- Registrado
- 26 de Jun, 2024
I do not identify with any particular denomination but I think most scholars both Christian and not, mostly agree that Jesus was most certainly a historical person with the Son of God thing being debated amongst them, in terms of my actual beliefs I guess you could consider me to be a Cultural Christian but I think that's kind of stretch while I do find the vast majority of ideas on Christian morality to be immensely appealing, the idea of a Eternal Reward with no struggle is not an idea I really find appealing, I think its human nature not to desire struggle, but to want to overcome struggle when it occurs, while the idea of Heaven is certainly more appealing then Spitroasting in Fire for eternity I feel if I did embrace any particular denomination and I went with the correct one and there is a God that views me as worthy of Heaven id get bored after awhile, not to sound particularly offensive but I couldn't find a better way to word it
this was most certainly not the case, there is one incident in the Bible where Jesus gets angry with the cleansing of the Temple because the Js were operating markets in the Temple, and historians do agree that the Crucifixion was one of two historical events that were certain along with his Baptism, and considering the fact that you had to piss off the Js in order to get executed in 1st century Roman Judea im fairly certain the Cleansing in the Temple actually happened too, they wouldnt have killed him if he wasnt calling them out on their bullshit, which probably led them to cry to Pilate and threaten to wield their influence against the interests of Rome in order to get him to agree to do so, so the idea that Liberals have that its inherently evil in Christianity to experience Anger or that tolerating bad people is a requirement is not only a misinterpretation of Biblical Principal, but also them deliberately lying in order to get Christians to do what they wantJesus in this case being a caricature of Jesus as a hippy.
Those "Christians" aren't actually Christian in any sense, the type of Christians to fly pride flags and have women as Priests or Pastors always operate on whatever is socially acceptable at the time type of morality, thats why they argue that disgust for Trans people is somehow a sin, when in fact Tolerating Trans people is the real sin, and the Bible literally commands Christians to help anyone they know with such desires to try to pull them out of it before it gets too lateNow they mainly fight for polyamory and Trans rights.
its unfortunate, but a lot of Boomer Catholics feel that way too, most of them grew up in the Post-Vatican II Church so in terms of Catholicism a lot of them are going to be in support of Gays and Abortion when Catholicism is literally opposed to these doctrinally, this seems to have somewhat ended with Gen Z, especially in terms of converts so hopefully for the sake of Catholics Gen Z brings Catholicism back to the 50s in terms of Social Issues and raises Gen Betas born into it in that mannerThis is what the vast majority of Christians in western countries believe. In this regard Universalists are not a minority.