- Registrado
- 16 de Mar, 2024
Doesn't make sense if God is the one who sustains everythingcontinues to exist apart from God
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Doesn't make sense if God is the one who sustains everythingcontinues to exist apart from God
This parable has always worried me, Abraham says to the rich man, you received your reward on earth, Lazarus suffered while alive and receives his reward after he passed through the mortal coil... what worries me is that we are supposed to store up our treasures (rewards) in heaven, is it possible to do both? (Have your needs met through life on Earth and still be building up treasures in heaven?both the rich man and Lazarus (whether this be that Lazarus, or some figure) experienced a conscious afterlife.
Abraham was rich. Isaac was rich. So was Jacob. So was Job. So was Boaz. Joseph of Arimathea was able to use his wealth to fulfil prophecy by having Jesus laid in his tomb.This parable has always worried me, Abraham says to the rich man, you received your reward on earth, Lazarus suffered while alive and receives his reward after he passed through the mortal coil... what worries me is that we are supposed to store up our treasures (rewards) in heaven, is it possible to do both? (Have your needs met through life on Earth and still be building up treasures in heaven?
I'm interested in a dialouge on this topic, as I want for nothing on Earth, but Paul and Joshua both seem to have defeated the world, but the flesh and more broadly Satan were unable to be defeated by either. I understand that all of our victories actually belong to Christ, but can you have rewards both on Earth and in Heaven?
So the rich man could have fed Lazarus (or done a similar kindness) to avoid being used in this parable? I practice kindness on the streets around me and I understand why you never see proper church folk doing it, as you are exposing yourself to the sins of this world and it is easy to be overcome by desire. It is unappealing to become a target of robbery because you are known to have wealth and share it, but Christ said the world hated him and it will continue to hate his followers; there's a circle I'm trying to square here, I'm just not sure what it is, something to do with the way to rob a strong man is to first bind his arms.Abraham was rich. Isaac was rich. So was Jacob. So was Job. So was Boaz. Joseph of Arimathea was able to use his wealth to fulfil prophecy by having Jesus laid in his tomb.
There is nothing wrong with wealth. The problem is when money comes before (and therefore instead of) God.
So the rich man could have fed Lazarus (or done a similar kindness) to avoid being used in this parable? I practice kindness on the streets around me and I understand why you never see proper church folk doing it, as you are exposing yourself to the sins of this world and it is easy to be overcome by desire. It is unappealing to become a target of robbery because you are known to have wealth and share it, but Christ said the world hated him and it will continue to hate his followers; there's a circle I'm trying to square here, I'm just not sure what it is, something to do with the way to rob a strong man is to first bind his arms.
There's a wider discussion to be had about how much you can have your money do for you without ever actually doing anything yourself... I could see both sides of which is more impactful, what do you think about it? Old Testament law was 10%, New Testament has the story of the poor widow that gave everything that she had to the offering and was said to have given more than all the rest combined. It does cost money to live, would we just give our homes up and evangalize like the disciples did, and know no home?Ver archivo adjunto 7774434
I'm not hating on billionaires, but she makes a good point.
We're expected to put what we're given to good use, but what is the best use for material resources? I think there's no definitive answer, just as there's no definitive vocation - Priests and Spouses are both needed for the earthly Church.It does cost money to live, would we just give our homes up and evangalize like the disciples did, and know no home?
Think of it more like this: how can I use my wealth for the glory of God?So the rich man could have fed Lazarus (or done a similar kindness) to avoid being used in this parable? I practice kindness on the streets around me and I understand why you never see proper church folk doing it, as you are exposing yourself to the sins of this world and it is easy to be overcome by desire. It is unappealing to become a target of robbery because you are known to have wealth and share it, but Christ said the world hated him and it will continue to hate his followers; there's a circle I'm trying to square here, I'm just not sure what it is, something to do with the way to rob a strong man is to first bind his arms.
the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart and he would not listen to Moses and Aaron, just as the LORD had said to Moses
A wicked person immediately goes to Hell when they die, and the Elect go to Heaven immediately. Wicked people don't cease to exist when they die.Give clarity, for in the parable of Lazarus and the rich man, both the rich man and Lazarus (whether this be that Lazarus, or some figure) experienced a conscious afterlife.
There are many New Testament verses speaking out against mammon; none of the Christians in the New Testament were wealthy people who had fancy homes, clothing, vehicles (chariots?), etc. That money isn't going with anyone when they die, you entered the world naked and will leave it naked. Stuff like that is why I'm beginning to embrace minimalism as a Christian ideal.Ver archivo adjunto 7774434
I'm not hating on billionaires, but she makes a good point.
Mental prayer, adoration, and lectio divina are perfect for that type of prayer. You don't need to only pray 'formal' prayers, especially if your heart isn't it in. But try praying them slower, meaning each word sincerely. And if you can't, ask the Lord for the grace you need to pray in a manner most pleasing to Him.missed both the transfiguration and dormition services because of laziness after work and very gay personal drama which I let get into my head. Think I'm suffering from spiritual indigestion. structured prayer also feels really strange and unstructured now since I started trying to be honest and just talk to the Lord as I am instead of just copying what other people have written down.
There's a good Chesterton quote about how at the beginning of the Faith, Christians were offered the chance to basically put an effigy of Christ up along with other pagan gods and basically treat it like how Romans typically treated foreign gods. It would've destroyed the Faith in the name of "tolerance". It's why it grinds me when people say "Oh, you can come to God on your own or through some other path". Modern philosophy is vacuous and in the case of French Marxist theology is evil. I'm not going to brow beat someone for believing something different then me, but I will air my worries to an associate. I unfortunately am not St. Peter of Syria (truth nuked Muslims in 764ish and got hacked apart because they couldn't handle it).The Wisdom of Bl. Fulton Sheen
Day 227 - America, it is said, is suffering from intolerance-it is not. It is suffering from tolerance. Tolerance of right and wrong, truth and error, virtue and evil, Christ and chaos. Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded.
I tend to like Chesterton and Lewis, although Lewis was an Anglican sadly.The Theosophists build a pantheon; but it is only a pantheon for pantheists. They call a Parliament of Religions as a reunion of all the peoples; but it is only a reunion of all the prigs. Yet exactly such a pantheon had been set up two thousand years before by the shores of the Mediterranean; and Christians were invited to set up the image of Jesus side by side with the image of Jupiter, of Mithras, of Osiris, of Atys, or of Ammon. It was the refusal of the Christians that was the turning-point of history. If the Christians had accepted, they and the whole world would have certainly, in a grotesque but exact metaphor, gone to pot. They would all have been boiled down to one lukewarm liquid in that great pot of cosmopolitan corruption in which all the other myths and mysteries were already melting. It was an awful and an appalling escape. Nobody understands the nature of the Church, or the ringing note of the creed descending from antiquity, who does not realize that the whole world once very nearly died of broadmindedness and the brotherhood of all religions. - GK Chesterton, Orthodoxy