Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

>Raven Samuelson
this profile HAS to be a joke. he must of selected “all of the above” on his systematic oppression sheet. all he needs now is jewish and disabled so he can come full circle. and of course he lives in cape town. :stress: Ver archivo adjunto 7908517
472649508_1184645403087079_7528469498684946705_n.webp
"i hate nazis!"

one should be proud to be hated by a creature such as this
 
it's not just any political murder, but political murder against the same side that the family is on. the guy killed kirk for expressing standard conservative political positions. his family are conservatives themselves who most likely share most of kirks views.
kind of a "if you weren't my dad then i would slaughter you without a second thought, you fucking nazi!" situation.
is it safe to keep your son around your family under these circumstances?
should you go out of your way to protect and shield your son from law enforcement when he harbors such extreme hatred for you?
Adam and Sitch's stream on this was talking about cooling the fire and one way being to basically ask that question, if this was your dad would you support it? You still love your "racist" grandpa right?

Truthfully, no, at least not for people who were celebrating or have/are planning an attack like this. That's definitely not the majority of the non-right, but it's a huge segment of the far left Reddit/Bluesky types.

There's innumerable videos by these people, especially troons, online where they talk shit about their parents. 9/10 times the parent is loving but just misunderstands what the issue is, and that's good enough to be completely disowned because they are literally in online cults.

I don't think in a general sense (not sure about this specific person) saving these parents from familicide other than being the meal ticket for these deranged kids.
 
Someone said this here on Kiwifarms somewhere, so let me paste it. I think it explains it well.



Once you understand this it all makes sense. They don't see their own politics as politics. They see it as moral positions and the absolute gold standard of humanity. They see it as set in stone and universal truths. It's not politics, it's called being a decent human being after all. And they mean it.
You see the “we won’t argue with people who deny your existence” or things like that. Note that the left rejects debate framing even of say discussion of black crime or the merits of trans identity in terms of implicitly exterminationist intention.

The more multi racial a society becomes the more this logic makes sense-identity is not up for discussion. It’s existential after all.

In which case-why do we have a democracy? Same with trans stuff-wherein fundamental questions of personhood and identity are considered off limits to scrutiny or even criticism.

People on the left have said Kirk wasn’t arguing in good faith, or he was unfairly dunking 19 year old co Eds, or whatever-maybe that’s true, but Kirk was willing to have conversations. Even if there was a grift element to it.

The left can’t even work up the will to justify its own ideas to the mass public. And has in fact completely retreated from doing so.
 
There's so much said about this guy's Discord messages. Obviously he has a digital footprint, but it's shocking that it's not really been dug up.
Oh, they worked overtime getting that shit off the web asap. Remember, the general public didn't find out about who this guy was until long (long enough) after they got him. The only things we really had the time to dig up was his mother's facebook, which was in the process of getting wiped.
 
The first post from the nigger is absolutely in the realm of advocating for violence, i assume they aren't employed because they are a nigger but i think it's worth digging up as much info as possible and contacting employers if there are any.
Turns out he's South African, so the best I can hope for Vantablack Helmut Kentler there is that he gets raped to death & then eaten by some bigger and stronger AIDS-riddled turbonigger who's desperate for lols & sustenance when South Africa collapses into civil war & famine.
 
The people saying Charlie Kirk was a radical just really have no clue.

The average right-winger is already more radical than Charlie Kirk.

Remember, Trump was voted for mass deportations. The voters wanted actual roundups and concentration camps.

Kirk and Trump fell way short and wasn't even close.
"The voters" want higher wages. Some newspapers and some research says illegal migrants work for less and this pushes the average salary down and force everyone to work for the same wage or be replaced by said migrant.
"The voters" would only want roundups of pedophiles and mass murderers.

Your "average right winger" is an average joe before that. They want to feel safe and earn enough to take care of their family.

You're too deep in internet rabbit holes if you think the "average right winger" thinks like Nick Fuentes.
 
Nick Fuentes is more like a symptom of it. There's actually a lot of "ordinary looking people" who are as radical as Nick (if not more) but are just not as obvious, or not as verbally intelligent. The Republicans completely fumbling the bag as usual and not providing a candidate to represent this. Vance for example isn't just unpopular with Nick's supporters, he's just unpopular in other ways, I've seen him get dragged by rightwingers just for being fat and ugly. The psuedo-Catholicism thing Vance does isn't believable for some (the religious types), and just outright a put-off for others (the libertarian types). I think the Republicans are going to fail after Trump, Vance is just not it.

The one thing I did notice is that most of them congregate around Rush Limbough and Pat Buchanan.
vance is just very fake
 
it goes a step further than that
it's not just any political murder, but political murder against the same side that the family is on. the guy killed kirk for expressing standard conservative political positions. his family are conservatives themselves who most likely share most of kirks views.
kind of a "if you weren't my dad then i would slaughter you without a second thought, you fucking nazi!" situation.
is it safe to keep your son around your family under these circumstances?
should you go out of your way to protect and shield your son from law enforcement when he harbors such extreme hatred for you?
Well that is also true for my sovjet/third reich example, if you are just a normal average person.
It is a tough choice, do you think you can snap him out of it? Help him flee to some country with a crazy ideology he loves so much? Or turn him in and have him executed? I'm not saying there is a right answer, I'm just questioning that it is allways the right thing to turn him in.
 
A team member affiliated with the Michigan Order Network (a Republican-affiliated political organization) ordered and paid for a poster to be printed at Office Depot so he could bring it to a vigil for Charlie Kirk tonight in Michigan. When he arrived to pick it up four hours later, the employees said they refused to print it, calling the poster “propaganda.”

1.mp4
this is why DEI is so dangerous and why it should make your skin crawl when you walk into a regular, everyday business and there's nothing but browns and illegals working there

once they get the boot they will stomp you without a second thought
racial-group-rating.webp
 
So the far left is really just horseshoe turning into MAGA now doing the whole "I agree with what the terrorist did but the terrorist was actually secretly a Republican so you don't get to morally indict my side for his actions" thing. I wonder if they'll still believe this bullshit 5 years later like MAGA does with all their fairytales
 
I have just watched the governor of Utah speak on the capture of the assassin. He said officers observed discord messages (lol) that implied the guy was waiting for a drop of a "unique" rifle and scope, implying there is a larger conspiracy than simply one man's hatred for charlie kirk. Once again, I am confused as to why he brought the rifle with him in his escape. I assume just retardation, or nerves.

We will have to wait and see what the fbi can uncover with regard to supporting actors in this conspiracy. Someone supplied him with that rifle, and that was not the first shot he ever fired.
 
How common are these types of annoying progressive teachers nowadays? I don't want to be like "this is only online" but it feels like they are just a loud minority that gets a lot of attention, most teachers are usually just normie liberals
Like 90% of teachers are women, and women tend to be more liberal, so that alone means that most teachers are liberal. Add to the fact that teachers are college educated and that most rely on taxpayer dollars due to them teaching in a public school or charter school and you get one of the strongest Democrat-leaning voting blocs. As I'm a zoomer and I only graduated relatively recently, I do remember most of my teachers being outspoken libshits and I remember the somber mood in the classroom the day that Trump got elected for the first time. The entire education system is a leftist indoctrination camp and the Right wonders why they have been losing for the past 60 years or so.
 
Part of the reason they feel so threatened by someone as simple as Charlie.
More because anything but the most basic social welfare-is toxic to the public.

People might be willing to hear out government run healthcare, public trains, and compassionate care for the mentally ill.

They don’t want to hear about police abolition, trans ideology, or endless black/brown grievance. The latter not the former is the actual core of the left’s values.

The rest? Is all disposable. Of course they all know this-which is why since maybe the 70s the left and liberals have given up on a cornerstone of liberal politics-victory through persuasion.

Ask any leftist if they are fine with a generous social welfare state-even a genuinely socialist society, but trannies were gone and blacks had to sink or swim with no more handouts?

They’d take capitalist hellscape every time.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 7908479Ver archivo adjunto 7908482

this is whats tripping me up, the vagueness of it. why mention some unnamed family member stating Kirk was spreading hate, but not what Tyler thought? i feel like this has confused a lot of people who read it as though Tyler said that. and why say they discussed "why they didnt like him and the viewpoints that he had" without elaborating further? its so fucking vague and lacking information.

i know a friend of his has been interviewed and stated he has left wing views, but that seems less reliable than what the family says. why is everything from the family so cryptic? just fucking say if he was right or left wing. hopefully this is 100% clarified in coming days.
Probably they want security first so a horde of enraged redditors can't come to murder them for proving reddit wrong.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo