Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt
New thought, previous post enormous, pls no bully:
Schizo theory taken seriously and given its due [I've been waiting for this, bc it makes a lot of things add up, but there was only one rando on Xitter posting a what-if SFX video].
I've not watched it or anything, so forgive me for dismissing out of hand, but going off title alone it seems unlikely.
Who the fuck would fake their own death in front of their own young child? Even an older kid that you'd primed beforehand could easily get fucked up watching a realistic depiction of a parent dying in front of them. You'd have to be a psycho and he clearly had a great relationship with his daughter.
That's not even going into why would you do so in front of a crowd with so many uncontrollable variables, witnesses, camera angles etc. What if you failed and looked like a clown?
There are so many ways of faking your own death that wouldn't involve any of the above.
I love schizo theories, especially as they often highlight overlooked oddities, but this one seems too much of a reach.
New thought, previous post enormous, pls no bully:
Schizo theory taken seriously and given its due [I've been waiting for this, bc it makes a lot of things add up, but there was only one rando on Xitter posting a what-if SFX video]. https://youtube.com/watch?v=aVYWKdsKb1opreservetube
1. Nothing about his character seems to fit with doing something like this.
2. It doesn't seem possible to act it. No anticipation, sudden explosive reaction.
3. Would this theory say Candace is in on it? The remaining TPUSA team is too pro Israel to use the event against Israel's interest like this.
4. If it says she isn't in on it, then the leaked last chat messages don't make sense, where he is considering having her on his show.
Like I can see her being not quite bright enough to work it out, but she also is not someone with the disposition to be in on it.
So although it ties some things together, it leaves too many open ends that are incredibly difficult or even impossible.
There is no evidence of his children or wife being present. Her statement is that she was called and she didn't know how to tell their children. I forgot which news station first reported the children being present and I think JD Vance even echoed this, but nobody present has said this and Erika's statement contradict it.
This was Rob McCoy's last sermon before the murder of Charlie Kirk. 17 days before the assassination. Rob McCoy is particularly suspicious in the first place for a couple of reasons:
1. One of the most suspicious actions at the site of the assassination of Charlie Kirk was Mikey McCoy. He responded by immediately calmly walking away.
2. We can see him on video already on the phone, never taking a close look at Charlie and never being near.
3. His father Rob McCoy contradicts Mikey McCoy's statement, saying he called him and that he told him to call Erika. And also that Mikey McCoy's shirt was full of blood, which is impossible considering he never got near Charlie.
4. He also said his son was directing everything like a general, also contrary to all evidence.
5. A lot of people from TPUSA claiming Mikey McCoy was such a hero at the event, though every video we can see contradicts this.
Here's some statements from the sermon:
"This guy is problematic, a fanatic is someone that won't change the subject and can't change their mind"
(He was not talking about Charlie. He doesn't name the person, but it's someone that demands the possibility to do something like Charlie, that wants to talk to people)
"Mark those who cause division and don't have anything to do with them" (explaining romans 16-17)
"Charlie Kirk has pivoted to talk about Islam and his deaththreats have increased exponentially since that time "
6;55
But near the end is what is most compelling. His message is essentially don't look at the bad. Don't try to understand it. He goes so far as to do an imitation of the conspiracy guy, with a board with little ropes connecting dots and how we shouldn't be like him, how we shouldn't talk about this kind of thing. At the same time, he's talking about the atheist (James Lindsay) they had preach a sermon, and how he's helping to understand critical race theory and DEI, which seems to be a contradiction to me, but whatever.
"Instead of going into every alice wonderland rabbit hole, until you're up at night and you've got the whiteboard, like Glenn Beck, with yarn everywhere and you're just agitated and you gotta tell where everything is" (he mimes being agitated and crazy).
37:02
He also mentions how Charlie Kirk specifically seems to have pivoted or turned around on another issue, but I can't find the timestamp again. That's something TPUSA is now denying. I'll add it later if I can still edit this.
A sermon 4 months ago. I just wanted to get more of a baseline read on what kind of sermons he does. It's mainly sabre-rattling against Iran, and how they supposedly have a death cult leadership that might use nuclear weapons even if it leads to their own destruction because of their beliefs.
He says a lot about how Palestine doesn't have a right to exist. How disagreeing with things he said would be like denying the holocaust. And decrying antisemitism.
He keeps talking about the jews this the jews that. Says it with the silly voice as if he's saying "the joooos". He says he's taken 24 trips to Israel.
Basicly the sermon just keeps coming back to jews and how persecuted jews are, and muslims and how evil they are.
Anyone that disagrees should come on a trip to Israel with him and will also have their mind changed and if they don't want to, it's because they're hateful and they just want to hate jews.
At the end he talks about Charlie Kirk and how he's "holding onto a fragile coalition" in defense of Israel.
And he also at the end kind of condemns Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens specifically. Asking people to pray for them, because they're wrong about Israel.
I tried searching related names first and got no results, but sorry if any of this info has been posted already.
Found a gravedancer: Reggie Graham, artist at IDW Publishing that works on SEGA's Sonic the Hedgehog comic.
(BlueSky, archive)
(BlueSky profile, archive)
Unlike his pal Gigi Dutreix that got some flak on Twitter and ran to BlueSky for a while, Reggie seems to have gone completely unnoticed. Neither Reggie nor Gigi have had any public statements made or actions taken against them by either IDW or SEGA - a special Chaotix issue Reggie worked on released just last month, even.
Incidentally, both of these creatures are also known for pushing troonshit in Sonic. Gigi recommended Gender Queer: A Memoir, the book that made her poon out, in Sonic #76, and Reggie put a non-binary "they" tag into the cover of Sonic Annual 2022.
Just as a brief comment-the troon known as fujoshicel that seemed to have foreknowledge and said “another one bites the dust” That is Skyler Webster(Luke Webster)
Has removed the new phone number he created a few months ago. @healing rain-my sources cannot find any new phone number.
I got about 3/4 through it, and the weird thing that lingers in my mind is the gay men's room foot tapping reference; I'm familiar with colloquial and topical sermons, but that's simultaneously outdated as a political reference and freakishly inappropriate.
Verdict: he's weird.
One thing sticks in my mind when I see public-facing individuals who seem crazy, a little off, &c.: that's been pointed out as a sign that you're dealing with a spook. IDK why, but it's like they use quirks as cover for all the other shit they might get up to intentionally, or well-meaning observers would rather assume benign oddity than infiltration.
I got about 3/4 through it, and the weird thing that lingers in my mind is the gay men's room foot tapping reference; I'm familiar with colloquial and topical sermons, but that's simultaneously outdated as a political reference and freakishly inappropriate.
Verdict: he's weird.
One thing sticks in my mind when I see public-facing individuals who seem crazy, a little off, &c.: that's been pointed out as a sign that you're dealing with a spook. IDK why, but it's like they use quirks as cover for all the other shit they might get up to intentionally, or well-meaning observers would rather assume benign oddity than infiltration.
I'm listening to a third one now. This one again is about Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens. And of course Israel, antisemitism and nazism.
The next one on the timeline would be "the antidote to antisemitism". Sounds like it's about the same again. Does this pastor ever talk about anything else besides Jews, antisemitism, Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens?
I've been thinking about Tyler and how he can be so radicalized within a year to the point where he actually believed that killing Charlie would eliminate hate somehow.
Nothing makes sense whenever I put myself in Tyler's shoes. Through his eyes, if he were looking through Charlie's social media accounts, he would see things other than hate. Like the various posts about him interacting with his children in a loving fashion, so much so that his kids freak out and go crazy whenever they see his dad. In addition, the posts involving the debates Charlie involved himself in wasn't 100% "hate", it felt like legitimate debate.
Sure, he might of gotten something from the political views he posted about but then again, are the views really exclusive to Charlie when Donald Trump and others basically share those views?
And the thing that most dumbfounds me is... How the fuck can you believe that Charlie Kirk is the originator of hate and how the fuck can you believe that assassinating Charlie is going to eliminate all hate in the world.
I'm also going to ask how the fuck can you not think that Donald Trump is not the originator of hate?
Nothing adds up. If I were in Tyler's shoes and went through the same radicalization, I would assassinate someone with obviously more power than Charlie Kirk.
I don't know if I'm crazy or have a feeling that I'm correct but we can all agree that Charlie Kirk's life did not have to be taken away under any circumstances.
I don't know if I'm crazy or have a feeling that I'm correct but we can all agree that Charlie Kirk's life did not have to be taken away under any circumstances.
It didn't. But leftists say otherwise. And they still think they're God's gift to progressiveness. Wait, they don't believe in God unless it politically suits them. Cool to know.
They're such good people, caring for anyone but the group that gets flak for literally everything they do while their side gets away with it under the veil of democracy. I hate democracy. I hate hearing the word democracy. It's nothing but a catch-all term now. It has no meaning other than "It's automatically a GOOD thing so don't question it!!" tool for leftists.
I don't know why Tyler did it. I don't know how bad his radicalization was. Charlie's death didn't have to happen but leftists wished for it anyways. They want everyone they don't like dead. They want everyone who wants an actual honest debate with them dead. And they still insist they're in for all groups of people. But their empathy is forever suicidal and only there when it politically suits them.
I'll take being around stereotypical rednecks than leftists any day. At least talking to them about issues wouldn't put me at risk for being deplatformed or a target on me. I hope a bigger change does happen. I really do. Just something more than leftists with terrible OPSEC getting fired. I need to see this godforsaken ideology of moral superior fart huffers actually experience real, long term consequences. But for now, and for a good while in that matter, that's a long, long journey.
I've been thinking about Tyler and how he can be so radicalized within a year to the point where he actually believed that killing Charlie would eliminate hate somehow.
Nothing makes sense whenever I put myself in Tyler's shoes. Through his eyes, if he were looking through Charlie's social media accounts, he would see things other than hate. Like the various posts about him interacting with his children in a loving fashion, so much so that his kids freak out and go crazy whenever they see his dad. In addition, the posts involving the debates Charlie involved himself in wasn't 100% "hate", it felt like legitimate debate.
Sure, he might of gotten something from the political views he posted about but then again, are the views really exclusive to Charlie when Donald Trump and others basically share those views?
And the thing that most dumbfounds me is... How the fuck can you believe that Charlie Kirk is the originator of hate and how the fuck can you believe that assassinating Charlie is going to eliminate all hate in the world.
I'm also going to ask how the fuck can you not think that Donald Trump is not the originator of hate?
Nothing adds up. If I were in Tyler's shoes and went through the same radicalization, I would assassinate someone with obviously more power than Charlie Kirk.
I don't know if I'm crazy or have a feeling that I'm correct but we can all agree that Charlie Kirk's life did not have to be taken away under any circumstances.
All in all, he was a shy kid in his first real relationship. Blinded by bussy, he was eventually alone with a very mentally ill troon boyfriend and naively believed everything his boyfriend said. If he's an autist with a burning sense of justice, he could easily choose to commit a crime like the assassination of Charlie without a second thought after being convinced by bussy that Charlie was literally genociding trans folx with his hateful rhetoric.
Note: this same burning sense of justice is what Greta Thunberg autistically feels about the environment, hence the "how dare you" approach.
This utter slop appeared in my Youtube recs today, made by some dweeb that unironically calls himself a soyboy.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=gVHQCfjNoqg
It's just him kvetching about that one tired Kirk quote about black women, who cares, but I think this guy has great cow potential. He positions himself as one of those gymbro libtards a la Hasan but just comes off as someone with sexual assault allegations in his closet. Might be someone to look out for. Also lmao @ his legs.
Check me out making my own ballot and posting that homosexual shit online to show everyone how much I love communism and the possibility of getting ass raped by a 52% tax rate.
Fuckin EW! Why do men try to developed so much muscle so that they can’t even rest their arms at their sides like a normal human? It’s so gross. IMO, that look is as unattractive as a dude with a giant beer belly and skinny legs. Just no. And he probably fancies himself to be some kind of Chad. Just out there slaying all that progressive pussy.
Give me a man who builds muscle just by engaging in physical activity that requires real strength like chopping down trees or some shit. That fake muscle look is just icky. Also, there is nothing gayer than taking a selfie in a public gym. This douche bag is just an all-around faggot, isn’t he?
A bit of schadenfreude. I've said niggers can't be fired or doxed but apparently they can be driven to paranoia and threatening to shoot when their raggedy ass roach ghetto "apartments" are leaked. They're little faggots who will spend the rests of their lives scared a white guy will jump them, cheap gun in hand looking out their dirty blinds. What a bunch of fucking pussies niggers are. now they know what it is like to be a white girl taking public transport. God willing let it get worse for them.
This man has made it a career gravedancing, so him crying about it, even 2 months after the man was killed, is laughable. Granted, his engagement has declined since the first few days following Kirk’s death, but he still keeps posting the same lame nigger tier AI generated race bait.
This man has made it a career gravedancing, so him crying about it, even 2 months after the man was killed, is laughable. Granted, his engagement has declined since the first few days following Kirk’s death, but he still keeps posting the same lame nigger tier AI generated race bait.
I wonder if ChatGPT knows what he's doing, or if it would even tell him something along the lines of "I'm sorry, I can't do that, that's inappropriate," if it did.
And the thing that most dumbfounds me is... How the fuck can you believe that Charlie Kirk is the originator of hate and how the fuck can you believe that assassinating Charlie is going to eliminate all hate in the world.
I think one of the reasons is because we aren't getting more official information. Lance still gone. No autopsy report. Nothing more about motive. The only new information is from people like Candace.
Here's an exhaustive forensic examination of the official assassination story and why it doesn't make sense:
What's unusual and good about this one is that it clearly presents the evidence and sources.
Nothing adds up. If I were in Tyler's shoes and went through the same radicalization, I would assassinate someone with obviously more power than Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk was obviously an easier target since everyone else had secured up especially after Trump got shot at (Steven Crowder has to hire security, and he came to that conclusion long before). Charlie I think had some security, just not enough of it.
And to paraphrase Crowder, how interesting that conservative/right-leaning/centrist people have to protect themselves going to public spaces like colleges but the left doesn't need to. And you still don't hear of far-right extremists shooting up places despite MSM trying to propagandize them into doing it. Was talking to a friend yesterday and this got brought up briefly, and I told him the left is real mad that no one on the right rioted over Charlie's death. The only time someone on the right snapped and committed an actual hate crime was when some veteran shot up and burned down an LDS church near the end of September because of the false narrative the Mormons were behind the assassination due to the fact it happened in Utah, and even then that's still a weak thread to link and could've just been a terribly-timed coincidence. Also it's since gotten memory-holed because things got resolved on that end, although some LDS church attendance has dropped because there're members scared they could be next.
If there's anything the left's been good at doing, it's causing fear, and that's ultimately led to people literally being killed in the name of fear. Tyler caused fear in the name of bussy because his boyfriend was fearful from the indoctrination of how he's going to be put into camps and genocided for being a troon. Thomas Crooks wanted to cause fear in killing Trump because he was brainwashed by the Indoctrination of him being a "threat to our democracy", and he thankfully failed (still sadly took someone down with him), or at least it's been delayed. Troons are shooting up schools because they're nihilistic zealots and want to kill children through any means necessary, and who the fuck knows what that fear they've implanted into the young generation is going to do.
That's the main goal, and it's unfortunately working until the radical left gets what they want, which at this point is proving to be complete annihilation of their opposition. Charlie is just one of many messages they've been sending to us, that they're coming for you, and what are you going to do about it?
They want you to fight back so they can scream oppression, and all of those Charlie vigils wasn't what they wanted. Which means that's the correct answer: making them shit themselves with rage.
There is nothing to add up. You cannot rationalize the thoughts of someone who is mentally ill. That is why they are called mentally ill.
I hate to say, "it's as simple as that", but there is no real point to try and make sense of it because any which way you try to cut his reasoning it'll just sound gay and retarded, and it's simply because he is a gay retard. That's the measure of a person we're dealing with. To pretend he is anything but that is just an exercise in futility.
