- Registrado
- 29 de Jun, 2021
Canada and Europe have more to gain from Kirk dying than Israel ever had.
Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt
- Iniciador del tema Amelia Troonheart
- Fecha de inicio
-
🚨 On-and-off DDoS attacks. (July 25th: On-going connection issues.)
🧅 Tor is stable: https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion/ -
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Registrado
- 7 de Ago, 2024
Your mistake is assuming they believe in anything they say. If I mock Allah, or tell followers of the warlord pedophile Muhammad that they will spend eternity in Jahannam, that doesn't mean I believe in these things. All it means is I know enough about their beliefs to mock them in their own language.
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 15 de Dic, 2022
Tyler Robinson's neighbor did an interview and said she did not recognize him from the circulated picture
orangecat
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 27 de Jun, 2024
Listened to the video and don't think this neighbor's opinion really matters at all. She barely knew him. I'm all for being skeptical but am not convinced by most of the evidence presented.
1. The lady vaguely knew of him, so it's not like he's going to share secrets about his gay partner and his intention to kill with her. People still can't comprehend that everyone acts normal in public and keeps private stuff private. Same applies to the grandma. Most grandkids aren't telling their grandparents about their insane politics.
2. "I can't believe he would make such a difficult shot." I've seen a lot of people claim the shot wasn't that difficult.
3. "How did the parents recognize their son instantly in the picture but the neighbor didn't?" Probably because the neighbor barely knew him. I would trust the people who raised him a little more. I'm all for being skeptical but this isn't evidence.
4. The ear lobe attachment is interesting.
5. "The shoes in the photos are not the same! This is proof!" Man's acting like you can't have more than one pair of shoes.
I wish the skeptics would focus on actually compelling evidence because stuff like this just makes them look like insane conspiracy theorists.
Sneedifarms
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 24 de Mayo, 2022
If my nextdoor neighbor shot Trump tomorrow, I wouldn't even recognize them on national TV.
Mayoush
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 12 de Mayo, 2024
Yeah I know but there are some vile ppl constantly making fun of him, since he died I swear every single day it’s like they are obsessed with his death.
But outside of the chronically online ppl I think a lot more ppl liked him, even some left leaning celebrities felt sad for him and even mourned him.
I wasn’t a big follower of his but I knew him and his content and now I can say he had a big impact on the right, I got the news instantly when he was shot and from the footage I knew he was a goner, I would say his death impacted me since he just wanted to debate ppl and find common ground and I consider him a moderate.
I also do think his death will have a big impact later on, especially since the left won’t apologize or try to hide their murderous intent but I don’t want a real massive bloody conflict.
I think it is better just to block the trolls and move on but when you see constantly ppl making fun of him and getting 300k+ likes, you lose faith in unity and humanity.
- Registrado
- 17 de Dic, 2019
He's in modern leftist hell.
Which isn't an actual place, it just means going down in history and being remembered as one of the Bad Guys (TM)!
Which isn't an actual place, it just means going down in history and being remembered as one of the Bad Guys (TM)!
- Registrado
- 15 de Dic, 2022
I agree, just like the things his grandmother said weren't helpful. I'm sharing all details I find. Some eliminate conspiracy theories, some support some.
Sometimes it's a pain to find the original video some rando comments on, so I link the commentor's video.
He's obviously not a sharp commentor, because his parents didn't recognize hjm instantly. The statement goes that his mother said she thought he kinda looked like him and then asked her husband if he agreed.
You're wrong about it being evidence, it is evidence. What it isn't is proof. The fact that a whole group of people keep highlighting Mikey McCoy and saying he was a hero. His father saying he was covered in blood. And then when you see the video he was instead immediately calmly walking away, while other people either ran, or froze or went to Charlie. He was never near Charlie. Didn't check on him. Was on the phone as it happened and stayed on the phone. According to his own statement he called Erika, which is probably true.
That is evidence too. It's not proof of anything conclusively. When someone doesn't tell the truth in events like this, it isn't proof they're involved somehow, like the neighbour said some things that probably weren't true. You need all the details to get a full picture.
----
Max Blumenthal has done some interesting videos on Charlie Kirk. He's done some investigating in regard to what donors Kirk was having trouble with, with some apparently cursing him at events where Kirk wasn't present.
Here he talks about the fact that Netanyahu twice denied involvement and why that is notable:
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 6 de Abr, 2022
I mean, yeah, by your admission, all that stuff is academic masturbation.
It's all a bunch of word salad and walls of text to obfuscate the obvious differences between right and wrong and to justify their own mediocrity and sociopathy and degeneracy.
The differences really are superficial and irrelevant as far as most of us are concerned. Can you really blame us for not only failing to understand the differences, but for not even giving a shit about the differences, especially when they overlap so much?
Última edición:
KTA
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 8 de Oct, 2025
You didn't understood a word I wrote, and seemingly believe yourself to be the sole bearer of the only true universal collective moral. You are a solipsistic mind, that's a biological reality. Your individual perception of reality and your individual conceptualization of that perception is unique, your solipsistic epistemological model based on whatever ontology you believe in - and yes in your idiosyncratic model there are truth tables with true and false, right and wrong, objective reality according to the epistemological model you derived from your perception and conception of reality over time, your individual ontology.
That doesn't imply that these are universal collective objective truth tables are applicable to anybody but yourself; that's the conceptual mistake every collectivist does, no matter if material or idealistic.
No, they are not. Its a giant difference and has different implications for the behavior of the respective individual if somebody believes that every epistemic model about morals is equal, the relativist or if there are many and assigns different valuations to them like the nihilist or if there is one collective universal "true" model like the collectivist.
I don't blame you, I recognize what you are, a universal collectivist, contrary to a nominalist pragmatist. Unfortunately you represent the majority and are the falsification in flesh of the classic liberal moral assumption, that with more individualism the human mind is going to become more understandable of differences in other solipsistic minds. The contrary seems to be the case. More individualism, more universal collectivistic fanatism by ironically atomized individuals.
One of the reasons why a nominalist like myself, same as Evola and Peter Thiel believes that the original Christian epistemological model on morals contrary to the fanatistic one is the best humans have developed until now for coming to pragmatic solutions of individuals living in groups of solipsistic minds.
And yes, its again academic masturbation, as in the actual every day reality of interactions of individuals the neo-marxist unfortunately have a point - the winner is going to be the one with the biggest stick.
- Registrado
- 18 de Dic, 2019
Getting 300k likes on any platform is grifters using bots to push their content to front pages. Its also how the political parties have tried forcing consensus on the people the last few years.
So don't put much stock in it.
- Registrado
- 15 de Dic, 2022
This interview doesn't cover anything new, but it's a good easy to digest recap for anyone who hasn't been keeping up with every development about the Charlie Kirk whodunnit case:
If you don't know much, watch this to get up to speed.
One fact I think almost nobody in this thread (including myself) seem to have missed is that he didn't really just turn himself in: the authorities sent him a message to immediately turn himself in or they would break down any door in between. (30 minute mark).
If you don't know much, watch this to get up to speed.
One fact I think almost nobody in this thread (including myself) seem to have missed is that he didn't really just turn himself in: the authorities sent him a message to immediately turn himself in or they would break down any door in between. (30 minute mark).
Última edición:
Sekirodiealot
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 18 de Dic, 2019
I love it when leftist use that specific charlie kirk quote to justify gun control and his murder.
- Registrado
- 15 de Dic, 2022
Josh Hammer did an interview about the thing.
His last words were interesting.
"Was he suddenly becoming a Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, like ultra conspiracy theorist? No. On the contrary, even in his final months, including at the final TPUSA conference I did with him on stage at the ... summit in July, He said over and over and over again "Do not succumb to the mind virus. Do not let your brain rot get to the point where you're just hating on the jews. He said that on stage, with me sitting 2 feet away from him. He kept that thought in mind until the very day he died."
Now that last bit is not something anyone can know, which suggests to me it's an exaggerated lie. The comments are completely against him, which is notable, because so far every video the comments have been in favor of whatever side was talking in the video. This suggests to me that there's a shift in public opinion.
---
edit:
oh it's an organized media blitz. Frank Turek also gave a new interview with the same interviewer:
He's addressing the conspiracy there was about him giving hand signals and how stupid that idea was.
Later when he's talking about Candace specifically in the middle he goes "Maybe she's right, but not everything has evidence behind them. And what people don't seem to understand [..] how prosecution works. How murder cases work."
He's also denying that Charlie was getting closer to Catholicism,
His last words were interesting.
"Was he suddenly becoming a Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, like ultra conspiracy theorist? No. On the contrary, even in his final months, including at the final TPUSA conference I did with him on stage at the ... summit in July, He said over and over and over again "Do not succumb to the mind virus. Do not let your brain rot get to the point where you're just hating on the jews. He said that on stage, with me sitting 2 feet away from him. He kept that thought in mind until the very day he died."
Now that last bit is not something anyone can know, which suggests to me it's an exaggerated lie. The comments are completely against him, which is notable, because so far every video the comments have been in favor of whatever side was talking in the video. This suggests to me that there's a shift in public opinion.
---
edit:
oh it's an organized media blitz. Frank Turek also gave a new interview with the same interviewer:
He's addressing the conspiracy there was about him giving hand signals and how stupid that idea was.
Later when he's talking about Candace specifically in the middle he goes "Maybe she's right, but not everything has evidence behind them. And what people don't seem to understand [..] how prosecution works. How murder cases work."
He's also denying that Charlie was getting closer to Catholicism,
Última edición:
- Registrado
- 2 de Mar, 2025
This utter slop appeared in my Youtube recs today, made by some dweeb that unironically calls himself a soyboy.
It's just him kvetching about that one tired Kirk quote about black women, who cares, but I think this guy has great cow potential. He positions himself as one of those gymbro libtards a la Hasan but just comes off as someone with sexual assault allegations in his closet. Might be someone to look out for. Also lmao @ his legs.
It's just him kvetching about that one tired Kirk quote about black women, who cares, but I think this guy has great cow potential. He positions himself as one of those gymbro libtards a la Hasan but just comes off as someone with sexual assault allegations in his closet. Might be someone to look out for. Also lmao @ his legs.
E. Knee as Weapon - Cont.
kiwifarms.net
- Registrado
- 14 de Oct, 2017
Does anyone have a copy of the shooting? I'm arguing with someone who's insisting there's no blood and I can't find it through traditional means.
I remember Budd Dwyer levels of blood.
I remember Budd Dwyer levels of blood.
- Registrado
- 25 de Mar, 2024
It's in the OP of the original thread behind a spoiler. And you remember correctly, for the record.
NEW DISCUSSION THREAD
article/archive
This is a breaking news story and will be updated.
Charlie Kirk was shot at an event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah on Wednesday.
Bystanders report seeing Kirk shot near his neck during a Q&A with students.
A suspect is in custody, according to a UVU alert sent to students. The campus is on lockdown.
Charlie Kirk has allegedly been shot in the neck during a Utah Valley University event. Retrieving links now.
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1965843808475820324
Reacciones:
x 137 x 44 x 13 x 20 x 6 x 2 x 1 x 1 x 186 x 2 x 1 x 1
x 137 x 44 x 13 x 20 x 6 x 2 x 1 x 1 x 186 x 2 x 1 x 1
- Registrado
- 15 de Dic, 2022
A collection of eye witness accounts.
Interesting is that in the whole collection there is only a single college student. So far the rest have been parents and children.
Interesting is that in the whole collection there is only a single college student. So far the rest have been parents and children.
- Registrado
- 13 de Dic, 2022