US California Eyes Data Center Plan To Help Fund High Speed Rail

CAHSR2.jpg.webp
California’s long-awaited high-speed rail project may be being repositioned as a data center corridor, with revenue from the infrastructure seen as a way to help fund a project that has struggled to secure enough public money.

Why It Matters

The publicly funded high-speed rail project aims to carry passengers between Los Angeles and San Francisco at speeds of up to 220 mph, but it has faced years of delays, funding gaps and escalating costs. Approved by voters in 2008 with an expected 2020 completion date, the project remains unfinished.

What To Know

“The Authority is advancing an asset commercialization strategy to develop energy and technology projects along the high-speed rail right-of-way and on surplus land,” a 2026 revised draft business plan from the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) read.

“By leveraging state-owned land for commercial development such as solar farms, battery storage, data centers, and fiber optic and transmission lines, the Authority can create new business income sources before operations, while also benefiting communities along the corridor.”

The document went on to say that analysis “revealed several complementary opportunities, particularly in areas such as renewable energy and technology infrastructure. For example, solar farms and data centers could leverage high voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission and technology corridors, creating a multiplier effect on investment returns and operational efficiency.”

Newsweek contacted CHSRA for comment via email.

As reported by The San Francisco Chronicle, the strategy has raised concerns among some, including Visalia resident Joseph Mello, who said he reviewed the plans and addressed the board on June 1, the day of their approval.

“As a potential rail user,” Mello said, per the outlet, “I do not want to ride through a valley of data centers.” Public comment at the June 1 board meeting focused heavily on data centers and high-speed rail, with concerns over water use, pollution, noise, fire risk and impacts on farmland—echoing opposition seen in towns nationwide, it added.

High-Speed Rail CEO on Transparency Concerns

In a recent interview with local station KRCA 3, California High-Speed Rail CEO Ian Choudri addressed transparency concerns surrounding the project, saying he would be “more than happy” to discuss details of the high-speed rail project that people may feel are lacking.

"We improve every day," Choudri said. "We have improved the entire design concepts, we have improved the way we are going to deliver. If there is someone who comes and says 'hey, this is the information we're looking for and you guys aren't providing it,' I would like to know."

"Everything we do, every penny we spend is posted on our website," Choudri said, per KRCA 3. "I tell my team to provide as much information as we can."

Choudri also acknowledged the importance of transparency on the project, given its past challenges, including delays and rising costs.

"My goal really is to let the public see we can build it," Choudri said. "If we talk more to the people and let them understand what happened and what happens next, then I think public support will continue."

He added that the project would mark the first high-speed rail system in the Western Hemisphere, noting that China has been able to advance its own network more quickly because it does not face the same federal and state regulatory hurdles, according to KRCA 3.

"They just blow and go," Choudri said.

California Governor Candidates on High-Speed Rail Project

California gubernatorial hopefuls have also addressed concerns surrounding the high-profile project.

Democrat Xavier Becerra said he would overhaul the current plan to ensure the project is completed on schedule.

"I'm going to scrap the current configuration, and I'm going to make sure we finish," Becerra told voters in Fresno last month, as reported by Fox 26 News. "But we've got to do it on budget and on time."
A Becerra campaign spokesperson told Newsweek: "Nearly 80 miles of guideway are complete. The bridges, viaducts, and overpasses are built. The infrastructure is in the ground, and the track is coming. Secretary Becerra is now focused on making sure nothing slows what comes next—cutting through every bottleneck, every broken approval chain, every delay that has held this project back."

Meanwhile, Republican candidate Steve Hilton told Fox Business earlier this month that the project “doesn’t meet the standards of the law” and would instead spend money on alternative infrastructure projects.
TLDR: CAHSR wasted billions and now wants to utilize the electrical infrastructure on the planned corridor to attract data centers and have the tax revenue go to the project or something
 
Holy shit 'data center' has become the catchall boogieman of 2026.

“As a potential rail user,” Mello said, per the outlet, “I do not want to ride through a valley of data centers.”
Would it be better if they were just factories? Or wafer fabs? This has turned into flat out mass hysteria now. Did you know half of Europe is dying from heat and no AC? 'As long as there's no data centers everything is great'.
 
No one is building data centers in California because they have the most expensive electricity in the country.
The general idea seems to be that it'd somehow be cheaper to get electricity from the substations dotted along the corridor rather than from the regular electrical grid. I don't really see how that math works out but there was a separate article about building solar farms across the entire corridor so I guess they might use those for the data centers. The main problem is that those substations would need to get upscaled significantly if they wanna be feeding power to both high speed trains and data centers which just makes the project more expensive than it already is.
Would it be better if they were just factories? Or wafer fabs? This has turned into flat out mass hysteria now. Did you know half of Europe is dying from heat and no AC? 'As long as there's no data centers everything is great'.
Why do people act like a data center is gonna make a literal desert any more undesirable.
 
Última edición:
How are they going to manage that?

My understanding is that California has regular blackouts\brownouts because they can't generate enough power to supply what they currently have.

Add datacentres and high speed rail to that undersized power supply and it's going to be ridiculous.

They'd be far better off solving their existing infrastructure problems than investing money and creating bigger ones.
 
"We improve every day," Choudri said. "We have improved the entire design concepts, we have improved the way we are going to deliver. If there is someone who comes and says 'hey, this is the information we're looking for and you guys aren't providing it,' I would like to know."
I feel like everyone's question is "How are you almost a decade late with virtually nothing to show for it" and "where did $200,000,000,000 disappear to" and there's no answer to it.
 
Holy shit 'data center' has become the catchall boogieman of 2026.


Would it be better if they were just factories? Or wafer fabs? This has turned into flat out mass hysteria now. Did you know half of Europe is dying from heat and no AC? 'As long as there's no data centers everything is great'.
No it needs to be endless encampments of "diverse" unhoused.
 
How are they going to manage that?

My understanding is that California has regular blackouts\brownouts because they can't generate enough power to supply what they currently have.

Add datacentres and high speed rail to that undersized power supply and it's going to be ridiculous.

They'd be far better off solving their existing infrastructure problems than investing money and creating bigger ones.
This operates under the very mistaken assumption that PG&E exists to provide electric power to those greenhouse-producing proles who dare to grill meat and air condition their homes, and not as a jobs program for California's endless useless credentialed bureaucrats, their low-skill immigrants, and to manufacture more pretexts to extract wealth from the average Californian to throw into government programs.
The data centers will get their power, they're part of the tribe. Who gives a shit about more brownouts for people in the interior who haven't figured out to just become urban bugmen yet?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo