvement program funds to address pedestrians, bicyclists and other nonmotorized road users if those groups make up 15% or more of the state’s crash fatalities.

“The best way to allow people to move in ways that are better for congestion and better for climate is to give them alternatives,” Buttigieg said. Describing much of it as a longer-term effort, he said, “this is how we do right by the next generation.”

Still, safety advocates worry that the bipartisan bill missed opportunities to address more forcefully an emerging U.S. crisis of road fatalities and urged the Transportation Department to deliver on immediate solutions.

They have called on a sometimes slow-moving NHTSA to address a backlog of traffic safety regulations ordered by Congress nearly a decade ago, such as mandatory rear seat belt reminders.

“Prompt action must be taken on comprehensive, commonsense and confirmed solutions to steer our nation toward zero crash fatalities,” said Cathy Chase, president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety. “Proven solutions are at hand; it’s time to take action.”

The department said Tuesday it will release a “safe system approach” to road safety in January that identifies safety action for drivers, roads, vehicles, speeds and post-crash medical care, stressing a need to move deliberately to ensure “sustained” improvements.

“These aren’t just numbers; these are family, friends, coworkers, neighbors and fellow Americans — and tragically and disproportionately, Black, brown and Native American,” said Deputy Transportation Secretary Polly Trottenberg. “It’s not acceptable the level of deaths that we’re seeing on American highways right now.”
 
itt "wtf why don't we enforce/have stronger dui laws"
instead of "wtf why do dui laws even exist"
this is why this forum is garbage
 
The group behind this legislation is called "Toward Zero Deaths", who want to eliminate traffic fatalities by any means necessary. They don't care that means instituting a dystopian society where they're watching you at every moment, because saving lives is more important.

I'm not sure who's funding them exactly, but there seems to be links between this and "Covid Zero" nonsense which believes that more lockdowns and vaccine mandates will somehow permanently eradicate the Chinese virus. Ideologically it's all Brave New World-tier utopian thinking where technology solves all our problems and we all will be happy (of course it's related to living in pods, eating bugs, etc.). Nobody's allowed to suffer the consequences for their behavior in the ideology of our current elite.
Like it or not, the overlords have decided that this will be the future of driving in the USA. You can either buy and maintain an older vehicle, or suffer the consequences of constant in-vehicle surveillance. And to be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if the government just outright bans older cars under the guise of "not meeting current emissions standards" or some equally bullshit excuse.
They'll ban them in some places, but in reality I expect the federal government to tax them out of existence with an insane gas tax which will be necessary for the environment. Or maybe require your vehicle to have a certain sticker on it that says it's a gasoline-powered vehicle, and this sticker costs thousands of dollars and needs to be renewed every year. They could also slap huge taxes on gas stations too (for the environment of course) meaning there will be few places to fill your older car up.

And don't forget insurance companies! Because your vehicle doesn't have the latest safety features, you are now "very high risk" so you will pay a fuckton of money more a month if you want to be insured. Better not get into an accident lest you be fucked.

The government rarely legally bans things these days, they just use corporations to ban things for them.
 
Allow me to tell you about niggers and spics.
In my state you can not renew your registration until your back car taxes are paid.
And a few years ago you they made it so you can not renew your registration unless your emissions was up to date. The bi-annual test costs money.
If you got pulled over with expired tags they would impound your car.

Guess what happened? Niggers and spics don't pay their taxes on time and don't believe in paying to get their car's emissions tested. And they where getting their cars impounded at an alarming rate. Some cities are now rolling with 20+ % of the cars with some sort of registration compliance issue. State troopers used to park at off ramps and with automatic plate readers and snag cars all day. That was very racist!
So now as long as you can show some sort of proof of insurance your good. Just another ticket they wont pay and they are sent on their way. Registration is now optional. There is no way they can tell you you "can't drive your car" until something is fixed.
Unless you, personally, are either a nigger or a spic, I don't see that working for you. Gotta fight that white supremacy, after all.
 
I used to pull to the side of the road to piss on road trips until my Uncle cautioned me against it. He's a truck driver, and he's said when you're parked on the side of the road, your car is like a bright attractive target for morons to plow into. He said he's seen many people die when they stop on the side of the road, and it isn't the magical safety land proposed in this... proposal.
 
How in the fuck can your ADD system naturally break down?
Anything can break down. Whether it be because of poor design, shoddy construction, or being susceptible to abuse. Cars are subject to a lot of shocks and vibrations in the course of normal usage. All the fancy ADD stuff they're talking about requires sensors connected by wires. Shocks and vibrations can misalign sensors, and work wires loose. A minor mishap that previously would amount to cosmetic damage on a bumper can fuck up sensors and suddenly you need a major repair to have a drivable car.
 
I don't agree with this kind of invasive tech, but it's kind of funny that this is coming from America, as two big contrasts between America and the UK when it comes to booze are; You can't drink for shit (generally) and drink driving is socially acceptable (generally).

It blew my mind to go to an American party and see people downing can after can of what it is essentially shandy, then jumping in their cars to go buy another 24 pack, while half-cut and cheered on.
 
Yeah they will give this new tech 5 years to be developed to avoid unnecessary casualties, meanwhile they are jabbing every arm they can get hold of with experimental genetic therapy that's been rushed to production in less than a year.
 
These people are obsessed with finding technical solutions to social problems. Morons.
This has nothing to do with drunk driving.

It's about getting cameras into car interiors.

Essentially every new car has a cellular modem. Coupled with cabin cameras, the feds will be able to stream video from everyone's car. Combine that with the phone everyone is carrying and the various microphones around people's homes (Alexa, Apple Homepod, smart TVs, etc), and they will have an unprecedented capability to monitor and suppress political dissidents.
 
This has nothing to do with drunk driving.

It's about getting cameras into car interiors.

Essentially every new car has a cellular modem. Coupled with cabin cameras, the feds will be able to stream video from everyone's car. Combine that with the phone everyone is carrying and the various microphones around people's homes (Alexa, Apple Homepod, smart TVs, etc), and they will have an unprecedented capability to monitor and suppress political dissidents.
Exactly. Imaging someone trying to 1776: Part 2 when the glowies can spy on vehicles, stop them remotely, and digital-only currency is erased with that push of a button so you're fucked when you run out of gas.

Your masters do not love you and never do anything to help you, only to help themselves.
 
The Biden Administration and its consequences have been disastrous for the Human race.

How do the rest of you maintain your sanity with so much of the world crumbling to degenerate ruin around you? The endlessly retarded fucko nonsense these people are constantly coming up with and forcing on the population is really starting to get me down.
 
cool cool.

Am I paying for this? Yes?
And do I benefit from it in any way? No?
Fuck off then.

Oh, nevermind I'm not paying for this? Then who?
Oh. Are they going to increase their prices to compensate the loss? Yes? Then I'm paying for this with no benefit to me.
Fuck off.

Oh, it'll lead to less deaths?
1. Why would I give a shit about other people dying, especially at this point.
2. How many less deaths, exactly. Make sure to have a comparison chart for the cost/lives saved ratio
3. Not having more people means less deaths, have you tried contributing?
Fuck off.
 
They absolutely will put it on every new car sold after 2026. Read the article, it's right in there. Have you seen a car made in the last 10 years that doesn't incessantly chime if you don't put a seat belt on? No, you haven't. This will be exactly the same, except possibly for high-end supercars that are the toys of the very rich.
My fucking work rig beeps when I have too much WORK RELATED shit on the passenger seat. It can't tell the difference between 30 lbs of paperwork and PPE and a fucking baby who shouldn't even be in the front seat anyway.

Fucking nip faggots.
 
I'd wager smart phone use has caused a bigger spike in fatalities than booze, tbh.
Uh oh, better mandate face tracking cameras in all cars too!
Bars and restaurants are going to shit themselves over this. Most people drink to get drunk or at least buzzed and 0.08 is not as drunk as you think it is. Nobody is going to want to go out anymore if your car isn't going to start after having a couple of drinks.
The lockdowns and vaccine mandates already ensure this.
 
To give an honest and yet simple solution, I'd say just make putting the key in harder. The worst that can happen to you is getting locked in your car until next day and not only you wont' kill anybody but you're also gonna be safe.
 
To give an honest and yet simple solution, I'd say just make putting the key in harder. The worst that can happen to you is getting locked in your car until next day and not only you wont' kill anybody but you're also gonna be safe.
Yeah but the problem is that wouldn't expand the surveillance state
 
Atrás
Top Abajo