Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Destacado
Is there an Eriks Kirk/TPUSA thread? If not I'm sure you have enough to make one. Maybe people would be less hostile to your updates if they were somewhere dedicated.

You clearly see it as relevant (and it might end up being. Not saying don't post) but it's also clear that a lot of people see it threadshitting.
 
Lemmingwiser dijo:
There are still people that think erika kirk isn't shady.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=NAAYgbV6aQI
Presiona para expandir...

Did this guy get AIDS or something? I haven't seen him in like a decade. Why does he look sickly?

As someone who checked out of the situation after it happened, watching Erika Kirk fills me with a weird gnawing bad feeling in my stomach. Something seems really off.
 
Lemmingwiser dijo:
There are still people that think erika kirk isn't shady.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=NAAYgbV6aQI
Presiona para expandir...
They're sub-human, kike-whipped, pedo worshipping, dysgenic faggots and niggers who listen to AI music about a guy whose whole career was debating college about much he loves Israel.
Screenshot_20260128_224454_Chrome.jpg
Trump could literally rape these faggots with his micro penis and they'd be in denial about getting raped, while also begging for more at the same time. Have some dignity, be a man, stop worshipping politicians and influencers.
 
Battery Low dijo:
Is there an Eriks Kirk/TPUSA thread? If not I'm sure you have enough to make one. Maybe people would be less hostile to your updates if they were somewhere dedicated.

You clearly see it as relevant (and it might end up being. Not saying don't post) but it's also clear that a lot of people see it threadshitting.
Presiona para expandir...
There isn't an Erika Kirk/TPUSA thread. I appreciate your attempt at seeking a resolution. I don't think such a thread makes sense, tbh.


A small group of people aren't negrating me because they think it's off topic. I've been blamed for not posting updates about the court case when I had posted factual updates on the court case on that very page.

I think what's rather the case is that people aren't very rational about this topic (understandably) and that my attempts at finding truth on this topic no matter where it may lead put me on a tiny island politically, somewhere between the tranny left that's divorced from truth as a concept and too irresponsible and/or evil to fix this, and the epstein israel right. I don't think I'm excluded from the group that has difficulty being rational about this topic, to be clear, perhaps just making a bit more effort to be.

One of the reasons I came to this conclusion is because when the conflict in this thread flashed to other threads briefly, it generally results in one side being negrated (tim pool is an example of a thread where it happened to the other side, there was a politics thread where it happened to me).

These experiences tell me it's more about social or political bubbles rather than the exact rationality of the topics discussed. There has been a general unwillingness to acknowledge their mistakes (I'm open about my mistake to believe Candace for a while), which again shows me it's more about trying to shut me up, than wanting this focused on the court case or charlie kirk aftermath as they claim.

There is mostly engagement on the gravedancing part and what that tells me is that it's an interest in the proof about how the left is evil and how the death of charlie kirk works as a letter of marque or a cassus belli, rather than a genuine deep interest in what happened and if justice is being done and if Tyler Robinson was working alone or not and if it was even him that was responsible or not. Though whenever I have something big, that gets positive engagement too. Though sometimes the big parts only makes sense if you take note about small developments as well, which means that posts that are only negrated or unrated aren't necessarily without value for the larger picture either. Sometimes it's a lot of boring minutiae to see a full picture develop.

It could be worth a discussion, but I don't think this group wants a resolution besides me being threadbanned for showing the parts of the assassination aftermath that they want to pretend don't exist.
 
Última edición:
Taste of Spanish version of We Are Charlie Kirk






And in Italian:
 
CoolFool dijo:
Candace and Jimmy go on to talk about how Charlie's security sucked and how he had the event outside even though security advised against it. Security was told that Charlie preferred to do it outside, so that's why he did it despite being advised not to. How does Jimmy and Candace not see the huge flaw in their argument here? If this was all set up to shoot Charlie, why would have security even bothered to advise him to have the event inside? What if Charlie had agreed with them and had it inside? That would have ruined their plan to kill him outside.

They bring up how Charlie's security didn't have drones scanning the roof. This is admittedly a huge fail. Cernovich is a bit of a cow but stated there were fights between security and campus police about using drones. Cernovich said this has happened to him as well when he has gone on speaking tours. I believe this is incompetence and someone should be held accountable for this, but I do not see this as proof that Charlie was being set up to be killed (Especially when they asked him to hold it inside but he declined).

Again Candace and Jimmy bring up another unrelated and totally different case and try to make it seem like it's the same as Charlie's. They bring up how Trump almost died by that freak in Butler and how that case is suspicious and there were too many security fails to be an accident. Charlie was not Trump. Trump is the most powerful leader in the WORLD that has multiple targets on him from inside the White House and abroad. It is suspicious how a lone soy redditor with zero online footprint somehow managed to get past the security of the most powerful man alive and nearly succeeded in killing him. We still don't know shit about this guy or why he was in contact with people a guy like him had no business being in contact with. Contrast that to Tyler Robinson, who had an online footprint and nothing about hims is surprising. He also went after a much easier target in a place with lax security. These two situations are not remotely the same.

Candace and Jimmy talk about the most "compelling" evidence that this whole thing was set up: the bullet wound. They show a video of some retired military SEAL guy who says that Charlie's head should have been blown off. They say we should listen to this guy because he's an expert. This is frustrating because other experts have also come out and explained why Charlie's head wasn't blown off. So if we should trust the experts, why does Jimmy and Candace trust this guy over the others? They offer no explanation as to why his expert opinion is more right than others. Candace then says something that I personally find extremely annoying. She says that there was no blood on Charlie's back. To her this is proof that the bullet/gun Tyler used is something different than what the FBI found. This dumb bitch is not an expert in how guns work nor does she know jack shit about wounds yet she talks like she's so sure! I am also not an expert. But I work in healthcare and can tell you that wounds don't always look like what you expect them to look like. That poor woman that was stabbed in the neck on the subway also didn't have blood spurting out everywhere like you'd think would happen on a jugular wound, yet she still died.
Presiona para expandir...

I love that you didn't even know Charlie before this happened and yet even YOU can instantly sniff and call out Candace's absolute bullshit tactics. The only other person I've seen to accurately describe her grifting tactics so well is Tim Pool. I rated you winner for just for those parts alone.

It seems at this point Candace's gay little grift has fallen to the wayside, but seriously, fuck her. Fuck her. Fuck her. Fuck her.

Sorry, I'm not as eloquent as you.
 
Última edición:
Defense continues to argue a conflict of interest of the deputy county attorney, who's the daughter was present at the event. Prosecution wants to bring video of the assassination into the case to prove that the daughter was not a necessary material witness to the assassination.

Next court date is 24th of february.


Defense attorneys also want camera's gone from the court, due to how prejudicial the zooming in on tyler robinson and having media lip readers is.
 
Candace updates us on how Charlie Kirk often spoke of his third eye, the street lamps that would turn off as he ran by, he and Candace could also astral project.

Is this why Erika killed him?

2026-02-06 (1).png




Erika even talks about it for some reason.
 
Última edición:
So what were Candace's origins, anyway? Mister Metokur his last stream brought her up briefly and mentioned she was on the political-left until suddenly she swerved right, and he never liked her from the start, I just can't recall if he said what she was working for before becoming independent (if so). Was she always a grifter, or did something in her brain break and she became that way?
 
Kari Kamiya dijo:
So what were Candace's origins, anyway? Mister Metokur his last stream brought her up briefly and mentioned she was on the political-left until suddenly she swerved right, and he never liked her from the start, I just can't recall if he said what she was working for before becoming independent (if so). Was she always a grifter, or did something in her brain break and she became that way?
Presiona para expandir...
check her wikipedia early career section, she used to be a psychopathic "apolitical" radfem shitlib who doxxed edgelords and conservative people for their "offensive" posts and when she got condemned by fellow shitlibs as well and got doxxed herself she sperged out at them and switched sides and became a conservative.
 
Última edición:
Kari Kamiya dijo:
So what were Candace's origins, anyway? Mister Metokur his last stream brought her up briefly and mentioned she was on the political-left until suddenly she swerved right, and he never liked her from the start, I just can't recall if he said what she was working for before becoming independent (if so). Was she always a grifter, or did something in her brain break and she became that way?
Presiona para expandir...
She has a thread, though the OP is terrible:

H

💰 Grifter Tema 'Candace Owens / RedPillBlack / SocialCoroner'

There's a new service being kickstarted that basically functions as a database for people's dox and allows anonymous users to send in dox so those people can be harassed by internet lynch mobs.

http://socialautopsy.com/faq/

This is obviously a great thing for us and I encourage everybody to donate whatever they can spare to the kickstarter.

[MEDIA=kickstarter]1968200734/wave-goodbye-to-cyberbullies-and-trolls-socialauto[/MEDIA]
  • HG 400
  • Respuestas: 1,727
  • Foro: Lolcows
Reacciones:Triste x 57 Enojado x 17 Semper Fidelis x 5 Islamic Content x 3 Dumb x 3 Me gusta x 2 Mad at the Internet x 1 Me encanta x 1 Lol x 1 Jaja x 1

edit:
since you ask from a Metokur perspective, he would have first learned about her during gamergate. Candace started a site called Social Autopsy, which was to be a database for people who acted like assholes online, as a kind of anti-bullying effort. One of the things that happened is that Zoe Quinn got wind of it, and probably saw her as a competitor. She contacted Candace and asked her to stop. She warned that Candace would probably be harassed by gamergate. Immediately after their contact their email was flooded with harassing messages in the email. It was a common pattern, something similar happened with Felicia Day. Probably false flag shit, but who knows, right?

The comments on social autopsy website, which was mostly just an idea and a badly functioning prototype, had the comments open, and was flooded with friendly gamergate comments about how it all was just ethics in game journalism.

Candace at the time responded mostly professionally and friendly at the time. Not too long after she pivoted and saw how she could profit from the culture war.

Things like redpillblack ("red pilled black woman") and later working with Prager, Daily Wire and Charlie Kirk (TPUSA).

My favorite moment remains the Dave Rubin moment (Dave and Candace recently went scorched earth on each other. She met her Husband through Dave.) where she debated Blaire White, which was about the most jerry springer event I've seen, even when compared to the whole internet blood sport arc.
 
Última edición:
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo