UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679 (https://archive.ph/5Ba6o)

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk
https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png


7
10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See spread happiness's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton
https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary

42
10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019
See pg often's other Tweets
Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I think we should just enlist every small boat paki that comes onshore, "Oh, you want to stay here, then you need to serve at least 2-5 years in the army", because I don't trust them touching our ships or aircraft, or just use them as ammunition. Might be a good deterrent for people to stop coming here, probs not.
 
I think we should just enlist every small boat paki that comes onshore, "Oh, you want to stay here, then you need to serve at least 2-5 years in the army", because I don't trust them touching our ships or aircraft, or just use them as ammunition. Might be a good deterrent for people to stop coming here, probs not.
I get what you’re saying and I support it to an extent, but at the same time teaching a bunch of 60IQ sub-Saharans small unit tactics seems like the thing that would end up biting you in the arse down the road.
Have them dig draining ditches for 5 years instead (but they’d probably bollock that up as well).
 
I get what you’re saying and I support it to an extent, but at the same time teaching a bunch of 60IQ sub-Saharans small unit tactics seems like the thing that would end up biting you in the arse down the road.
Have them dig draining ditches for 5 years instead (but they’d probably bollock that up as well).
You are aware that the UK govt. made a deal with Nigeria to offer British citizenship in exchange for Nigerian men joining the British army?

Is there anything more iconic than despots hiring foreign mercenaries to suppress the native population?
 
there anything more iconic than despots hiring foreign mercenaries to suppress the native population
Hence tyrants are always fond of bad men, because they love to be flattered, but no man who has the spirit of a freeman in him will lower himself by flattery; good men love others, or at any rate do not flatter them. Moreover, the bad are useful for bad purposes; 'nail knocks out nail,' as the proverb says. It is characteristic of a tyrant to dislike every one who has dignity or independence; he wants to be alone in his glory, but any one who claims a like dignity or asserts his independence encroaches upon his prerogative, and is hated by him as an enemy to his power. Another mark of a tyrant is that he likes foreigners better than citizens, and lives with them and invites them to his table; for the one are enemies, but the Others enter into no rivalry with him.
Aristotle: politics (book five I think, do t quote me.)
 
Communist rag The Canary has been de-banked by Lloyds (X), weeks after officially going to print. They had previously denied that 'cancel culture' and political debanking existed. Article from their website (X)
Ver archivo adjunto 9212913

Ver archivo adjunto 9212911
Considering this very website was going through the same issues with payment providers, its not a good thing for banks and financial institutions to be able to try and indirectly silence media because they dont align with it politically

Also Charlie Veitch has been told to fuck off from Manchester by the courts
 
As for his social housing plan, it will never happen for a few reasons
Burnham's housing plans are likely tied into his personal retirement. He and others in Labour are pushing for charities and NGOs to be come slum landlords, though the slum part won't be said aloud.

By ensuring these organisations only provide housing to minority groups of one kind or another they can funnel social housing into these organisations and keep them away from the natives without it seeming as obvious on paper. It also provides an excuse to channel even more tax payer money into organisations dedicated to the destruction of the country.
 
Plenty of women with overly liberal husbands.
Can confirm. Ask me how I know. :\

On the one hand, he without question knows TWAM and they WNBAW.

On the other, he malded at me when I very reasonably pointed out that Destiny is a literal cuck who blew Nick Fuentes and will never, ever not explode in rage at the suggestion that Covid maybe didn’t have a natural origin.

What about people who are several generations in the UK/Europe? Or those who have one ethnic British parent? If it's all they've ever known, they are largely going to be committed to the UK as their home too. And if it's half their ethnic heritage, they absolutely will.

In the US, the half breed children of imports (including imports from prior centuries) never feel whites are part of their ethnic heritage even when it’s clear as the light skin on their face. They certainly want to stay for financial and not getting raped and murdered in the shithole that exported their parents reasons, but they hate America and do not consider themselves anything but the non white half. So you’re saying your half breed children of imports recognize their white half? Bonkers, never seen such a thing in the US.
 
So you’re saying your half breed children of imports recognize their white half?
They don't, and it's absurd to even try and claim they do. Some very, very, very few of them do for sure, but the majority actively distance themselves from it. Any half breed mutt is only saying they are white, as a tactic. Not because they have any real kinship.
 
Considering this very website was going through the same issues with payment providers, its not a good thing for banks and financial institutions to be able to try and indirectly silence media because they dont align with it politically
Of course it’s not, but it’s the canary so it’s funny.
Nobody should be getting debanked for political reasons, but I would still chuckle and rub it in their faces.
 
People are slaves to the legislation. They often don't question it.
I've seen this both professionally and personally
Anyone who is autistic enough to make a decision like this in the current political climate should not be in a decision-making role. I'm not interested in "but the rule of law is paramount, hehe ☝️🤓" cope because the rule of law does not exist when it comes to punishing brown invaders for destroying the lives of natives or when it comes to dealing with Whites who express dissent about their destruction.

In any sane world, this statement would be followed by "because if we do, he may go on to harm more children in his country of origin. As a result, we have made the decision to publicly hang him to dissuade others from following in his footsteps."
At this point I genuinely do not care what any foreigner might do if he was sent back to the shithole he came from. Rape, murder, molestation, abuse: have at it pal, it's none of my business. "He's a danger to other people so let's keep him here to terrorise our own population and protect some fucking randoms who live thousands of miles away and hate us" is the most hateful retarded shit ever.
 
Communist rag The Canary has been de-banked by Lloyds (X), weeks after officially going to print. They had previously denied that 'cancel culture' and political debanking existed. Article from their website (X)
Ver archivo adjunto 9212913

Ver archivo adjunto 9212911
The replies are nothing but people calling them out for their previous take. I wonder if they're on blue sky (not enough to look at blue sky, or learn whether it's actually styled as bluesky)
 
I think we should just enlist every small boat paki that comes onshore, "Oh, you want to stay here, then you need to serve at least 2-5 years in the army", because I don't trust them touching our ships or aircraft, or just use them as ammunition. Might be a good deterrent for people to stop coming here, probs not.
2-5 years is way too few. The Romans demanded like 20 years out of their foreign legionnaires before they could claim citizenship. Then when they did, they could all claim it honestly, because they had long ceased to be recognisable as anything but Roman.
Even then it would probably still be best to use ghetto clearance tactics by keeping them separated from their ethnic kin amongst either other types of foreigner or other natives so they're atomized and forced to fit into the dominant overarching culture. That way you don't risk the temptation of them falling back into old loyalties and forming ethnic enclaves, which are the antithesis of integration (and also exactly what we allowed them to do ofc).
 
Última edición:
People are slaves to the legislation. They often don't question it.
I've seen this both professionally and personally.
Think we were taking about this in another thread. They believe morality is downstream of law. I pointed out that leads to ‘only following orders’ but that didn’t go down well…
I think we should just enlist every small boat paki that comes onshore,
not a single one should step onto our soil. Mine the channel if we need to
 
2-5 years is way too few. The Romans demanded like 20 years out of their foreign legionnaires before they could claim citizenship.
I never said they should get citizenship, I was more saying it in a way to deter people, use them for the big meat grinder in the next war. Saves sending native British people.

Starmer would be the worst fucking NATO secretary general ever, he would be laughed at in every single fucking room he walks in to. What is he going to do in the event of a crisis? Hope all sides come together in the sake of international human law? I fucking hate these lawyer bastards.
 
Tory shadow defence voiced a rumour in parliament today, that Starmer has ambition for NATO secretary general. Not a rumour i'd heard before, but god damn, if he's actually thinking that way, it's the cheekiest idea I've heard for a long while.
Great idea. He should lead from the front. say somewhere in the crimea. Dress him in something visible.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo