Authored by Lee Friday via The Mises Institute,
Canadians are heading to the polls on September 20, and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s questionable ethics are under a microscope, with Chris Selley of the
National Post suggesting that Canadians “could do a lot worse than choosing whichever leader they judge the most eager and likely to govern with integrity.”
Okay, I’ll bite. Let’s assess the eagerness and integrity of the leaders of the three main political parties:
- Justin Trudeau – Liberal Party
- Erin O’Toole – Conservative Party (farther to the left than US Democrats)
- Jagmeet Singh – New Democratic Party
There is no doubt that all three of them are very eager to govern, so eagerness is not an issue.
But What About Integrity?
A person of integrity does not break promises, but Trudeau has
broken many promises.
A person of integrity is not a hypocrite, but Singh
violates covid protocols that he professes to support. He also criticized Trudeau for calling an election during a pandemic, yet he
enthusiastically campaigned for his NDP colleagues when they called an election in British Columbia last fall.
A person of integrity does not change his policies when it is politically expedient to do so. But O’Toole has reversed himself on
gun control, as well as access to
abortion and MAID (medical assistance in dying).
All three candidates are guilty of other transgressions, too numerous to list.
Selley writes “O’Toole insists he has lived his life as a principled man, and would hold himself to those same principles as prime minister.” However, a principle,
by definition, is not open to compromise, and Selley ignores the flipflops of his favoured candidate. Thus, Selley himself lacks the integrity he is seeking to promote.
Is Political Integrity Even Possible?
The lack of political integrity is a standard feature of democracy, not a flaw. This is because politicians are not, in any meaningful way, held
accountable for their actions, so they make and break promises at will. Their actions become arbitrary, allowing them to serve whichever interest groups they please, which means that regular citizens – regardless of election outcomes –
have virtually no influence on government policy.
Does this mean that all politicians lack integrity? No, but they are few in number, because human nature dictates that the lack of accountability will be a magnet for those who
lack integrity. Furthermore, people with integrity do not usually want to surround themselves with people (other politicians) who lack integrity. This paves the way for a large degree of immoral uniformity within the political class. As F.A. Hayek wrote in his book
The Road to Serfdom, in a chapter titled
Why the Worst Get on Top:
“[T]he higher the education and intelligence of individuals become, the more their tastes and views are differentiated. If we wish to find a high degree of uniformity in outlook, we have to descend to the regions of lower moral and intellectual standards where the more primitive instincts prevail. This does not mean that the majority of people have low moral standards; it merely means that the largest group of people whose values are very similar are the people with low standards.”
Low moral standards. Hayek is referring to people like Trudeau, O’Toole, Singh, and others of their ilk in the political class. That is why Canadian voters will not find integrity on the ballot.