US California Eyes Data Center Plan To Help Fund High Speed Rail

CAHSR2.jpg.webp
California’s long-awaited high-speed rail project may be being repositioned as a data center corridor, with revenue from the infrastructure seen as a way to help fund a project that has struggled to secure enough public money.

Why It Matters

The publicly funded high-speed rail project aims to carry passengers between Los Angeles and San Francisco at speeds of up to 220 mph, but it has faced years of delays, funding gaps and escalating costs. Approved by voters in 2008 with an expected 2020 completion date, the project remains unfinished.

What To Know

“The Authority is advancing an asset commercialization strategy to develop energy and technology projects along the high-speed rail right-of-way and on surplus land,” a 2026 revised draft business plan from the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) read.

“By leveraging state-owned land for commercial development such as solar farms, battery storage, data centers, and fiber optic and transmission lines, the Authority can create new business income sources before operations, while also benefiting communities along the corridor.”

The document went on to say that analysis “revealed several complementary opportunities, particularly in areas such as renewable energy and technology infrastructure. For example, solar farms and data centers could leverage high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission and technology corridors, creating a multiplier effect on investment returns and operational efficiency.”

Newsweek contacted CHSRA for comment via email.

As reported by The San Francisco Chronicle, the strategy has raised concerns among some, including Visalia resident Joseph Mello, who said he reviewed the plans and addressed the board on June 1, the day of their approval.

“As a potential rail user,” Mello said, per the outlet, “I do not want to ride through a valley of data centers.” Public comment at the June 1 board meeting focused heavily on data centers and high-speed rail, with concerns over water use, pollution, noise, fire risk and impacts on farmland—echoing opposition seen in towns nationwide, it added.

High-Speed Rail CEO on Transparency Concerns

In a recent interview with local station KRCA 3, California High-Speed Rail CEO Ian Choudri addressed transparency concerns surrounding the project, saying he would be “more than happy” to discuss details of the high-speed rail project that people may feel are lacking.

"We improve every day," Choudri said. "We have improved the entire design concepts, we have improved the way we are going to deliver. If there is someone who comes and says 'hey, this is the information we're looking for and you guys aren't providing it,' I would like to know."

"Everything we do, every penny we spend is posted on our website," Choudri said, per KRCA 3. "I tell my team to provide as much information as we can."

Choudri also acknowledged the importance of transparency on the project, given its past challenges, including delays and rising costs.

"My goal really is to let the public see we can build it," Choudri said. "If we talk more to the people and let them understand what happened and what happens next, then I think public support will continue."

He added that the project would mark the first high-speed rail system in the Western Hemisphere, noting that China has been able to advance its own network more quickly because it does not face the same federal and state regulatory hurdles, according to KRCA 3.

"They just blow and go," Choudri said.

California Governor Candidates on High-Speed Rail Project

California gubernatorial hopefuls have also addressed concerns surrounding the high-profile project.

Democrat Xavier Becerra said he would overhaul the current plan to ensure the project is completed on schedule.

"I'm going to scrap the current configuration, and I'm going to make sure we finish," Becerra told voters in Fresno last month, as reported by Fox 26 News. "But we've got to do it on budget and on time."
A Becerra campaign spokesperson told Newsweek: "Nearly 80 miles of guideway are complete. The bridges, viaducts, and overpasses are built. The infrastructure is in the ground, and the track is coming. Secretary Becerra is now focused on making sure nothing slows what comes next—cutting through every bottleneck, every broken approval chain, every delay that has held this project back."

Meanwhile, Republican candidate Steve Hilton told Fox Business earlier this month that the project “doesn’t meet the standards of the law” and would instead spend money on alternative infrastructure projects.
TLDR: CAHSR wasted billions and now wants to utilize the electrical infrastructure on the planned corridor to attract data centers and have the tax revenue go to the project or something
 
I actually think it's a great idea. Think of all the jobs we'll create manually transporting data between the data centers on the high-speed rail.
 
Isn't California running out of water cause of all their almond and avocado farms and that they have to siphon water from Lake Mead in Nevada? Why do they insist on every single suicidal decision in that dogshit state.
 
Haven't people been throwing money at this high speed rail for decades? Where did that tax payer money go and why has nothing really been built?
Insert .gif of Gavin doing the coke wiggle while talking about how investors are stoked about the Palisades fire.
 
Haven't people been throwing money at this high speed rail for decades? Where did that tax payer money go and why has nothing really been built?

There was never any intention to build high-speed rail in California. All the money raised for high-speed rail has been spent on regular rail infrastructure projects across California. High speed rail became a sort of slush-fund that anyone who wanted to to rail improvement projects in the LA or San Francisco metro areas could dip into and spend from.

They are now promising to build a high-speed rail system from the middle of nowhere to the middle of nowhere. A ticket would cost more than air travel and be far slower than air travel. They have not even actually aquired the land or even done final planning to create high speed rail that would actually go from LA to San Francisco.

What this particular exercise is about is selling all the surplus property the state bought for massive amounts of money along the high-speed railroad route back off into the private sector at a very low price.

Stealing someone's land out from under them is a process.

And now the state is going to sell off the land that really didn't need in the first place and they stole to new private owners. Circle of life I guess.
 
Holy shit 'data center' has become the catchall boogieman of 2026.


Would it be better if they were just factories? Or wafer fabs? This has turned into flat out mass hysteria now. Did you know half of Europe is dying from heat and no AC? 'As long as there's no data centers everything is great'.
does california have the electric grid to support the datacenters?

No one is building data centers in California because they have the most expensive electricity in the country.
tax incentives and utility negotiations will pass the buck on the locals.

the bigger issue is that this bullshit has to connect to existing metrolink and freight lines which defeats the purpose of a high speed rail. at that point, upgrading the existing railway would've been a better use of money.
 
I feel like everyone's question is "How are you almost a decade late with virtually nothing to show for it" and "where did $200,000,000,000 disappear to" and there's no answer to it.
Haven't people been throwing money at this high speed rail for decades? Where did that tax payer money go and why has nothing really been built?
At least 30% of the 15 billion CAHSR has spent so far has gone towards their legal team and fraudsters private contractors. The rest has been spent on acquiring properties and grade separating the planned IOS which requires building temporary roads while they construct under and overpasses.
Realistically the entire IOS should've cost no more than 14.1 billion dollars ($80,000,000 per mile average) due to the fact that it's almost entirely situated in rural areas. The current projected cost per mile for the IOS is over $200,000,000 and will likely go up to $300,000,000 at the current rate. Completing the damn thing currently is gonna cost almost $40 billion.
 
Última edición:
he bigger issue is that this bullshit has to connect to existing metrolink and freight lines which defeats the purpose of a high speed rail. at that point, upgrading the existing railway would've been a better use of money.

In a real way, that is alot of what they actually did with the money. They have vastly improved the existing non-passenger railway going north-south in California.
 
There was never any intention to build high-speed rail in California. All the money raised for high-speed rail has been spent on regular rail infrastructure projects across California. High speed rail became a sort of slush-fund that anyone who wanted to to rail improvement projects in the LA or San Francisco metro areas could dip into and spend from.
For example: Caltrain got the $2.4 billion needed to electrify the corridor because CAHSR plans to use it.
the bigger issue is that this bullshit has to connect to existing metrolink and freight lines which defeats the purpose of a high speed rail. at that point, upgrading the existing railway would've been a better use of money.
Truth nuke.
When I first heard about California HSR I thought they'd design it more like the Acela because that's the only type of HSR we have in the US. Modern Acelas are specifically designed to handle sharp curves incredibly well because it has to operate on a legacy corridor that hasn't been properly updated ever and so using it on a rail right of way that is at least 80% poker straight just makes sense and saves tons of money. The biggest expense would've been the electrification.
 
Many of the Californian pols involved with the great high speed train from Fresno to Bakersfield (lol) are gone from active politics.

This has allowed current Californian politicians to simply just casually hand wave all complaints of waste and failure away. Its simply staggering how effective ignoring this albatross of corruption has been.

The corollary to "you can just do things" must be that "you can just ignore all demands of accountability."
 
Haven't people been throwing money at this high speed rail for decades? Where did that tax payer money go and why has nothing really been built?

It was stolen by consultants and other cronies and pissed away on useless yet expensive studies, like every government project.

It was never about building highspeed rail. Building railways is actually a rather simple affair if you have the political will to do so. They have no intention of ever building the railway it's just a money sink to funnel slush funds to political allies and friends of the Democratic Party.
 
Holy shit 'data center' has become the catchall boogieman of 2026.


Would it be better if they were just factories? Or wafer fabs? This has turned into flat out mass hysteria now. Did you know half of Europe is dying from heat and no AC? 'As long as there's no data centers everything is great'.
Good thing the central valley and I5 don't have any such eyesores...
Screenshots_2026-06-29-11-49-05.png

Totally different from a datacenter, guys.

And "valley of datacenters..." like they're just going to be lined up end to end for hundreds of miles.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo