Congress mandates new car technology to stop drunken driving

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema ddw
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
https://apnews.com/article/coronavi...iness-health-068ee87392b0cca1444053b854a514dd (someone else archive)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Congress has created a new requirement for automakers: Find a high-tech way to keep drunken people from driving cars.

It’s one of the mandates along with a burst of new spending aimed at improving auto safety amid escalating road fatalities in the $1 trillion infrastructure package that President Joe Biden is expected to sign soon.

Under the legislation, monitoring systems to stop intoxicated drivers would roll out in all new vehicles as early as 2026, after the Transportation Department assesses the best form of technology to install in millions of vehicles and automakers are given time to comply.

In all, about $17 billion is allotted to road safety programs, the biggest increase in such funding in decades, according to the Eno Center for Transportation. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg says that could mean more protected bike paths and greener spaces built into busy roadways.

“It’s monumental,” said Alex Otte, national president of Mothers Against Drunk Driving. Otte called the package the “single most important legislation” in the group’s history that marks “the beginning of the end of drunk driving.”

“It will virtually eliminate the No. 1 killer on America’s roads,” she said.

Last month, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported an estimated 20,160 people died in traffic collisions in the first half of 2021, the highest first-half total since 2006. The agency has pointed to speeding, impaired driving and not wearing seatbelts during the coronavirus pandemic as factors behind the spike.

Each year, around 10,000 people are killed due to alcohol-related crashes in the U.S., making up nearly 30% of all traffic fatalities, according to NHTSA.

Currently, some convicted drunken drivers must use breathalyzer devices attached to an ignition interlock, blowing into a tube and disabling the vehicle if their blood alcohol level is too high. The legislation doesn’t specify the technology, only that it must “passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired.”

Sam Abuelsamid, principal mobility analyst for Guidehouse Insights, said the most likely system to prevent drunken driving is infrared cameras that monitor driver behavior. That technology is already being installed by automakers such as General Motors, BMW and Nissan to track driver attentiveness while using partially automated driver-assist systems.

The cameras make sure a driver is watching the road, and they look for signs of drowsiness, loss of consciousness or impairment.

If signs are spotted, the cars will warn the driver, and if the behavior persists, the car would turn on its hazard lights, slow down and pull to the side of the road.

Abuelsamid said breathalyzers aren’t a practical solution because many people would object to being forced to blow into a tube every time they get into the car. “I don’t think it’s going to go over very well with a lot of people,” he said.

The voluminous bill also requires automakers to install rear-seat reminders to alert parents if a child is left inadvertently in the back seat, a mandate that could begin by 2025 after NHTSA completes its rulemaking on the issue. Since 1990, about 1,000 children have died from vehicular heatstroke after the highest total in a single year was 54 in 2018, according to Kidsandcars.org.

Congress, meanwhile, directed the agency to update decades-old safety standards to avert deaths from collapsing front seatbacks and issue a rule requiring automatic emergency braking and lane departure warnings in all passenger vehicles, though no date was set for compliance.

Most automakers had already agreed to make automatic emergency braking standard equipment in most of their models by September of next year, as part of a voluntary plan announced near the end of the Obama administration.

Buttigieg, promoting the legislation’s benefits Monday at a White House briefing, said he had traveled the country in recent months and seen too many roadside memorials for people who had died in preventable traffic deaths.

He pointed to a new $5 billion “Safe Streets & Roads for All” program under his department that will in part promote healthier streets for cyclists and pedestrians. The federal program, which he acknowledged may take several months to set up, would support cities’ campaigns to end traffic fatalities with a “Vision Zero” effort that could build traffic roundabouts to slow cars, carve out new bike paths and widen sidewalks and even reduce some roads to shift commuters toward public transit or other modes of transportation.

The legislation requires at least 15% of a state’s highway safety improvement program funds to address pedestrians, bicyclists and other nonmotorized road users if those groups make up 15% or more of the state’s crash fatalities.

“The best way to allow people to move in ways that are better for congestion and better for climate is to give them alternatives,” Buttigieg said. Describing much of it as a longer-term effort, he said, “this is how we do right by the next generation.”

Still, safety advocates worry that the bipartisan bill missed opportunities to address more forcefully an emerging U.S. crisis of road fatalities and urged the Transportation Department to deliver on immediate solutions.

They have called on a sometimes slow-moving NHTSA to address a backlog of traffic safety regulations ordered by Congress nearly a decade ago, such as mandatory rear seat belt reminders.

“Prompt action must be taken on comprehensive, commonsense and confirmed solutions to steer our nation toward zero crash fatalities,” said Cathy Chase, president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety. “Proven solutions are at hand; it’s time to take action.”

The department said Tuesday it will release a “safe system approach” to road safety in January that identifies safety action for drivers, roads, vehicles, speeds and post-crash medical care, stressing a need to move deliberately to ensure “sustained” improvements.

“These aren’t just numbers; these are family, friends, coworkers, neighbors and fellow Americans — and tragically and disproportionately, Black, brown and Native American,” said Deputy Transportation Secretary Polly Trottenberg. “It’s not acceptable the level of deaths that we’re seeing on American highways right now.”
 
This country is fucked. Everyone's too fat, stupid, and addicted to bread and circus to ever revolt, so they'll just get away with this forever. RIP American experiment.
 
"The cameras make sure a driver is watching the road, and they look for signs of drowsiness, loss of consciousness or impairment.
If signs are spotted, the cars will warn the driver, and if the behavior persists, the car would turn on its hazard lights, slow down and pull to the side of the road."

Yeah, I totally can't see any way that this will go wrong... I'll bet the system automatically calls the cops too, for a "wellness check".

Jesus Christ, this is yet another time I'm enormously glad that I don't live in that shithole country any more.
 
So hypothetically, if someone was to be chased by a murderer or there was a natural disaster, cars would be useless?
 
Calm down all of you. There are about 286 million cars in the USA (almost as much people) there is no feasible way they are going to put this shit in every car. At worst they will just do it for people who actually have a DUI on their record.
 
I’d say the breathalyzers are way overdue, the rest of that stuff is nonsense.
I’ve been on a grand jury and %95 of cases were DUIs, usually not their first either. We don’t have enough jails for drunks, so this is a start.
 
Calm down all of you. There are about 286 million cars in the USA (almost as much people) there is no feasible way they are going to put this shit in every car. At worst they will just do it for people who actually have a DUI on their record.
They absolutely will put it on every new car sold after 2026. Read the article, it's right in there. Have you seen a car made in the last 10 years that doesn't incessantly chime if you don't put a seat belt on? No, you haven't. This will be exactly the same, except possibly for high-end supercars that are the toys of the very rich.
 
Calm down all of you. There are about 286 million cars in the USA (almost as much people) there is no feasible way they are going to put this shit in every car. At worst they will just do it for people who actually have a DUI on their record.

Um, news flash: There ALREADY is a law that mandates the device for DUI/DWI's.

Second: Oh, no the WILL put it in every car. It is against their fiduciary and ideologial best interests to NOT put them in all new vehicles.

Third: Poo poo pee pee wringthink? OOPSIE DOOPSIES...your car don't work!

Fourth: Rapo or stalker who's drunk jack Yo car? OOPSIE DOOPSIE!
 
I think it is a good idea.

But they said they've no idea the actual technology that will be mandated.

But what's next, the car will decide if I am over the speed limit to turn my car off next? Or haven't paid my taxes? or fines?
 
I think it is a good idea.

But they said they've no idea the actual technology that will be mandated.

But what's next, the car will decide if I am over the speed limit to turn my car off next? Or haven't paid my taxes? or fines?
Be quiet, some bureaucrats might check KF and see your suggestions.:story:

Btw, no doubts then some hackers will probably work for some loopholes in these devices.
 
I think it is a good idea.

But they said they've no idea the actual technology that will be mandated.

But what's next, the car will decide if I am over the speed limit to turn my car off next? Or haven't paid my taxes? or fines?
I'm just waiting for it to automatically fine you every time you stay at a parking meter for too long and call an tow truck, afterwards.
 
old beater used cars are just going to get even more expensive as soon as that's implemented people will 'Nope' that and just keep buying used cars for as long as possible.

with the incoming hyper-inflation factored in I expect to see an early 2000's Chrysler minivan selling for $10,000 as droves of people will avoid the 'high tech' doodads in newer cars that Congress "mandates".
 
Última edición:
They absolutely will put it on every new car sold after 2026. Read the article, it's right in there. Have you seen a car made in the last 10 years that doesn't incessantly chime if you don't put a seat belt on? No, you haven't. This will be exactly the same, except possibly for high-end supercars that are the toys of the very rich.
I read the article and I am telling you it's a load of shit. An annoying chime is one thing but fucking cameras? Auto pilot that takes you off the road? Facial recognition to tell when you are getting tired or are too drunk? And yeah cars made before 2026 absolutely matter because how many people own a current year car? Most people go for the cheaper older models anyway.
 
Calm down all of you. There are about 286 million cars in the USA (almost as much people) there is no feasible way they are going to put this shit in every car. At worst they will just do it for people who actually have a DUI on their record.
Allow me to tell you about the emissions test. It's an annual test where your car has to be taken to an auto shop and checked to ensure the pollutants it produces meet or are below government standards. If you don't pass an emissions test, you can't drive your car until the problem is fixed (at your expense.)

Now, imagine, if you will, a test to ensure that this equipment is in every car and is working properly. You can't drive the car unless your anti-drunk-driving (ADD) equipment is up to standard. Don't have your ADD computer? Or your ADD computer isn't working? Too bad, porky. Fork over the cash so we can restrict your freedom further.
 
I'd wager smart phone use has caused a bigger spike in fatalities than booze, tbh.
In current year? Almost definitely. They even say that only 30% of traffic deaths are dewies. The constant daytime and rush hour accidents I see around here aren't caused by impairment... well not the chemical kind anyway. A guy I knew got RIP'd a few months ago when a cell phone bitch drove right into him while he was on his motorcycle.

This is the biggest faggot shit and it'd be smart to buy a few clean non-compliant vehicles before it happens, because their resale value is almost guaranteed to go up. The technology sounds dumb as fuck too. If I slouch in my seat and squint my eyes on a 12 hour drive, is the motherfucker gonna shut off on me? What if I lean over to fiddle with something on the passenger seat? Not everyone's a literal submoron who can't drive. Imagine the car doing an "emergency stop" because you got out of the camera angle a little bit, or it decided you were too close to the median/objects?

At this point I'm really hoping I'm right about the decay of industrial society making these dystopian control measures impossible, because if I'm wrong we're quickly headed for the worst kind of safety net world.
 
Última edición:
Allow me to tell you about the emissions test. It's an annual test where your car has to be taken to an auto shop and checked to ensure the pollutants it produces meet or are below government standards. If you don't pass an emissions test, you can't drive your car until the problem is fixed (at your expense.)

Now, imagine, if you will, a test to ensure that this equipment is in every car and is working properly. You can't drive the car unless your anti-drunk-driving (ADD) equipment is up to standard. Don't have your ADD computer? Or your ADD computer isn't working? Too bad, porky. Fork over the cash so we can restrict your freedom further.
How in the fuck can your ADD system naturally break down?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo